Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Joe Rogan podcast, check it out! The
0:04
Joe Rogan Experience. Train
0:06
by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night,
0:08
all day! Alright,
0:12
hello. What's happening? Hey,
0:15
great to be back. Thanks for
0:17
having me. Your movie is really
0:19
funny. It's really funny. By myself,
0:21
laughing out loud, hysterically today. I
0:24
watched it in the sauna, I watched it in the
0:26
gym. I watched it, it
0:29
was, it's one of the best comedies
0:31
I've seen in a long time. There's so
0:33
many moments that are so uncomfortable. That
0:36
means a lot, appreciate that. That's what we're
0:39
hoping for. The
0:41
Robin DiAngelo one, where you gave that
0:43
guy money for reparations and you got
0:45
her, she thought it was uncomfortable. Yeah,
0:48
that was kind of a... When
0:52
we had the idea for the film to talk
0:54
about race, we knew we needed to get Robin
0:56
DiAngelo. I didn't think we'd get her, because I
0:58
figured she'd be a lot more... Savvy? Yes,
1:01
savvy and cautious. But
1:04
apparently she has no idea what's happening outside of
1:07
her bubble at all. So
1:09
she didn't know who I was. I gave her my name, and she
1:11
had no clue. Wow. But
1:15
we kind of went into that
1:17
knowing what the end was supposed to be, if we could
1:19
get her. We came up with that idea, we went to
1:22
a bar the night before the
1:24
interview, and we came up with this idea, could
1:26
we get her to actually pay reparations to
1:28
Ben, our black producer? And
1:32
we had to kind of talk him into it. And
1:35
it was really just like, in
1:38
real time I was there for about two hours, and
1:40
it was an hour and a half of the most
1:42
mind-numbing conversation, where I'm just... None
1:45
of that's in the movie, because it's just me, like, fluff
1:48
questions. And I'm repeating back to her
1:50
own ideas, so she knows that I'm a safe person. It's
1:53
a safe space, and then you've got to build to it, and build to
1:55
it, and build to it, and then finally you get to a point where
1:57
you can do something a little weird. that
2:00
she'll probably go along with it. And she did. I
2:04
mean, you saw we go through a whole, we have a
2:06
whole series of exercises we wanna do with her. And
2:08
she went, she did it. She was game. So
2:14
that was, and that was
2:16
one of the first things we filmed. So after we got that, we
2:18
knew that, okay, we have a movie here.
2:20
I feel like you got your money's worth with her, seeing as it's
2:22
$15,000, but I
2:24
feel like you got robbed by the lady that got
2:26
upset about the mascot. 50
2:30
grand, you barely got anything out of her. Yeah,
2:32
that was, well, part of the point of the
2:34
movie is that's why we put the price tags
2:36
on the screen. We
2:38
want people to see how absurd it is. So in
2:40
a certain way, it was like, the
2:45
higher they quoted the price, we said, great, we'll
2:47
pay that. Because we want this
2:49
in the movie. Right. Because
2:51
if all these people had said, oh yeah, I'll do it for
2:53
free, or I'll do it for 200 bucks, just pay my travel,
2:55
doesn't really make the point. But
2:58
they all were quoting exorbitant prices,
3:00
and she was the most. And
3:04
then she basically said almost nothing, but it
3:06
was okay. No
3:09
one ever found out who the identity of the mascot
3:11
is? No, I don't think so. It would
3:14
have been hilarious if it was a person of color. Well,
3:16
it almost certainly was. It almost certainly was, because
3:18
if it was a white guy, they would have
3:20
thrown him under the bus. Yeah, they
3:22
would have. So the fact that they didn't, yeah,
3:25
it's probably something like Hispanic kid or something. And
3:28
you gotta imagine, you can't see real good
3:30
with that fucking costume. You ever put a
3:32
mascot costume on? I haven't,
3:34
but I can tell that there's little eye
3:37
slits. You can't even see what's below you.
3:39
Exactly. Duncan
3:41
and I did a whole podcast where we pretended to
3:43
be furries. We lasted, every
3:46
podcast we do, we dress up. We'll dress up
3:48
like Star Wars people or whatever, spaceship
3:50
people. We did a podcast as furries.
3:53
We kept the helmets on for maybe five minutes. We're like,
3:55
I can't fucking do it. And we both took them off.
3:57
We're like props to the furries. If you could run around
3:59
with this thing on, This is hard to do. Like
4:01
you can't see shit. You can't breathe. So
4:03
the idea that he missed those kids is
4:06
like. The furries are doing a lot more than running
4:08
around in those things too. So that's the. They are.
4:10
They are. I think they designed special ones for that.
4:12
Yeah. I don't even wanna know. But. Like
4:15
a hatch. But that's, it's actually a perfect example of
4:17
what these people do, these race
4:19
hustlers, that something happened, it
4:22
was a little bit unpleasant. Yes.
4:24
Not a big deal. There's a million ways to interpret that.
4:27
It's just a normal human thing that happens in the world.
4:29
Things happen that are a little bit unpleasant. You're disappointed. Your
4:31
kid didn't get a high five. Okay, it happens. But
4:34
for them, they have one
4:36
lens for seeing the world. And the lens
4:38
is through this left wing racial ideology. So
4:40
everything that happens is colored by that. Right.
4:43
And everything is understood through that lens. So
4:46
anything, I mean, you think
4:48
about Michelle
4:51
Obama when she was first
4:53
lady. She had multiple stories that she would
4:55
tell about as first
4:57
lady being discriminated against because
4:59
of her race, allegedly. And one of them
5:01
was, she was
5:03
in line for ice cream or something and someone cut in front
5:05
of her. And she told
5:08
this story in some interview, this very dramatic
5:10
story about, well, they didn't see her cause
5:12
she's black. And meanwhile,
5:14
it's like, we've all been cut lady. People have
5:16
cut in front of all of us. It's just
5:18
that if it happens to me at Walmart, I
5:20
don't think of it racially. I just think, oh,
5:23
this person's an asshole. Exactly. But for her, it's
5:25
all racial. So that's kind of. But that's a
5:27
crazy one to say that someone cutting in front
5:29
of you, a selfish act is somehow racist. Just
5:31
because, that's like looking for racism everywhere.
5:35
That kind of situation is so normal. That's
5:38
so normal that some dick cuts in front of you. Right,
5:40
exactly. It's an unpleasant thing that
5:42
happens to all people. And
5:45
if you're not in the kind of
5:47
race hustle or bubble, you don't see it
5:50
that way. But that's. But it's interesting that nobody
5:52
wants to call that out. Nobody wants to be reasonable. Nobody
5:55
wants to say, well, is that like, you just say,
5:57
oh, wow, you have to listen to it. That's part
5:59
of the problem. Like you can't say, are
6:01
you sure that's racist? Cause then you're a
6:03
racist apologist and then you're racist
6:05
by proxy. Yeah. And how do you know, so how
6:07
do you know what's in that other person's mind? How
6:10
can you ascribe motives to them? This,
6:12
it drives me nuts that this is what, this is
6:15
what we do now, where if someone does something or
6:17
says something, someone else is offended by
6:19
it, that person who's offended
6:21
gets to decide what
6:24
the intent was behind the other person's
6:26
action, to the extent that if
6:28
the other person says, this was my
6:30
intention, I'll tell you what it was. They don't
6:32
get to have a say in the intentions behind their own actions.
6:35
They are suddenly not authorities in
6:37
their own behavior. Exactly. This
6:39
other person who was the offended party gets
6:42
to inform you what you meant by that thing,
6:46
which is really what the, I
6:48
mean, the move is called Am I racist? But in
6:51
reality, there's
6:54
only one person who can answer whether you're a racist person
6:56
and that's you. And if
6:59
you don't think that you're racist, then
7:02
you aren't because racism is a thought process. And
7:04
if it's not in your head, then you're not
7:06
racist. You might
7:09
have stereotypical views about people of other
7:11
races, everybody does to some extent. You
7:14
might think things that are even insulting about
7:16
people of other races, but it's not racist
7:18
because racist means you hate people
7:20
of other races or you think they're inferior to you. But
7:24
you could be not a racist person
7:26
and think that whatever, Asians
7:28
are bad drivers. You could think that that
7:31
stereotype is true. Whether it's true or
7:33
not, you just happen to think that that's a true thing about
7:35
this group. Doesn't mean you hate them, doesn't mean that you think
7:37
that they're inferior. You
7:40
can say frat boys are annoying and not hate
7:42
men. Exactly. Yeah. Exactly.
7:45
And most of the time, these stereotypes, they
7:47
didn't just fall out of the sky, like
7:49
they're grounded in something. If they did, no
7:51
one would, it wouldn't make any sense. Right.
7:55
And nobody would be offended. That's the thing, nobody would
7:57
be offended by a stereotype. Right. That
7:59
really was not true at all. at all.
8:01
You're only offended because it rings true at
8:03
least a little bit because otherwise
8:05
it would just be absurd.
8:08
Which is why when you get, I mean in the movie we
8:10
go, there's a section where
8:12
we go kind of outside this bubble and
8:14
we go down, we talk to bikers at
8:16
a biker bar in the
8:18
south, we talk to the poor black
8:21
community in New Orleans. And
8:24
the only reason we did that was
8:26
just, let's find people who are not,
8:29
they probably didn't go to college so they
8:31
didn't get brainwashed there. They're not getting the
8:33
corporate DEI seminars. They're not reading
8:36
Robin DiAngelo or any of these people. What
8:39
do they think about this stuff? Are they worried
8:41
about systemic racism? Do they see everything as racist
8:43
all the time? And what we found is no,
8:45
they're just not even, they don't even
8:47
speak that language. When you say the
8:49
term systemic racism to them, they say,
8:51
well what do you mean by that? What is that? This
8:53
was something that, look, people are always concerned
8:55
about people being racist, but there's something that
8:57
happened in this country somewhere around 2012ish where
8:59
things really,
9:03
really ramped up. And it
9:05
just became
9:08
much more of a subject, a
9:10
subject that was like constantly around
9:13
worrying about racial bias and it
9:17
ramped up, right? It ramped up till you get
9:19
to the point where you do have some of
9:21
these race hustlers that are saying
9:24
everyone's racist. You must confront
9:26
your unconscious bias and you're
9:28
just constantly hearing about it.
9:32
I think you're right that it was around 2012. BLM
9:35
came into formation in 2013, I think that was
9:38
the Trayvon Martin thing. So
9:42
it's not a coincidence that it seemed like race
9:44
relations in this country were improving decade after decade.
9:47
They weren't perfect, but it seemed like they were
9:49
pretty good. Much better than the sixties. Yeah, the
9:51
nineties. I grew up in the nineties. It was
9:53
not perfect, but I
9:55
grew up in a diverse area. I went to public
9:57
school, a lot of people with different ethnicities and races.
10:00
We weren't talking about racism all the time. It was
10:02
basically fine. And
10:05
then something happened in the
10:08
middle part of the first decade of
10:10
the 2000s where it seemed like
10:12
things started backsliding. And that's right at
10:14
a time when Barack Obama was elected.
10:17
And that's not a coincidence. Like a lot of
10:19
people have noticed that, it's odd that we had
10:21
a black president and then all of a sudden,
10:24
now we're having race riots again. And
10:26
I think the reason is that when
10:29
you elect a black president, I didn't like Obama,
10:32
I didn't vote for him. I think his policies are terrible.
10:35
But you would think that at least one positive
10:37
you could draw from that is that, well, at
10:39
least that means that systemic racism is
10:42
not a problem in this country anymore. I mean, if
10:44
a black guy could rise to the
10:46
top of the system and run it, then
10:49
clearly the system is not racist against black
10:51
people. And in fact, was
10:53
overwhelmingly voted into that position by Americans. Which
10:57
is true, so that is evidence that America
10:59
isn't systemically racist against black people, but the
11:01
race hustlers don't want us
11:03
to draw that conclusion. They're worried that we'll look
11:05
at Obama as president and say, okay, well, racism
11:07
isn't a big issue anymore. And
11:10
that's a problem for them because there's a lot
11:12
of power, money and influence to be found in
11:14
the racist, racism narrative. So they had to kind
11:16
of like double up on their efforts
11:18
to convince us that America is actually racist,
11:21
which is why during Obama's term,
11:23
that's when we started getting all these race hoaxes
11:25
and the race riots and BLM. That's
11:28
when things like people started talking about microaggressions and all
11:30
this kind of nonsense, because they needed
11:32
to tell us that, yeah, you might think
11:35
that this issue is kind of solved now, but it's
11:37
not. Racism is actually worse than
11:39
you ever imagined. It's lurking everywhere. And
11:41
now we're at a point, yeah,
11:44
and then not long after that, they started
11:46
tearing down Confederate civil war monuments
11:48
and stuff, stuff that's
11:50
been there for like 100 years, which was
11:52
always weird because 100 years ago, people
11:55
could whatever, walk by a Robert E. Lee
11:57
monument and not care. a big deal to
12:00
them, black or white. Now
12:02
all of a sudden, it's
12:04
a bigger deal to us than it was to people
12:07
whose parents fought. They had grandparents who
12:09
fought in the Civil War or died
12:11
in the Civil War. They
12:14
were okay with it. And yet
12:16
for us, what, the wounds of the Civil War
12:18
are fresher or more raw for us than they
12:20
were for people a century ago? It makes no
12:22
sense. How are we less able to be
12:25
objective and non-emotional about the Civil War
12:27
than people who had family
12:29
members? I mean, slaves, ex-slaves were still
12:32
living back then. Well,
12:34
I think it's because it's just like a
12:36
religious ideology. Like when the Taliban started blowing
12:38
up those ancient statues of Buddhas. Do you
12:40
remember that? Yeah. Because like
12:43
they could, like they destroyed
12:45
things that were a part of human
12:47
history that we would have studied for
12:49
thousands of years. And they destroyed them
12:51
because they didn't go along with their
12:53
religious ideology. And I think part of
12:56
the woke thing is this
12:58
religious ideology that has
13:01
to be followed. And you cannot stray
13:03
from the lines. You have to stay
13:05
inside whatever this ideology is promoting and
13:07
telling you what to do. And
13:10
one of the things was that you had
13:12
to take down all these statues of terrible
13:14
people. And I remember Trump saying at the
13:17
time, well, the problem with that is like,
13:19
eventually they're going to take down George Washington
13:21
and everybody thought he was crazy. Like that's
13:23
a crazy thing to say. But once they
13:26
got past Civil War people, then they got
13:28
to who owned slaves and then
13:30
they got to taking down, they wanted to take
13:32
down statues of Thomas Jefferson and eventually did
13:34
get to George Washington. Yeah. And that was
13:36
always, it was always going to go that
13:38
way because George
13:40
Washington, the founding fathers owned slaves. Not
13:44
only that, but they were rebels
13:47
rebelling against a governmental
13:50
authority. And if they had
13:52
lost them, they all would have been hanged
13:54
as traitors and that's how they'd be remembered.
13:57
Thankfully they didn't. But so there's a,
13:59
it's actually, there's It's not that far
14:01
of a leap to go from one to the other. And
14:04
of course the issue is that everybody
14:07
who lived on earth prior
14:09
to about, certainly
14:12
prior to 100 years ago, is
14:15
racist by our standards today, every single one.
14:18
There was no one who lived on earth 100 years ago who
14:20
we would not consider racist anywhere
14:22
of any race. If you
14:24
go back 200 years or
14:26
earlier than that, almost
14:29
everybody either owned slaves
14:31
or was OK with slavery as an institution. You
14:34
go back 500 years and
14:37
there was nobody on the planet who
14:40
considered slavery to be wrong fundamentally.
14:42
They might have had issues with how slaves
14:44
are treated in some context, but it
14:47
took like thousands of years for it to ever
14:49
even occur to a single human on earth that
14:51
slavery is actually fundamentally wrong, which
14:55
is a crazy thing. And that's actually an interesting
14:57
thing you could talk about and think about. Like,
14:59
why is that? How could it be that it's
15:01
so obvious to us but some of
15:03
the greatest minds of history, they never thought of it. But
15:06
we can't talk about that because we have to talk
15:08
about slavery and racism as if they're exclusively white Western
15:11
phenomena. Well, I've
15:14
had friends that have a different perspective on
15:16
the Obama situation. And my friend
15:18
Willie was talking to me about this. And he was
15:20
saying that what happened was when you look, one
15:25
thing that we can be sure of is that
15:27
race is surreal. There are real racists in this
15:29
country. There's real anti-Black racists, anti-Asian
15:31
racists. There's certain people that have hateful
15:34
ideology in this country, just in certain
15:36
percentage of them in the world. So
15:39
those are real. And when Obama
15:41
became president, those people became more
15:43
emboldened. And he said that he
15:45
saw a lot more of that
15:47
online and a lot more attacks,
15:50
and especially in uncensored
15:52
online forums like 4chan and
15:54
places where you can kind of get
15:56
away with saying whatever the fuck you want. He said he
15:58
saw a lot more of that. on the streets
16:01
and he said this is probably why he
16:03
believed Michelle Obama didn't want to run for president
16:05
because she experienced so much of that hate
16:07
while they're in the White House. Forget about hate
16:09
for their their policies and
16:12
what you think about them as
16:14
president and vice and first lady
16:16
but the racism hate. So
16:18
his perspective as a black guy was like
16:20
you had to be a black person to realize
16:22
how angry people were that there was a black
16:25
guy who was president because that was real too.
16:28
It was real that racism in American
16:30
racial relations in America had changed radically
16:32
since the 1960s certainly since the 1920s
16:34
and 30s and
16:37
and over the years has kept getting
16:39
better but in his mind there
16:42
was something that happened where when Barack
16:44
Obama got into the White House that
16:47
the real hardcore racist got very vocal
16:49
and he experienced it and
16:51
I think this is akin
16:54
in some ways to what's going
16:56
on with anti-semitism online because
16:59
I think there's always been a certain amount
17:01
of people in this country and in the
17:04
world that are like deeply anti-semitic and
17:07
they just don't like Jews and
17:09
when something happens where all the
17:12
sudden now it's okay to criticize
17:14
Jews because of Israel's position in
17:16
Gaza and what they've done now
17:18
you see anti-semitism just pop out
17:20
of the woodwork. I think
17:22
there's something like that where people feel
17:25
emboldened to talk about things so like
17:27
maybe we just don't have an accurate account of
17:29
how fucked up some people are but
17:32
the general population and whether you're
17:34
conservative or whether you're liberal
17:38
everybody kind of agrees that racism
17:40
is a stupid thing there's amazing
17:42
people of all ethnicities and colors
17:45
and you should judge people like
17:47
Martin Luther King said by the content of their
17:49
character we all agree that but there's
17:53
a certain amount of people that are
17:55
always going to be racist but when
17:57
you start looking for it everywhere and
18:00
And saying everything is racist, first of
18:02
all, you are, it's an
18:04
insult to real racism. It's
18:06
an insult to the people that are the
18:08
victims of real racism. When you consider microaggressions
18:10
or cutting in line in front of you
18:12
to get ice cream, there's
18:15
people that are real victims of racism. And
18:18
pretending that everything is racist just
18:20
minimizes that and in fact probably
18:22
makes more people racist. It's going
18:24
to make a bunch of dumb
18:26
liberals drop to their
18:28
knees or give you money for reparations but
18:30
it's going to make a bunch of other
18:32
people really resentful and it just polarizes us
18:34
and drives people further and further apart. It's
18:38
just genuinely stupid. It's
18:40
a self-fulfilling prophecy and I think
18:43
that's true what
18:46
he said about, I'm
18:49
sure that when there's a black president that we
18:51
know there are real racists out there, they're anti-black,
18:53
they're anti-white racists but they're
18:55
out there and social
18:58
media was also really coming online around that
19:00
time so people had a forum to express
19:02
this kind of stuff. And
19:05
anonymously. Anonymous. And so yeah, those
19:07
people come out of the woodwork. I'm sure that did happen, I
19:09
don't deny that. The difference though
19:11
is that that
19:13
kind of racism is personal
19:16
and individual. It's
19:18
not systemic. It's not in the
19:20
system. And also
19:24
it's absolutely rejected by
19:27
society. It's absolutely rejected by polite society. So
19:29
there's a reason why they had to go to 4chan
19:31
or whatever to express those views because you can't come
19:34
out in public and say it and if you do
19:36
it, it'll be like the end of whatever your career
19:38
is, it's probably the end of it. And
19:40
that's kind of, that's
19:43
the most, when it comes to, as you said, there's never
19:45
going to be a time when there's no racists in the
19:47
world. So the
19:49
most you can do is, okay, we're not going to have
19:52
this stuff systemically. The system's going to treat
19:54
everybody equally. Great. So we've
19:56
got to go to the list. We've already done that. Actually,
19:58
we've gone too far because we have affirmative action where... Now
20:00
you're discriminating against white and Asian people, but so
20:03
anti-black racism is out of the system. Fantastic,
20:05
that's good. It's
20:08
not accepted by mainstream society. Great.
20:11
And then, so that's kind
20:14
of it. I mean, what else can we
20:16
do with this? You can't get inside people's
20:18
hearts and make them not feel things. Those
20:20
people are gonna be out there. They
20:22
know that it's not accepted in mainstream
20:24
society. And I kind
20:26
of think you could sort of
20:28
move on from it culturally to
20:30
other issues. It's not a major
20:33
issue anymore, but
20:36
they won't allow it. And you're right that
20:38
then it's got this pendulum thing where, okay,
20:41
well, if you go after white people and
20:43
you demonize them relentlessly,
20:46
then you do it practically from birth now through the
20:48
school system, some
20:51
of those white people are gonna end up being
20:53
stricken by guilt, and they're gonna walk around
20:55
feeling like they're guilty for something. That's the
20:57
white guilt liberal thing. But
20:59
then you're gonna have others who kind
21:02
of become exactly what you accuse them of being because they're
21:04
like, oh, you know what? If you're gonna
21:07
call me racist anyway, then you know what? Fine.
21:10
And there's gonna resentment that builds up and then you actually
21:13
create more of it, which I think they're happy about. If
21:16
actual racism is increasing in society, I don't know if
21:18
it is or not, but I think
21:20
the people that call themselves anti-racist are quite
21:22
happy about that. Well, business is booming. But
21:24
the other thing is like, think about Robert
21:27
D'Angelo, who you said just lives in her
21:29
own bubble and really didn't know who you
21:31
were and didn't catch on at any point
21:33
in time that any of this
21:35
stuff was ridiculous. Like, these
21:38
people, if that's all
21:40
you think about and that's all you, like, I
21:42
have friends that live in California and
21:44
every now and then I'll talk to them and
21:47
some politics issue will come up. And
21:49
they give me this fucking CNBC, they
21:53
give me this MSNBC, this fucking
21:55
propaganda viewpoint on something that's so
21:57
wrong, just so... and I just
22:00
go, okay, I can't, like
22:02
you're in. You're
22:04
in your bubble, there's no real
22:06
discourse. There's
22:08
no real, there's no discussions
22:11
about whether or not what these people are saying
22:14
is correct. It's just, you're a part of this
22:16
tribe and this is what you believe. And
22:19
I think that's the case with these anti-racist people
22:21
too. Some of them
22:23
might be like just hardcore grifters. Like
22:25
they could be playing three card money
22:28
or they could just get corporations to give them
22:30
money by saying that everybody's
22:32
racist. There's some people that are definitely like
22:34
that. But there's other people that are just,
22:37
that's their friend group. Like that's
22:39
their social circle. Their social circles, all people
22:41
believe this stupid shit and they all yap
22:43
it to each other and they say it
22:45
like it's a mantra and they pray five
22:48
times a day with it. You
22:50
know, it's really like a religious thing. I think it is
22:52
like a, yeah, I think you're exactly right about that. That's
22:54
why for me, the more, so
22:56
the grifters that are getting paid, why
23:00
they're doing it. Like they're getting paid. A lot
23:02
of them. A lot of them
23:04
are. And even when they're not, there's still power
23:06
and influence and they're being consulted
23:09
as kind of these moral gurus, which
23:11
is very, strokes the ego.
23:14
That's rewarding for the, the more interesting thing
23:16
is what about the people who
23:19
go to those people and
23:21
consult them as moral gurus? I mean, in the movie
23:23
we have this race to dinner where you got these
23:25
white women who sit around
23:27
a table and they invite these other two women,
23:30
Cybert Rau and Regina Jackson, to
23:32
come to dinner. They pay them to come to dinner
23:34
and call them racist for two hours. And
23:37
it's like, why would you subject yourself
23:39
to that? It's so, it seems
23:42
like the most miserable experience to
23:44
volunteer to be broken down and insulted and degraded,
23:46
which is what happened to these women. I mean,
23:48
I saw it. They were, it's like two hours
23:50
of them just getting, you're
23:53
racist, you're racist, you're racist. They
23:55
had to go around the table, confess their racist
23:57
sins. And
23:59
then they all, each go and they say what their
24:01
racist sin, like what's a racist thing you've done recently,
24:04
they all confess and I'm
24:06
listening to it it's like none of you have actually done
24:08
anything racist. I listen to all your stories, none
24:10
of that is racist. There's a woman
24:12
who said that she's married to a black guy and
24:16
she yeah he's
24:18
loud and she tells him to quiet down sometimes. What
24:22
wife has not said that to their husband. I
24:26
get that once a month. Right so what do they think? I
24:30
think my wife is racist. She could be. She
24:33
could be. She's sexist against me. Yeah.
24:35
She's sexist against me. So what are
24:37
they getting out of it? Well they're getting
24:39
out of it first of all they're terrified of
24:41
being called racist so they jump the gun so
24:44
they headed off at the path like I'm gonna
24:46
make sure I'm not racist so I'm gonna become
24:48
an anti-racist. You know I talked
24:50
about this before but when my kids were young
24:52
like my youngest
24:54
was pretty young when they
24:57
started doing this anti-racism thing at
24:59
the school where they said it's
25:02
not enough to be not
25:05
racist. This is actually right after we left
25:07
so it's right after like the George Floyd
25:09
things popped off. They said it's not good
25:12
enough to not be racist you have
25:14
to be anti-racist. You're talking about some
25:16
of these kids in
25:18
that school are six. Like
25:21
what are you saying? It's not enough. What
25:23
are you saying? You saying a six year
25:25
old has to be an anti-racist can't they
25:27
just play with their toys? Can't
25:30
they just go to the park and hang
25:32
out with their friends? Can't they just play
25:34
sports? Can't they just enjoy each other? Six
25:36
year olds don't give a fuck what color
25:38
somebody is. They don't. They all
25:41
just play together. They just want to play
25:43
with the people who are nice to them
25:45
and who they have fun with and laugh
25:48
with. And here you've got some fucking grifter
25:50
who latches themselves onto some school system that's
25:52
filled with all these terrified
25:54
liberals that are just terrified of being
25:57
called out for anything and they're all
25:59
the rules are changing and everybody's
26:01
like, oh! And so they
26:03
bend the knee. They bend
26:05
the knee. And with kids, it's so
26:07
insidious because, yeah, kids don't
26:10
care about race. They
26:12
notice it though, which is fine.
26:15
But then you give them like this complex
26:17
from such a young age, which is
26:20
so unnecessary. And that's why, I mean, I remember
26:22
when my oldest daughter was five, we were at the
26:24
mall or something and a black
26:27
family walked by. And she pointed
26:31
at them and said, why
26:33
are people black? Why
26:36
is their skin like that? She wanted to
26:38
know, why does skin color exist? How
26:42
do some people have different skin color than other people? And
26:45
of course, I told her,
26:47
to be polite, we don't point at people in public.
26:49
So I told her that. But then we
26:51
talked about it. It's OK to wonder
26:54
that. It's OK to notice that. I
26:56
think with these anti-racist people, if
26:58
I was listening to them, I should have, this
27:01
would have been an opportunity for me to give her
27:03
a whole lecture about racism and make her feel really
27:05
bad for noticing that and asking about it. And
27:09
then you create this complex. And
27:12
yeah, fast forward 20 years, and she's one
27:14
of these women at a race
27:16
to dinner. Exactly. It's
27:18
awful. But it's a
27:21
very potent thing. I
27:23
mean, white guilt, the fear
27:25
of being called racist. It's hard for me to understand
27:27
because I get
27:29
called racist all the time, 50,000 times a day.
27:33
And it just rolls off my back. I don't care because
27:35
it's just it's unknown. It doesn't mean anything. It doesn't
27:37
mean anything. But for
27:39
you and I, it doesn't mean anything. But for
27:41
a lot of normal people, especially. It's a
27:43
death sentence. Right, to be called that. It's
27:46
the worst thing in the world. They're
27:48
terrified of it. They'd
27:50
rather they literally rather be called anything than
27:53
racist. Yeah. And then so
27:55
for them, once you those kinds of
27:57
people, the
28:00
threat, when being called racist
28:02
is a threat, you can get them to do anything.
28:05
And we've, I mean, spoilers
28:07
or whatever, but in the movie,
28:10
the last thing in the movie when I do
28:12
my own anti-racist workshop with these people, and they're
28:14
all real people, and
28:17
we get them to join in on some
28:19
things that are really like morally
28:21
repugnant because
28:24
they're terrified of being called racist publicly. They
28:27
can't stand that thought. And
28:29
the other thing that happens with kids is if
28:32
you have a thing like you're telling the
28:35
kid they have to be anti-racist, well, some
28:37
kids are going to use that as a
28:40
platform to increase, you
28:42
know, whatever social cred that they have, and
28:44
they get feedback from it. It's
28:47
positive feedback, and they get very vocal, and the more
28:49
vocal, the more people are impressed, and the more work
28:51
they do, the more people are going, you're doing great
28:54
work. And then you get what's essentially like
28:56
the racial version of Greta Thurnberg. Like
28:59
what is that lady? That lady's moral
29:01
outrage at what have you done? How
29:03
dare you? And everybody's like, yes, we
29:06
like what you just did. And so now you
29:08
do it all the time. And so now somehow
29:10
or another, a 16-year-old kid travels all over the
29:12
world telling everybody they're bad, flying
29:15
around in jets, telling everybody they're bad
29:17
for ruining the environment. And she gets
29:19
to feel... Morally
29:21
superior, morally superior, virtuous. And for
29:23
a child to be in a
29:25
position where they become virtuous is,
29:28
you know, they love that. They
29:30
love that. To be in a position where they can
29:32
lecture adults. Yes. Or adults are looking
29:35
to them as authorities. Yes. College
29:37
kids love to do that. The moment they're out of
29:39
their house, the moment they don't have their parents telling
29:41
them what to do anymore, now they can tell other
29:43
people what to do. And it's just like, it's
29:45
one thing that you see online from
29:48
people who have been bullied in the past. People
29:52
that have been picked on and fucked with,
29:54
boy, they like to do it to people,
29:57
like online, on Twitter mobs. They like to
29:59
jump in. And I know a lot of people
30:01
that have, I've known a lot of people that have
30:03
engaged in these things. I've known them personally.
30:06
These feeble, weak, terrified
30:08
men, and they say
30:10
the most heinous things
30:12
about people, like uncharitable,
30:14
not knowing like what kind of
30:16
response these words are going to
30:18
have in that person. And
30:21
they bully these people because they've been hurt. You
30:23
know, it's that hurt people, hurt people thing. That's
30:26
what it is. They don't think it's
30:28
as bad as bullying, like in real life,
30:30
bullying is terrible. You're going to hit somebody? How dare
30:32
you, you fucking monster? Well, you're emotionally
30:34
scarring people online every day and you
30:36
think you're doing it through this. It's
30:40
like one of the things, Elon's
30:42
talked about this, that one of
30:44
the things that Woke does, it
30:46
allows really mean people. This ideology
30:48
allows really mean, shitty people to
30:50
have a virtuous way of expressing
30:52
that. Yeah, I
30:54
think that's right. And also the internet,
30:58
I mean the whole idea that the internet isn't real, you
31:00
hear it all the time. That's why I hate
31:02
when people say, well, Twitter isn't real life. And
31:05
I understand what's meant by that when people say that, but
31:07
it actually is real life because these
31:10
are human beings who are communicating with each
31:12
other. Now, there are bots too, but if
31:15
you're a human being on Twitter saying something,
31:18
that's real life. It's not fake. This isn't
31:20
happening in some kind of dream world.
31:24
But then people think that, well, okay, if I just say
31:26
this on Twitter, I put it in a YouTube comment section
31:29
and it's this heinous, awful thing. It
31:31
doesn't count. It doesn't mean I'm a bad person because it's not real
31:33
life. Which is like, that's like
31:37
writing on a loose leaf paper, calling someone a
31:39
piece of shit and handing it to them. And
31:42
then they get mad at you and you say, hey man,
31:44
it's the paper, it's not real life. It
31:46
just happened on the paper. It's
31:49
a method for communicating. And
31:51
so I think people have been conditioned
31:54
that in this world, it's like a moral exception.
31:56
So you can do and say whatever you want
31:59
and you don't have to feel bad. about it. And then it
32:01
turns people into sociopaths after a while I think.
32:03
I think it does too. And I also think
32:05
it ramps up anxiety in a huge way for
32:07
the people that are actually engaging in it. You
32:10
know, the people that actually do it, I
32:12
think they're just fully anxious all day long.
32:14
And I think it's terrible for mental health.
32:17
Even if you're like quote unquote winning these
32:19
verbal battles online that you're engaging in, I
32:21
think it's terrible for everybody. It's
32:23
really terrible for the people that are
32:25
just like all day long negative. Like
32:27
there's an arguing with people. Like why
32:29
do you want that in your life?
32:31
That's a very unusual position to be
32:33
in where all day long you're in
32:35
conflict. That's only war. In
32:37
the real world, most of the day,
32:39
there's no conflict. That's why conflict is
32:42
so uncomfortable because it's so unusual. If
32:44
you're used to conflict with people all the time and you see
32:46
some guy and he's like, fuck you. No, fuck you. But
32:49
if you're not used to someone saying, fuck you. And then all of a
32:51
sudden, hey, fuck you. And you're like, what? Like you're
32:53
terrified. You're freaked out. Like what's going on? Oh my
32:56
God, this is conflict. The kind
32:58
of conflict, verbal conflict that people engage
33:00
in online all day long has the
33:02
same sort of effects on your psyche.
33:04
You are perceiving the world to be
33:06
this. This is one of the things
33:08
that's so polarizing about this particular election,
33:10
right? That people are willing to
33:12
accept propaganda because it feeds into
33:15
their view of the world, which
33:17
is that they're engaged in this
33:19
moral battle, good
33:21
versus evil. And both sides think they're good and
33:23
both sides think the other side is going to
33:25
be the end of the world. And
33:28
it's accentuated heavily by mentally
33:31
ill people that are on
33:33
Twitter all day long. Yeah,
33:36
I'm one of them. So
33:38
he's fine. But
33:40
I mean, I am guilty of some of this. I
33:43
do. I'm on it way too much, first of all, but
33:46
I, but then I have my excuse, which is as
33:48
part of my job, your job. I
33:51
do often think if I didn't do this for a living at all, I
33:54
don't think I'd be on any of this stuff. I think
33:56
I'd be off everything. Yeah. If I was
33:58
not a quote unquote public. I would be
34:01
off everything. Because I don't know if you have
34:03
a problem. If I go on vacation or something and I'm
34:05
taking time, I have no issue putting it down. I
34:07
have no compulsion to look at it. In fact, I
34:09
have to, when I come off vacation, it's effort to
34:11
get back, it's like, okay,
34:14
I got to get back into this again. It
34:16
takes me a couple days, and then after a couple days, now it's a compulsion
34:18
again. But I have to
34:20
reignite this weird compulsion to constantly look at
34:23
my phone. I have a
34:25
problem, too, in that I'm a comedian and
34:27
that I'm also a gold miner, right? So
34:29
what that means is when I'm going through my
34:31
newsfeed, my newsfeed is the thing I'm the most
34:34
addicted to. I'm mining for gold. Like, what's going
34:36
on here? What'd they do? They did what? They
34:39
fucking what? And I need those.
34:41
Those are really important to me. Because
34:43
those can be my next hour of
34:45
standup. Those can be, they're chunks. And
34:48
it's not every day. It's like, I can go
34:50
through 30 days of nonsense and just not one
34:52
thing. But every now and then, there's a chunk
34:55
of gold in there. I'm like, oh, I got
34:57
one. And then I put that in my notes
34:59
and I justify endless
35:02
scrolling to get to those gold
35:04
nuggets. But if you didn't do any of this
35:06
for a living, if you just worked at Lowe's or something and you
35:08
know, do you think you'd still be? The
35:10
problem is I'd still be me. And I still have this
35:14
really intense curiosity. I'm
35:17
really curious about all kinds of things. There's so
35:19
many subjects I'm really, really interested in. I
35:22
mean, I would for sure still be paying
35:24
attention to science
35:26
issues and space travel and
35:29
new discoveries in the universe. And there's a
35:31
bunch of stuff that I would just be,
35:34
ancient history, ancient civilizations. I would be, there's
35:36
no way I would not be fascinated by them because they
35:38
almost have nothing to do with my job. Yeah,
35:40
I think I would be the same, but I don't
35:42
think I'd feel the need to, I
35:45
would like to absorb all that interesting information, but I
35:47
wouldn't feel the need to say, hey world, here's what
35:49
I think about this. Right. I would just absorb it.
35:51
The problem is if you do and you do it
35:53
just once and then you get feedback and then people
35:55
say, hey, I really like what you posted. And like,
35:57
oh great. And then all of a sudden you're
35:59
connected. And then you're like looking for this
36:01
feedback so you're trying to post things to get
36:03
likes and you're trying to post things to get
36:05
reposts and get comments and You're engaging in the
36:07
comments and now now it's now you're fucked now.
36:10
You're locked into this weird Ecosystem
36:12
with these people you don't even know they might
36:14
be all stupid They might be all
36:16
you know really annoying people that you would avoid in real life
36:18
like if you work with them You're like go. There's Tom and
36:21
get the fuck out of it, and you go to the other
36:23
side of the office But now
36:25
you're engaging with them people that you
36:27
avoid having conversations with you are now
36:30
Like in mortal combat
36:32
with words on Twitter It's
36:35
fucking stupid and not only that but their
36:37
engagement with you is is cheap. It's uh
36:40
They don't care that much So even
36:42
if someone gives you positive feedback, and they say oh that was
36:44
a great tweet They've forgotten about it
36:47
two seconds later Right you're just they're just scrolling you're
36:49
just the latest thing they saw and then they're scrolling
36:51
and they've already forgotten about it They don't care if
36:54
they cuss you out because they're mad at you same
36:56
deal. They forgot about it two seconds later, so Yeah,
36:59
I guess it could be kind of intoxicating you get
37:01
the engagement, but then it
37:04
doesn't matter and that's one of the That's
37:06
one of the things that makes it so so toxic
37:08
is how sort of like nihilistic all is that's why?
37:12
This was this never was an issue before but now I feel like when
37:14
I go on social media I'm
37:17
constantly seeing these Horrific
37:20
videos of people dying like
37:23
snuff films are
37:25
all over social media now
37:27
and it feels like a relatively recent
37:30
development and That's
37:33
really horrible what it does. I don't even think
37:35
we quite understand what it's doing to our minds
37:37
I actually think we are are all traumatized from
37:39
it I don't use the word trauma loosely, but
37:42
what's what's traumatizing is not only are you seeing somebody die?
37:45
But it's a context. It's like You
37:49
see this horrible video someone just got shot, and
37:51
then you keep scrolling and
37:54
a second later you're Reading
37:56
something about whatever you know a celebrity
37:58
news or you're one watching a cat
38:00
video. Right. So it's like
38:02
this, it's this horrific human thing that happened, but
38:05
for you it's just content, you absorb it that
38:07
way. And
38:09
I don't know, after a while of
38:11
just absorbing human suffering in this way,
38:13
it's gotta mess with your mind.
38:16
Of course it does. I mean,
38:18
you're the product of what you take in, even
38:20
if that information is like low
38:22
impact, it's not the same impact as being there
38:24
when the hit men show up and gun the
38:26
guys down in front of the cafe. I've
38:29
seen these videos where it's just mass
38:31
shootings. This one video I saw
38:33
the other day of some gang violence situation,
38:35
these guys drove by, gunned these guys down,
38:37
and then the guys started shooting back and
38:39
they were all shot while they're shooting back,
38:41
and then the car backs up and then
38:43
they gunned them down more. Yeah, same. It's
38:45
fucking crazy. Same that way. But it's not
38:47
the same as being there. If you were there, that would haunt
38:50
you for the rest of your life. If you were across the
38:52
street and you watched that happen, you watched these people die, it
38:54
would haunt you for the rest of your life. But
38:56
it just, you get a little blip. Instead of getting 100% dose,
38:58
you get a little 1% dose, a
39:01
little 1% dose, and you get them all day long. And by
39:03
the end of the day, you're just like, what the fuck is
39:05
the world? Yeah. But
39:08
it's the thing, it kind of should haunt you for the rest
39:10
of your life. Right. It's a horrible
39:12
thing to see. But it's like Twitter in
39:14
that it's not a full experience. Like
39:17
the full experience, if you were having the kind
39:19
of exchanges that some people have with each other
39:21
where they're just ruthlessly insulting and shitty to people,
39:24
if you were having those in person, there's a
39:26
high probability that that's gonna lead to violence. Actual
39:29
violence. Like if two men are in
39:31
a room and one man starts insulting
39:33
this other person really viciously
39:36
and talking about their life and their family and all
39:38
kinds of crazy shit that people do online, there's
39:41
a probability, it's more than 0% that
39:44
this is gonna result in violence. But
39:47
there's zero possibility of it online.
39:49
It's just a free shot. And
39:52
that's a part of the problem as well, is that it's
39:55
not a real human interaction.
39:58
So you're getting like these little doses. of
40:00
shittiness from people, but you're not getting this one
40:02
burst where you and this guy are about to
40:04
throw down because he's like,
40:06
he's insulting you to the point where like this
40:09
person is actually dangerous. Like this is actually,
40:11
this person hates me. Like this could
40:13
be a real bad situation here. And
40:15
I think much like that
40:17
exists on Twitter where you have these little
40:19
shitty interactions, it's like 1% of real hate
40:22
and it just adds up over time. That's
40:24
the same thing as seeing violence, seeing
40:26
all these executions, seeing all these botched
40:29
robberies, seeing all these people that get
40:31
murdered in some third world
40:33
country. You
40:35
just get a little tiny piece of it
40:38
all the time and it normalizes it. It's
40:41
probably really, really bad for us.
40:45
Do you pay attention to what people say about you online? No. You
40:48
never do that? No. You never
40:51
search for Joe Rogan and never? Nope. Nope.
40:54
Shouldn't do it. Yeah. It's
40:56
not good for you. It's not good for you because I've done it on occasion.
41:00
It's nothing but if you want
41:02
to just destroy your self
41:04
image, you could do it pretty quickly. Well that's what
41:06
they want. That's what people want to do when
41:08
they say things like that. Like this is my opinion. And
41:10
you know, a lot of it is like really out of
41:12
line. Like a lot of it is
41:14
just like the worst possible, like I said before, like
41:17
the least charitable takes, the least
41:19
nuanced, this ridiculous caricature of
41:21
a human being just to
41:24
try to demonize
41:28
them to make yourself look
41:30
virtually or virtuously superior.
41:33
It's just dumb. It's a dumb way for people
41:35
to communicate and the kind of people that do it are
41:38
all losers. There's no like really
41:40
exceptional, fascinating people that engage in that kind
41:42
of stuff. Well the thing that gets me,
41:44
I don't mind, when people insult
41:46
me, I don't care. I'm
41:49
used to it. It's the lies.
41:51
Like when I see something about myself that's
41:54
just a straight up lie. Totally
41:56
made up. And then it picks up
41:58
traction and people are sometimes. It could be
42:00
someone photoshopping a tweet that I never said
42:03
or whatever, anything. That
42:06
stuff still
42:08
bothers me. Then
42:11
I try to tell myself, it shouldn't bother me. But at the same
42:13
time, it should. It's normal for a
42:15
person to be bothered when you're
42:18
being lied about and other people are believing
42:20
a lie. I think it's a normal human
42:22
reaction that I'm like, I don't want... That's
42:24
not fair. It's not true. You
42:26
could attack me for things that I really have said and done. You
42:29
can't do that. That's not true. But
42:33
then at a certain point, you just have to sort of give
42:35
into it and realize this is the way the internet
42:37
works, I guess. Well,
42:39
it's also who knows who's doing it. And at
42:42
this point in time, we have to accept the
42:44
reality of propaganda. And
42:46
that there... We've talked about
42:48
this ad nauseam, but I'll say it again.
42:50
There was an FBI, a former analyst did
42:53
some sort of a study on Twitter where
42:56
he was estimating the amount of bots
42:58
versus... This is right around the time when Elon was
43:00
saying that it's more than 5%. He
43:02
said he thinks it's about 80%. He thinks
43:05
80% of the accounts. Yeah, 80% of the
43:07
accounts are fake accounts, which
43:09
just stop and think about if you're
43:11
in a country. Let's
43:14
imagine you want the politics of
43:16
America to swing in a certain
43:19
direction because we most certainly
43:21
do this in other countries. We
43:23
don't have to educate people on
43:25
the long history of interventionalist foreign
43:28
policy where we have gone in
43:30
and installed new leaders
43:32
of countries and organized
43:35
all kinds of shit. So we
43:37
do it, and we do it, and we know they do
43:39
it. But isn't it like the cheapest way to do it?
43:41
Wouldn't it be to do it on social media? And
43:43
if you did it, why would you do it like one account?
43:45
Why wouldn't you have a million accounts? I would have a million
43:48
accounts. Like you just got to get a computer
43:50
that keeps making new accounts. When
43:52
you run a program, it's not the most difficult thing
43:54
to do. For people that know how to actually code
43:56
operating systems, you don't think there's someone out there that
43:58
can code a computer program. that can
44:01
operate millions of different Twitter accounts
44:03
and you run it through some
44:05
sort of AI
44:07
that you've developed some large language model on
44:09
things to say about MAGA or things to
44:11
say about abortion or things to say about
44:13
Conservatives or things to say about liberals and
44:16
you put a fucking American flag and you're
44:18
a little bio and or you put a
44:20
pronoun thing he her zeezer whatever
44:22
it is and then you just
44:25
flood the internet with fake anger
44:27
and fake discourse and
44:29
you lie about people and you
44:32
Anytime there's a post about anything controversial you
44:34
insert something in there that gets people even
44:36
more riled up You could
44:38
get people you could swing the vote you could
44:40
swing the vote in one way or another especially
44:42
with fence sitters With people that are
44:44
not sure like I don't know is Trump really
44:46
the answer and then you get online and you
44:49
see all this hateful shit or you
44:51
might get on a MAGA forum you know the There
44:54
are they are eating cats He
44:56
was telling the truth ABC's biased and you could
44:58
swing it one way or the other and I
45:00
think they're all trying to manipulate it all
45:03
these foreign Governments and I think internally in
45:05
the United States I'm sure there are groups
45:07
that are doing it too that are manipulating
45:09
things in one way or the other in
45:12
a disingenuous way because it's Available and
45:15
I don't know how to stop it. I think the only
45:17
way for you to not personally be
45:19
really Affected
45:22
by it is you have to understand that it
45:24
exists and then you have to Recognize
45:27
that you know some of these takes are not
45:29
even real human beings So instead of saying Jesus
45:31
Christ people who think that way go Maybe
45:34
not like maybe this isn't maybe there's a few
45:36
people to think that way But you're being led
45:38
to believe that it's a huge movement of people
45:40
when it might not be but the problem is
45:42
when it Even if it's
45:44
fake people are so stupid that even if
45:46
it's a fake thing That becomes
45:48
a bit of a movement online with fake
45:50
dumb people will jump in there and then
45:53
it'll become a real thing Yeah,
45:55
like you're aware of the the
45:57
free bleeding movement that Chan
46:00
pushed. Yeah, I
46:02
think I heard of that. It became kind of
46:04
real, didn't it? It became real, that's what I'm
46:07
saying. Or flat earth is the same thing. It
46:09
became a joke if people were fucking around at
46:11
first. We've known the earth has not been flat
46:13
for a long ass time and
46:15
then... But now that's totally real, right? Now
46:17
it's totally real. Now there's massive groups of
46:19
people that think the earth is flat. Which
46:21
isn't... I can't. I can't. I don't
46:24
know how that... Yeah. Yeah, you can't. But
46:26
the thing is, that's how dumb people are.
46:29
That you can have a fake thing and
46:31
say it enough times and enough people jump
46:33
in and be on board with it
46:35
and then it becomes a real thing. And then you don't
46:37
even have to use propaganda anymore.
46:39
These morons are doing it for you. The
46:42
thing that gets me about the flat earth thing is... Because
46:44
I didn't realize that it was a real thing until, I don't know, a
46:46
few years ago. I did. I
46:49
posted something about it. And
46:51
all these comments from real
46:54
people that... What gets
46:56
me is... Well, you have the people that say, yeah, I think
46:58
the earth's flat. And that's... You're just really stupid. But
47:01
I was more fascinated by the
47:03
80% of people who...
47:06
80% of the flat earth crowd.
47:08
80% of them, their take was, well, I'm not saying
47:14
the earth is flat, but I'm
47:17
open to it. I'm open to the
47:19
possibility. I get it if
47:22
you're just completely stupid and you got sucked into
47:24
this cult thing. But what I
47:26
don't get is how can you be on the
47:28
fence about the shape of the earth?
47:31
Well, it's just people that really are not
47:33
educated. That's number one.
47:35
And people that believe that there's
47:38
a collusion that's so large that
47:40
all of the space agencies from
47:42
Japan, from China, from Russia, all
47:45
of them are liars. That
47:47
all of them are colluding together to hide
47:50
the true shape of the earth. Because if
47:52
we really knew the earth is flat, then
47:54
it always is connected
47:57
to some sort of a Bible thing. it's
48:00
the firmament and they believe that we're
48:02
hiding the fact that God is real
48:04
and somehow there's some mass
48:07
conspiracy that all these world governments and
48:09
every person that ever was involved in
48:11
the space agencies, they've all hid from
48:13
us. Yeah. And
48:17
the moon landing, you're not a... you
48:19
believe in the moon landing, right? I used to believe in the
48:21
moon landing. You don't anymore? I had a joke in my act
48:23
about it that before COVID, I would have told you vaccines are
48:25
the most important invention in human history and after COVID, I'm like,
48:28
I don't think we went to the moon. Yeah,
48:30
I know that was in your act, but you actually think
48:32
that. I think there is a less than zero possibility that
48:34
we did not go to the moon. Oh my gosh.
48:37
I know. Why do you think we went to
48:39
the moon? Because it's exactly what you just said about... there's
48:42
a lot of reasons, but the
48:44
main thing is what you just said about the earth. The
48:48
vastness of the conspiracy that would be
48:50
required to fake that, it's
48:52
so vast that it's just... it's
48:55
a lot more incredible to believe that we faked it
48:57
than to believe that we just went... and go into
48:59
the moon, don't get... it's a massive achievement. But
49:04
I think the greatest human achievement of all time. But
49:07
even so, to fake it, would he be
49:09
even more massive? Because
49:12
not only would you need all of
49:14
these space agencies and all the different
49:16
whatever people and American institutions to be
49:18
colluding, but you'd also need foreign
49:20
governments, including adversarial foreign governments, who
49:23
at this point certainly would know we faked it and for
49:26
some reason haven't blown the lid on it. So
49:28
they're letting us take this achievement that
49:30
they know... why haven't the Russians come
49:33
out and say... All those things you're saying
49:35
are true. I don't argue with any of the things
49:37
you're saying. But one of the things that
49:39
I think you have to consider is if
49:41
it's not possible for human beings
49:44
to safely go through the Van
49:46
Allen radiation belts and out into
49:48
deep space without much protection and
49:50
face the temperatures that are on the surface of
49:52
the moon, which get up to 250 degrees and
49:54
250 degrees below zero in the shadows. There's
50:00
no environment there. It's hostile,
50:02
beyond belief. Micro meteorites
50:04
are flying into the moon all the time. They're
50:07
flying through space all the time. We've
50:09
never had a single biological
50:11
organism go out into deep space,
50:13
pass the Van Allen radiation belts, and then
50:16
come back to Earth and come back alive,
50:18
except human beings during the
50:20
Apollo missions. Every single
50:22
space station mission, every single space
50:24
shuttle mission, all of them are inside
50:26
350 miles from the Earth's surface. The
50:30
only time human beings have ever been past
50:32
that and through the Van Allen radiation belts
50:34
was the Apollo missions. We
50:36
were the only humans that were ever able to
50:38
do that. The Russians never figured out how to
50:40
do it. No one else figured out
50:42
how to do it, but the Apollo astronauts. We
50:44
did it seven times, six successfully, from 1969 to
50:47
1972. If
50:51
you said to me, do you think that they
50:53
could fake the moon landing today, I would
50:55
say no. I would say no, no, no, no. People
50:57
are going to be able to track it. It's
51:00
very easy. They have satellites.
51:03
They're going to know everything. But
51:05
in 1969, the technology was so
51:07
crude that when they first showed
51:09
the Apollo 11 landing, they
51:12
didn't even show a direct feed to the
51:14
networks. So like if you're on CBS News,
51:17
you don't get a direct feed. What you
51:19
do is you point a camera at a
51:21
projection screen. So that's why the film looks
51:23
so shitty. The camera is pointed to a
51:25
projection screen where you see the astronauts jumping
51:27
around on the moon. And you
51:30
see this weird, grainy
51:33
third generation image, right?
51:37
And we did it, and we have never done it since.
51:39
And we've always said we're going to do it, and
51:41
no one's ever even come close. No one's ever
51:43
even gone into deep space since 1972. We
51:46
also haven't been trying. We haven't been trying. But
51:49
we always talk about going back, including Herbert
51:51
Walker Bush talked about going back. George W.
51:53
talked about going back. They all talk about
51:56
going back, but nobody ever gets anywhere. Well,
51:58
I think that's because we lost
52:00
the spirit and
52:02
hunger for discovery. We didn't just lose that. We
52:04
lost all the technology from the Saturn V rocket.
52:07
They don't even have that anymore. In fact, they
52:09
don't even have the original film. They
52:11
erased all the original footage of the Apollo
52:13
missions. So you just have copies of everything.
52:15
You could develop the technology again. You can
52:17
do all that. Sure you could. If
52:20
you can get through the Van Allen radiation
52:22
belts into deep space with human beings and
52:24
have them safely come back. But I think
52:26
what you're describing to me, all that does
52:29
is highlight how incredible the achievement was. If
52:32
they did it. Right. If they did
52:34
it. Well, here's the main point. There's
52:37
no evidence because saying
52:40
that it was a hoax is
52:42
an assertion of it's not just
52:45
denying an event. You're asserting a whole
52:47
other event that you say happened instead.
52:50
And there is evidence that we
52:53
went to the moon. Now someone
52:55
who's a skeptic might say, it's not enough
52:57
evidence or it's not good evidence. There's like
52:59
evidence. There's eyewitnesses. There's people that went and
53:01
came back and told us. There's
53:04
footage. There's a lot. There is
53:06
evidence. But there's no evidence of the
53:08
hoax. No one has come and said,
53:10
here's my affirmative evidence that
53:12
this hoax happened. It's
53:14
never happened as
53:17
far as I'm aware. No one's ever provided that evidence. I
53:19
see what you're trying to say. The
53:22
evidence that they went to the moon,
53:24
there's a bunch. There's moon rocks. That's
53:27
one. There's lunar reflectors that they placed
53:29
on the moon. That's another. And
53:32
there's a couple of problems with those. First
53:34
of all, the Soviets put laser
53:38
reflectors on the moon as well. And
53:40
also, the moon itself, in many places where
53:42
you shine lasers on it, it bounces back
53:45
by itself. The reflective quality of the moon,
53:47
the reason why the moon is so
53:49
bright and white in the sky when the sun hits it, there's
53:51
a certain amount of, you get a
53:53
certain amount of bounce back off of different things
53:56
with lasers. There's
53:58
some photographs that are interesting. What
54:00
was it was the India? What was the
54:02
one where they got the most high resolution
54:05
photos of the lander? Wikipedia
54:07
right now of all third-party evidence
54:09
of the Apollo mission one
54:12
of things that's interesting is they gave a moon rock
54:14
to Was it
54:16
a prime minister of Holland is that what it was
54:18
which one was the moon rock they gave it turned
54:20
out to be petrified wood So
54:22
the Apollo astronauts gave a moon
54:24
rock to some foreign dignitary and
54:27
it turned out to be a piece of petrified
54:29
wood They
54:31
do have samples of moon
54:34
rocks that came from the moon But
54:36
we also have those on earth in fact, we're on
54:38
brawn in 1968
54:41
I believe went to an artica. There's all
54:43
these photographs of him in Antarctica Antarctica is
54:45
a great place to take moon rocks because
54:48
Antarctica is just just gigantic sheet of white
54:50
and you can spot the meteorites in the
54:52
ground. So this is the photo And
54:55
this is from what what is this from? What
54:58
is the So
55:00
this is an India India Indian space
55:03
research organizations I don't know how to
55:05
say that word Shandrayaan
55:07
to orbiter captured
55:09
images of NASA's Apollo 11 and
55:12
12 landing sites and lunar modules
55:14
from a hundred kilometer altitude Apollo
55:17
12 image astronaut boots tracks are still
55:19
even visible due to the recent interest in
55:21
another post I shared decided
55:23
download out of view the raw
55:25
imagery So that looks like there's
55:28
some kind of thing on the
55:30
moon. It's pretty good evidence. It is
55:32
evidence of something's on the moon It's not evidence of
55:34
human beings went through the moon. See
55:36
we have things that are on the moon. We
55:38
have things on Mars right now Well, I think
55:40
it's things that were we would shot things into
55:42
space for sure Yeah, but it's evidence. It's
55:45
not proof in and of itself, but it is
55:47
evidence Listen, I'm not saying we didn't go to
55:49
the moon What I'm saying is the subject is
55:52
complex and it's not even a little complex. It's
55:54
really complex There's a documentary called the
55:56
funny thing happened on the way to the moon this
55:58
guy Bart Sabrel. He's been obsessed He was
56:00
a yes on the show too. Been obsessed about this his
56:02
whole life and absolutely believes that we never went to the
56:04
moon. And there's
56:07
enough shit that you go, okay, if he's
56:09
right about any of these things, it's weird.
56:12
One of the things was some of the photographs of the
56:14
moon, they ran through one of those AI
56:17
detectors that can tell you whether or
56:19
not something's false or artificially generated. And
56:23
it showed different images from, I think it
56:25
was a Chinese satellite of the moon. They
56:27
said this is legitimate, but then it got
56:29
to these Apollo images and they said these
56:31
have been doctored. This AI program, they ran...
56:33
Who's a Pussa? This AI program that they ran... All the images
56:35
or a few of them? A few of them. But
56:38
then other ones were found to be authentic. I don't think so.
56:40
I think they only ran a few images through. See
56:42
if you can find those Jamie. Find what they
56:44
did. Again, this is not saying that we didn't
56:47
go to the moon. It could be. And
56:49
this was a fact with the Gemini 15 program
56:52
where Michael Collins, there was a
56:54
photograph of Michael Collins that they
56:56
took in one
56:58
of his training exercises where he
57:01
had those packs
57:03
that they put on where they can move around while they're doing
57:05
moonwalks, not
57:08
moonwalks, spacewalks outside of where they're connected
57:10
by a tether. And
57:12
he was in this harness and
57:14
manipulating this device. And what they
57:16
had done is taken a photograph
57:18
of him training and then someone,
57:21
probably some overzealous PR person, had
57:23
taken that photograph and then blacked
57:25
out the background and tried
57:28
to pass it off as a
57:30
really clear photograph of him out
57:33
there on a spacewalk, which is probably very difficult
57:35
to get. You'd have to have another person at
57:37
the camera frame it right. They had this photo.
57:39
They're like, look, he did it. Let's just
57:41
pass this off as the real thing. Which
57:43
is, you're also talking about the Nixon administration
57:46
where they were just full of shit constantly.
57:49
Yes. Yeah.
57:53
So there's different video where they
57:55
ran it through and they
57:57
said it was real and it was that it was a
58:00
the Chinese program, but
58:02
when they ran the American ones, the American images,
58:04
they said that they were doctored. Again,
58:06
it doesn't mean that we didn't
58:09
go to the moon, but it does mean, okay,
58:11
there's that. That's weird. Have
58:13
you ever seen the Apollo 11 post-flight press conference? Yeah.
58:16
It looks like a hostage video. It looks like
58:18
a bunch of guys who don't want to be
58:20
there. They look real fucking nervous and they look
58:23
real deceptive. If you watch that video, it's weird.
58:26
But I think that's just, that's the temperament it requires
58:28
to do something like that. It's crazy. It's
58:31
almost suicidal to go to the moon. You
58:34
have to be barely even a
58:36
human psychologically to
58:38
do it. That to
58:40
me is just like, and they just went through this whole experience, but
58:42
who knows what that does to the human psyche? To
58:46
even just be in the vastness of
58:48
space, even on the space station, I
58:50
feel like that would change me as
58:52
a person. Not necessarily for
58:54
the best. There's actually a psychological condition
58:56
that they talk about, this sort of
58:58
understanding that we're all connected. It's
59:02
akin to a religious experience that many astronauts get
59:04
when they go up to the space station and
59:06
look down at the earth and go, oh my
59:08
God, what are we doing? We're all together in
59:11
this thing and we're so alone in the universe.
59:13
For us to be fighting over these trivial differences
59:15
and these stupid lines in the dirt that we
59:17
draw, when we are just clinging
59:19
to this ball in the middle of everything. So
59:23
then what would you say, or someone who is a
59:26
full on believer? Not a full on believer.
59:28
Someone who is a full on believer in the moon hoax.
59:31
What would they say to my
59:33
other point that there
59:36
is evidence we went to the moon, you can try to nitpick
59:39
the evidence. There is zero evidence
59:41
of a hoax because that's a whole other
59:43
event that would have had to have happened.
59:46
There is no evidence at all, not one
59:48
sliver of evidence ever of that hoax having
59:50
ever happened. But
59:53
I think that's a weird way to frame it. Is
59:55
there evidence of a hoax of
59:57
the JFK assassination that... Harvey
1:00:00
Oswald acted alone? Do you think there's evidence? Well,
1:00:03
but the event itself being that
1:00:05
JFK was killed happened. Right,
1:00:08
but that's not the conspiracy. So the
1:00:10
conspiracy is, did he act alone? And
1:00:13
is there evidence that he didn't act alone? What do you think?
1:00:18
I'm very skeptical that he acted alone, yeah.
1:00:20
Right. But I don't know what happened.
1:00:22
I don't know exactly what happened, nobody does. Exactly. Same
1:00:25
exact perspective. Same exact perspective
1:00:27
about this moon thing. It
1:00:30
may have happened, but this
1:00:32
was a time of deep deception in
1:00:34
the American world. This is a time
1:00:36
after Operation Northwoods, this is a time
1:00:38
after the Kennedy assassination, this is a
1:00:40
time, I mean, this is
1:00:43
a weird fucking shaky time in terms
1:00:45
of propaganda. This is after Eisenhower warned
1:00:47
about the military industrial complex. This is
1:00:49
like, there was a lot of deception.
1:00:51
Gulf of Tonkin incident. There's a lot
1:00:53
of open deception that the American
1:00:55
people were being subject to. And then there's this
1:00:57
Cold War between us and Russia. This
1:01:00
space war for superiority. We
1:01:03
wanted it so bad, we brought in Nazis. But
1:01:06
I think, I mean, the JFK is an
1:01:08
interesting example. Because
1:01:10
yes, there are things that I'm skeptical of that are claimed that
1:01:12
I don't really have evidence that the thing didn't happen, or that
1:01:15
it didn't happen the way they say, but I'm still skeptical. So
1:01:17
I get that. But it
1:01:19
feels different to me because the JFK
1:01:21
assassination did happen. The question is,
1:01:23
how did it happen? But
1:01:25
if we're going to assert that a
1:01:28
major historical event and probably
1:01:30
the greatest, the most significant historical event in history over one
1:01:32
of them did not happen at all,
1:01:35
no one did it, then like I
1:01:37
said, so what you're actually
1:01:39
claiming is that some other thing, they
1:01:42
went somewhere and they pulled off this hoax and they planned
1:01:44
it and they did, like an event happened where they were
1:01:46
faking it. And so
1:01:48
what I would want to see,
1:01:51
has anybody come out, any whistleblower ever
1:01:53
to say, hey, I was involved in
1:01:55
the shoot or I'm in Hollywood,
1:01:57
I talked to a guy who was there. Well,
1:02:00
that's not even evidence. Real
1:02:03
evidence would be some sort of documentation, some
1:02:05
sort of a way to go
1:02:07
over like there's a
1:02:12
binary code that shows the distance between
1:02:14
the Earth and the lunar module at
1:02:16
every stage of the journey. But
1:02:19
that's missing. That stuff's
1:02:22
missing. All the tracking data, they can't find
1:02:24
it. All the original footage
1:02:26
is missing. And that could just be people who
1:02:28
are really bad with historical items. That's possible. But
1:02:32
to say that faking
1:02:34
the moon landing would be a bigger
1:02:36
achievement than actually going to
1:02:38
the moon, I would say
1:02:41
only if people could actually go to the moon. So
1:02:43
here's the question. Can we really, everyone
1:02:46
wants to dismiss it, can we really
1:02:48
send a biological entity into space, go
1:02:50
through that radiation, which is thick,
1:02:54
covering the Earth and have it come back alive? Well,
1:02:58
supposedly, this is
1:03:00
the only time people had done it. And supposedly,
1:03:02
the way they did it was by going through
1:03:04
the top area of the Earth where
1:03:08
the Van Allen radiation belts, it's like kind
1:03:10
of like a doughnut that covers the Earth.
1:03:13
It's not uniform. And there's
1:03:15
an area at the top where you can go out. But
1:03:18
according to Bartz and Braille, they didn't go that way
1:03:20
because you would have had to launch from Antarctica to
1:03:22
do that. It's not really possible that that happened, that
1:03:24
they went that way. So
1:03:26
he thinks that if they did go through that,
1:03:29
there is no other examples of living things
1:03:34
that have done that and come back alive. And they've
1:03:36
known that this is an issue. They've known that this
1:03:39
Van Allen radiation belt, which is this
1:03:42
band of heavy radiation that covers the
1:03:44
Earth and protects us, they've
1:03:46
known that it's out there because they tried to blow
1:03:48
it up once. There was a
1:03:50
thing called Operation Starfish Prime where they launched
1:03:54
one of several nuclear bombs
1:03:57
into the radiation belt to try to blow
1:03:59
a hole through. it and
1:04:01
unfortunately that happened 60 67 maybe
1:04:03
was starfish prime
1:04:05
but it did the opposite
1:04:11
effect why did they do that just for the
1:04:13
wanted to see what happens and giggles well they
1:04:15
were they had so much power and you know
1:04:17
you've got nuclear bombs and you can't blow people
1:04:19
up but you're still doing studies so they're doing
1:04:21
tests all throughout Nevada and they I mean that's
1:04:23
what killed John Wayne John Wayne got cancer because
1:04:25
he was working on a set doing a Western
1:04:28
right next to where they were blowing up nuclear bombs the
1:04:30
like 200 people on his on
1:04:33
his on the set got cancer starfish prime
1:04:35
high altitude nuclear test conducted by the United
1:04:37
States a joint effort of the atomic energy
1:04:39
Commission and the Defense Atomic Support Agency
1:04:41
July 9th 1962 so this is like while Kennedy
1:04:46
was in office they were trying to figure
1:04:48
out how to we will get to the
1:04:51
moon not in this decade but in the
1:04:53
other or whatever he said high altitude
1:04:55
nuclear test so the thing you did
1:04:58
unfortunately was it supercharged
1:05:00
the bands and it
1:05:02
made it much have much more radiation
1:05:05
not only that it it blew
1:05:07
out power in some parts of Hawaii
1:05:09
I think I think it cooked
1:05:11
it cooked a few satellites right we
1:05:13
talked about this the other day it cooked a few
1:05:16
satellites okay so can I ask this though do
1:05:18
we have examples we're
1:05:21
saying well we don't know if a human can go
1:05:23
through the right I would
1:05:25
say well we do know because they did if they
1:05:27
did well but
1:05:29
if we're gonna we know they sent people into
1:05:31
near-earth orbit that's a fact we know that well
1:05:34
how do we know that if we don't know
1:05:36
I mean maybe this because we actually can see
1:05:38
that we can see where they launched
1:05:40
you can follow the trajectory you can know
1:05:42
about the propulsion units that they use you
1:05:44
know about what they were trying to accomplish
1:05:46
and you could watch it so my question
1:05:48
is have we tried to
1:05:51
send humans through the radiation belt and
1:05:53
not been able to has that
1:05:56
happened they never even tried that they
1:05:58
just did it Right.
1:06:01
That's what's even crazier. But how do we know they did
1:06:03
it? If they
1:06:05
only time they did it, the last time they did it was
1:06:07
1972. You
1:06:10
don't think that's a little weird? Not
1:06:12
really. No, no, no, listen, listen. Even
1:06:14
if they did go to the moon, let's say, I'll
1:06:16
say they went to the moon, it's fucking weird. Everything
1:06:20
from 1969 is easier, cheaper, and
1:06:22
faster to reproduce today except
1:06:24
the moon landing, except space travel. I just don't think
1:06:26
there's a will. But we thought, what? I don't
1:06:29
think there's a will. How much fucking resources there is
1:06:31
on the moon? Do you know how many valuable minerals
1:06:33
are on the moon? And trillions of dollars of things
1:06:35
that are very difficult to find in the United States
1:06:37
are on the moon? I don't think the American ...
1:06:39
The people, in the
1:06:42
1960s, the American people cared deeply about
1:06:44
going to the moon. I don't think
1:06:46
that these days, I think we should
1:06:48
care about that, but most people don't care about ... If
1:06:51
we found out that we didn't have to
1:06:53
dig for lithium, that we
1:06:55
could just go to the moon and pull giant
1:06:58
chunks of it out and not have slave labor
1:07:00
and no one has to feel bad about using
1:07:02
your iPhone. You don't think that
1:07:04
they would do that? Of course they would
1:07:06
do that, if they could. If you could have a
1:07:08
mining station on the moon, no problem at all, totally
1:07:11
safe, of course they would do that.
1:07:13
Yeah. And I think ... It only takes two weeks
1:07:16
to get there. People mine in
1:07:18
northern territories, like people in mine
1:07:20
in Canada in these horrible conditions, fucking
1:07:22
freezing cold out. It
1:07:24
probably takes a lot of time to get
1:07:27
to a point where you can do that
1:07:29
consistently. Right, but it's so valuable. The
1:07:31
idea that they wouldn't do that and they haven't done
1:07:33
anything even remotely close to that since 1972 is weird.
1:07:38
I agree that it's ... I
1:07:40
mean, weird makes it sound necessarily nefarious.
1:07:42
I think it's ... No,
1:07:44
just weird. It's very
1:07:47
unusual. It's unusual technologically. It's
1:07:49
incongruent. It's incongruent with technological
1:07:51
progression. We
1:07:53
have that with everything else. Everything else. Phones
1:07:55
are in your fucking pocket now and they
1:07:58
have more computing power than the entire cluster
1:08:00
that they used to launch
1:08:02
the Apollo program. The
1:08:04
Apollo program was a fucking giant room full
1:08:07
of computers. Your phone is significantly
1:08:09
more powerful than that. Everything
1:08:11
else got better, except that. We thought that people were going
1:08:13
to be going to space all the time. You ever watch
1:08:15
that TV show Space 1999 when you were a kid? You're
1:08:19
younger than me. There was a stupid show called Space
1:08:21
1999 and they thought, boy, by 1999 we'll
1:08:24
be flying around spaceships and people will be living on
1:08:26
the moon. Every time
1:08:28
they've done in the past, after the
1:08:31
moon landings, every time they did any
1:08:33
sort of science fiction movie, it always
1:08:36
involved colonies already established on the moon
1:08:38
and on Mars and people traveling.
1:08:40
Because we thought that was going to
1:08:42
happen. Orville and Wilbur Wright, right? Think
1:08:45
about the launch of the first
1:08:47
airplane and then the launch of
1:08:49
the Apollo program. It's only like
1:08:51
60 years. It's
1:08:53
kind of crazy. The launch
1:08:55
of the first airplane ever
1:08:58
and dropping nuclear bombs out
1:09:00
of an airplane is only like, what is it,
1:09:02
50 years? I think it's something
1:09:04
like 50, something kooky. Yeah. 50,
1:09:07
60 years. That's nuts. I agree.
1:09:09
But then now you have supersonic jets, like 100 years later. Now
1:09:12
you have insane capabilities of
1:09:15
like Air Force fighter jets.
1:09:17
Unbelievable power and maneuverability
1:09:19
far beyond anything anybody would
1:09:22
have possibly imagined when Orville
1:09:24
and Wilbur had that stupid
1:09:27
fucking bird looking flimsy thing.
1:09:29
So everything progresses technologically, except
1:09:32
... Well, but
1:09:34
here's what I would say to that. Except traveling
1:09:36
to other planets. I would say two things. Number
1:09:38
one, I think that it just, it does
1:09:40
take ... Yeah, we're kind
1:09:43
of spoiled by the fact that there was
1:09:45
this burst of incredible technological advancement. In everything.
1:09:48
Right. In automobiles. It doesn't necessarily
1:09:50
... Not every facet of technology is going
1:09:52
to continue at that pace forever into an
1:09:55
infinity. So I think it does take,
1:09:58
especially if you take a historical perspective, a longer term
1:10:00
historical perspective, it just takes a while to get from one
1:10:02
thing to the next. It hasn't even been that long. I
1:10:04
mean, 1969 was not that long ago from the historical perspective.
1:10:11
And especially if you want to do the next thing, I mean,
1:10:14
what's the next thing? The next thing is to go to Mars.
1:10:17
Most people agree. That's
1:10:19
so much far exponentially farther away
1:10:21
and harder to do. And
1:10:24
so if it takes decades more to figure out
1:10:26
how to do that, that doesn't seem that crazy
1:10:28
to me. And the second thing I'll say
1:10:30
is that I do think, I get
1:10:32
your point about resources on the moon, there's a reason to go back.
1:10:34
I agree, practically
1:10:37
speaking. But it's
1:10:39
just true that it requires a
1:10:42
society that deeply values
1:10:45
exploration for its own sake and is willing
1:10:47
to make the sacrifices, is willing
1:10:49
to send people
1:10:51
off to do things just for the sake of
1:10:54
exploration, knowing that they might die. I think we
1:10:56
have almost no appetite for that
1:10:58
now. Maybe
1:11:00
the Challenger explosion was, you could
1:11:03
point to that as the time when we sort of
1:11:05
just, we have no appetite for people. We
1:11:07
don't want people to die for this anymore. I see what you're saying. Here's
1:11:09
the problem with what you're saying. The American people don't
1:11:12
get to say, and whether or not we do things,
1:11:14
like they don't get to say, and whether or not we make
1:11:16
a space shuttle. They don't get
1:11:19
to decide whether or not we establish a
1:11:21
new space station. No one
1:11:23
talks about it. They just do it. We
1:11:25
barely get a say in how much money goes to Ukraine.
1:11:28
Yeah, but it's got to be funded. Right, but how much is
1:11:30
funded to go to Ukraine? All of a sudden, they
1:11:32
had $175 billion plus to fund this proxy war. Who
1:11:39
decided that? It wasn't the American people.
1:11:42
It wasn't, but politicians are the ones who
1:11:44
decided. People vote for those politicians. Unfortunately, there
1:11:46
are a lot of Americans who are basically
1:11:49
okay with sending money to Ukraine, which they
1:11:51
shouldn't be. It's insane. I agree with you.
1:11:53
The point is, is that if you
1:11:55
had a skillful politician who got on
1:11:57
television and explained that we have found
1:14:00
terrified of getting Under
1:14:03
the sights of the intelligence agencies And if
1:14:05
you have top-secret clearance if you're involved in
1:14:07
some sort of a project like look at
1:14:09
the Manhattan project People kept their fucking mouth
1:14:11
shut they they knew they had
1:14:14
they were working on something of Importance that
1:14:16
was above and beyond their need to yap
1:14:18
about shit, but you but for the moon
1:14:20
landing you would need way more people involved
1:14:22
I don't know more institutions because you actually
1:14:24
have a real space program so the space
1:14:26
program is not fake right so let's just
1:14:28
assume I'm a non-believer. I
1:14:30
would tell you that the space
1:14:33
program was absolutely real the Saturn
1:14:35
5 rocket was absolutely real the
1:14:38
Modules though the way they were able to parachute
1:14:40
down into the ocean a hundred percent real they
1:14:42
did go into space But how far
1:14:44
did they go this is the real question and Bart
1:14:48
Sibrel the guy who made this
1:14:50
documentary he asserts that they went
1:14:52
somewhere into Earth's orbit Like
1:14:55
you know in space But not through
1:14:57
the van island radiation belt radiation belts
1:14:59
and not to the surface of the
1:15:01
moon and back and that they had
1:15:03
video footage that they had done in
1:15:06
some Scenario
1:15:08
some people think it's in the Nevada desert
1:15:10
who knows what it is But they had this footage of
1:15:13
people bounce it around and they said they got it on
1:15:15
the moon And then they brought this back does
1:15:17
yet, but does he have any evidence of? That
1:15:21
event occurring what would he say
1:15:23
well? I know they only went so far and came
1:15:25
back because I because of this well he
1:15:27
has a bunch of different things and one
1:15:30
of them is the one that's like very
1:15:32
hotly debated and it's the Different
1:15:35
light sources in the photographs so a lot of
1:15:37
the photographs from the surface of the moon have
1:15:39
intersecting light Intersecting shadows
1:15:42
so you have a shadow that's going this way and another shadow
1:15:44
that's going that way indicating more than one Light
1:15:47
source or a close by light source. That's
1:15:49
you know coming in not something That's you
1:15:51
know thousands millions of miles away like the
1:15:53
like the Sun There's
1:15:55
those there's the photographs. There's the photographs that
1:15:57
run through AI he has this other video
1:16:00
of what looks like them filming
1:16:02
the earth through one of the
1:16:04
round portal windows with everything blacked
1:16:06
out in the cabin and
1:16:09
then they pull down the things that
1:16:11
were blocking off the other light sources
1:16:13
and the cabin floods with light and
1:16:15
it looks like they're in near-earth orbit
1:16:17
and it's very confusing because you're like
1:16:19
well what is that video what exactly
1:16:21
is going on there because if they
1:16:23
really are in deep space and they
1:16:25
really are filming this small image of
1:16:27
the earth because that's all they can
1:16:30
see from 200,000 miles out well why
1:16:34
when they take those things down does it
1:16:37
look like the whole cabin is filled with
1:16:39
light why is it why does it look
1:16:41
exactly like they're in near-earth orbit that
1:16:43
but that still goes back ever seen it the
1:16:47
specific you want to see it sure for
1:16:49
shits and giggles yeah because we're in
1:16:51
the middle of this stupid conversation it's a fun one
1:16:54
it's one of the most fun of all
1:16:56
conspiracy theories because if they did it
1:16:59
wow first of all if
1:17:02
they killed the president wow and they it seems
1:17:04
like they kind of did that so if
1:17:06
they did this too like what else
1:17:09
did they do like what other hoaxes were played
1:17:11
on on the American people if this is real
1:17:14
that's why it's fun I'm not saying it's real but
1:17:17
it is is a fun one it's
1:17:19
not as simple as the earth is
1:17:21
flat that's a stupid one but this
1:17:23
is a fun one this is a
1:17:25
fun one because you're you're dealing with
1:17:27
the kind of power with complete control
1:17:29
over the media complete control over newspapers
1:17:31
and what they reported the interest of
1:17:34
you know national security the
1:17:36
Cold War with Russia the space
1:17:38
war with Russia we
1:17:40
wanted it so bad we brought in some of
1:17:42
the most heinous human beings that
1:17:44
have ever lived to run our
1:17:46
NASA program yeah it's not as
1:17:49
it's not as dumb as flat earth but it
1:17:51
does remind to me it reminds me of to
1:17:53
me it's in the vein of like Sandy
1:17:56
Hook was a hoax no no
1:17:58
no that's heinous Let's not morally
1:18:00
not more. Let me show you the video. Let me show
1:18:02
you the video Jamie you got that Funny
1:18:05
thing happened on the way to the moon. No, but I
1:18:07
can't is he hiding it. I know
1:18:10
it's available. Sure sure I I'm
1:18:13
not even I have to figure out exactly what the videos I'm
1:18:15
looking for Proof I
1:18:17
know I'm trying to I'm digging through I pick
1:18:19
a video. I try to find it's not in there I have to
1:18:21
find another video. It's not like okay. You'll
1:18:23
find the exact name of the video Okay,
1:18:26
you'll find it he'll find it once he does
1:18:28
again, I'm not saying we didn't go I'm saying
1:18:31
this is a fun one And it's a weird
1:18:33
one There's there's a lot
1:18:35
of weirdness to it. Isn't it similar? Okay,
1:18:37
because a lot of this comes from It's
1:18:40
such a it's it's such an incredible
1:18:42
feat That's so difficult to do that. It's hard
1:18:45
to believe anyone actually did it sure which
1:18:47
I can understand that mentality
1:18:50
But the thing is you can go back in history and
1:18:54
you could look at In for
1:18:56
the sake of discovery and exploration you can look
1:18:58
at what other men have done hundreds of years
1:19:00
ago That arguably is more
1:19:02
impressive than going to the moon like what
1:19:06
I mean You
1:19:08
name it like take any take any famous
1:19:10
Explorer from like the 1500s to the 1800s
1:19:16
And whether it's Magellan or James Cook or
1:19:18
Christopher Columbus or any of them What
1:19:22
they were able to do navigating this vast
1:19:24
ocean going to play having no modern technology
1:19:26
at all Being able to go
1:19:28
from where they're starting point hit some little tiny
1:19:30
island Somewhere and then go around and navigating a
1:19:33
world that they don't even know what it looks
1:19:35
like. They have no maps They have no GPS.
1:19:37
They have nothing at all. I
1:19:40
cannot conceive of How
1:19:42
they could have ever done that? I don't know how
1:19:44
in the world not knowing what the
1:19:46
world looks like having no map having no GPS
1:19:48
having no modern navigation whatsoever how in the world
1:19:50
could you possibly get on a ship in
1:19:52
you know launching out of France or Portugal
1:19:54
or wherever and Make
1:19:57
it anywhere across the ocean. How could you
1:19:59
I don't know how you could It's incredible,
1:20:01
but it's incredible, but we know that it
1:20:03
happened. Okay, it's incredible But it
1:20:05
doesn't come it doesn't compare because they do it now
1:20:07
easily So anybody can
1:20:09
get in a ship right now and travel you
1:20:11
can get a small boat That
1:20:13
you have enough resources and you have enough gas
1:20:16
and you could travel through these routes you can
1:20:18
do it It took them hundreds of years, but
1:20:20
you can do it right now. So it's way
1:20:22
easier to do now, right? So it's something that
1:20:24
they did that's incredible. No doubt
1:20:27
no argument, but something that could be reproduced
1:20:29
today easily But at
1:20:31
least at least possibly I wouldn't say easily it's it's all
1:20:33
it's a task But it also took centuries to get to
1:20:35
the point where it could be easily But
1:20:38
it got better right after each one did
1:20:40
it because they had maps now and then
1:20:42
they also used their sextants and they understood
1:20:44
constellations in a way that most people don't
1:20:46
today and Sextants are if you actually use
1:20:49
them correctly and you understand which way the
1:20:51
the tides go and which way the the
1:20:53
water currents are going Which way the flow
1:20:55
is happening. They had a deep
1:20:57
understanding of the currents of the earth They knew
1:21:00
travel rains like travel lanes and they knew
1:21:02
which ways they could go with ships So
1:21:04
applying that to the open ocean applying that
1:21:07
to the these continents. They weren't even sure
1:21:09
were there It was very iffy very dangerous
1:21:11
very courageous But once they did it Then
1:21:13
everybody else could do it easier and then
1:21:16
they started doing it better and better and
1:21:18
then people started coming to America and then
1:21:20
Buh-buh-buh-buh-buh and now here we are and now
1:21:22
anybody can get in a boat anybody with
1:21:24
enough resources Can have a boat
1:21:26
that can travel those routes? No
1:21:29
one can just say I want
1:21:31
to go to the moon today and get
1:21:33
their private Mooncraft and fucking shoot
1:21:35
off into the atmosphere and land on the
1:21:37
moon So no
1:21:40
one's done that since 1969. That's
1:21:43
a recent occurrence in
1:21:45
terms of like human history But
1:21:47
not technologically the technology from 1969
1:21:49
is not even it's like cave people shit compared
1:21:52
to what we have today So
1:21:54
you really can't compare the
1:21:56
courageous amazing deeds of these
1:21:58
early explorers From
1:26:00
200,000 miles away and even though
1:26:03
they are filming it by blocking out all
1:26:05
the lights and filming it through this window
1:26:07
That actually is the the earth.
1:26:09
That's actually what it looks like when you're in
1:26:12
deep space. You could say that too You
1:26:15
just don't know and that It's
1:26:17
it's hard to figure out what's what it's hard
1:26:19
to figure out what's what when you see a
1:26:21
video like that You just go hmm. Okay. What
1:26:24
is that? and
1:26:28
I don't think it's impossible to
1:26:30
fake people going to the moon. I think
1:26:32
it'd be very difficult It would require
1:26:35
a lot of people to be on board, but
1:26:37
I also think it could be compartmentalized The
1:26:39
people that make the rockets they they you are
1:26:41
design You're what you're doing is you're making a
1:26:44
specific part and this guy's making another part and
1:26:46
you have the engineers put this thing together And
1:26:49
you launch this thing into space the people that
1:26:51
would have to know are the people that are
1:26:53
actually charting the trajectory of the
1:26:55
Apollo mission the people that are
1:26:57
actually talking to the astronauts and explains them
1:26:59
what to say during the press conference the
1:27:02
people that are engineering the
1:27:04
whole thing and you could probably get
1:27:06
away with doing something like that with a few hundred people
1:27:08
and you could get a few hundred people of High-ranking
1:27:11
people that have top-secret clearance keep their
1:27:13
mouth shut you could I would just
1:27:15
need I Would
1:27:18
need some kind of solid evidence of
1:27:20
that to believe that's true. Yeah me
1:27:22
too this to me There
1:27:24
are some things that we call conspiracy theories that
1:27:26
I think are you know clearly true
1:27:28
There are some things that we call conspiracy theories that I think
1:27:31
are maybe true But
1:27:34
there are conspiracy theories that to
1:27:36
me are just that they're just they're
1:27:38
just they're not even theories
1:27:40
really They're just kind of like fanciful
1:27:44
Whatever projections
1:27:48
and The ones that I don't find
1:27:50
convincing are where they they usually
1:27:52
start with There's
1:27:54
a so-called official narrative of a thing that happened
1:27:56
mm-hmm. There's a couple of things
1:27:59
about what actually happened that are
1:28:01
kind of weird. And
1:28:03
we look at that and go, that's a little bit weird. And
1:28:06
then the conspiracy theorists, in that case, they come in
1:28:08
and they find these little tiny
1:28:10
cracks, if you want to call it, and then inside
1:28:13
the cracks, they shove this whole like Hollywood
1:28:16
cinematic narrative that they have created
1:28:18
to explain what's actually like
1:28:20
a pretty tiny crack. You don't need
1:28:22
this whole thing to explain that. So
1:28:25
with the moon thing, I mean, one of the first, weird
1:28:30
aspects of the moon landing that I think
1:28:32
started kind of the conspiracy theories about it
1:28:34
was the flag,
1:28:36
the fact that the flag's moving in the picture. And
1:28:39
so yeah, it's like, when you look at that, you don't really understand, you look at
1:28:42
what that is weird because there's no wind on the moon. But
1:28:44
then you understand that, okay, for example,
1:28:46
when you put the flag down, it
1:28:48
creates reverberations, it makes the flag
1:28:51
move, it's gonna move for longer because
1:28:53
there's no gravity. So
1:28:55
there's an explanation for that. But
1:28:58
if you're the conspiracy theorist, then
1:29:00
you take the flag moving and you just let, you're
1:29:02
like, nope, the whole thing
1:29:04
is bunk. Have you ever seen the
1:29:06
video footage of the astronaut hopping by
1:29:08
the flag and the
1:29:11
breeze of him hopping by makes the flag
1:29:13
wiggle? He
1:29:15
doesn't touch the flag at all, the flag is
1:29:17
completely stationary, and the astronaut hops by the flag,
1:29:20
and as he hops by the flag, the flag
1:29:22
wiggles. Okay, are we saying that wouldn't happen
1:29:24
on him? No, it wouldn't, there's no air. Yeah,
1:29:28
okay, I haven't seen that. Oh, we'll show it to you.
1:29:32
It's weird, listen, what
1:29:34
you're saying is entirely correct. Everything
1:29:36
you're saying is entirely reasonable and correct if they
1:29:38
actually can get through the
1:29:41
Van Allen radiation belts. If they can, this
1:29:43
is stupid, this whole thing's stupid. But if they can't really
1:29:45
do that, and they never have done that, and the only
1:29:47
time they say they've done that is these missions, it gets
1:29:50
real weird. And
1:29:52
since they haven't done it since then, it gets real weird. And
1:29:55
it's not just that, there's other
1:29:57
video, it's not just the one where the guys. So
1:32:00
he's gonna hop by. Okay.
1:32:05
See that? Yeah, but he could have
1:32:07
hit the flag. Yeah, but he didn't. Look, look at the distance. Look
1:32:09
how far away he is from it. Pull
1:32:13
it back again. Oh. See
1:32:17
where he is? So he's in
1:32:19
front. He's way in front of
1:32:21
that thing. He paps by and it wiggles. I
1:32:24
don't know. He's in the suit. The suit's pretty clunky. Yeah,
1:32:26
but he's not close to it. Look at the perspective. Let's look
1:32:29
at it in slow motion. So watch, he
1:32:31
hops by. It just wiggles in the breeze.
1:32:34
That's a breeze, dude. So
1:32:36
that might not have actually happened on the moon, okay? That
1:32:38
might be footage that they filmed in Nevada desert. And the footage they
1:32:40
got on the moon got all fucked up. And so they tried to
1:32:43
pass that off on people and they thought that no one would know.
1:32:46
It doesn't necessarily mean we didn't go to the moon.
1:32:48
But that does look weird. And
1:32:50
it's just not, it's not one thing. If that
1:32:52
was the only thing, you'd be like, oh, well, I'm gonna go to the moon. It's
1:32:54
not one thing. If that was the only thing,
1:32:56
you'd be like, oh, well, who
1:32:59
knows? But there's a lot of them. He
1:33:02
could have hit it. I mean, he's close. It's
1:33:04
possible. It doesn't look like he hit it. It looks like a
1:33:06
breeze. Yeah, but
1:33:08
then the other part of this is that they, so what?
1:33:10
The people that went through all the struggle to fake the
1:33:12
moon landing, how would they
1:33:14
miss these things? Well,
1:33:16
I don't think they thought people would catch it.
1:33:18
First of all, you're dealing with a time where
1:33:21
there's no VHS tapes. You're dealing with the internet,
1:33:23
right? So you show it on television once. You
1:33:26
get to choose what gets shown and what doesn't get shown. You film
1:33:28
a bunch of shit. That's how
1:33:30
they got that footage of them inside the craft, filming through
1:33:32
that circular hole. Because they don't
1:33:34
air everything on television, but you have archives. So
1:33:37
you have all these archives and these kooks go through the archives.
1:33:40
They find things like that.
1:33:42
Okay, but that doesn't even mean that that was
1:33:44
actual moon footage. That could
1:33:46
have been some of the training footage. I'll tell
1:33:48
you what would convince me to, not that it's a fake,
1:33:50
but at least would make me open to it. One
1:33:53
thing that would shake my faith considerably in the
1:33:56
moon landing, if Elon
1:33:58
Musk were to come out and say, and say,
1:34:00
yeah, I don't know about this moon landing thing. Then,
1:34:02
okay, fine. Because, and I'm not saying this is my
1:34:04
whole reason for believing it happened, but Elon Musk, first
1:34:07
of all, if the moon landing was fake, he knows it was, he knows
1:34:09
it was fake. Sure. He's the richest
1:34:11
man in the world. He's shown zero
1:34:14
concern for, you know, propping up
1:34:16
official narratives at all. Right. So
1:34:18
he's a guy that would know if it's faked,
1:34:22
would, there'd be no reason for him to continue
1:34:24
that narrative if it was fake. In
1:34:26
fact, he could even say, you know, they faked it. I'm gonna do it for
1:34:28
real. I'll be the first one to go to the moon because they faked it.
1:34:32
And he hasn't said that. So I also find that to be pretty
1:34:35
compelling. The fact that he, as someone who wouldn't know,
1:34:37
let's say the problem is that you and
1:34:39
I, most people that talk about this, we have no like
1:34:41
direct access to knowledge
1:34:43
about space. This is all being given to us by
1:34:46
other people. So
1:34:48
you got to go to people that are actually working with
1:34:50
this stuff. And
1:34:54
so the fact that he has no time for this theory
1:34:57
at all, I also find to be persuasive.
1:34:59
It's good. It is persuasive, definitely.
1:35:01
But also he has a contract
1:35:03
with NASA and he has to
1:35:05
be very careful about what he says and does.
1:35:07
And for him to say something incredibly insane, like we
1:35:09
never went to the moon, even if he believes
1:35:11
it, that would be a big
1:35:14
risk with zero reward because there's no way to
1:35:16
prove, as you've said, there's no way to prove
1:35:18
that we didn't go to the moon. And
1:35:21
to say that we didn't go to the moon is
1:35:23
a kook take. Like that's, what the fuck is wrong
1:35:25
with you? You could say stupid things
1:35:27
like that when you're a comedian who's a podcast host. But
1:35:30
if you have contracts with
1:35:32
NASA and you run SpaceX and you are
1:35:34
legitimately making some of the greatest breakthroughs in
1:35:36
space travel that human beings have ever known,
1:35:39
like what they're doing with those Falcons, when
1:35:41
they have them land, fucking insane. Insane, come
1:35:43
back and land. We've never been able to
1:35:45
do that before. And it's all because of
1:35:47
Elon. I mean, if
1:35:50
he really is going to get people to Mars,
1:35:54
something is going to be addressed
1:35:56
eventually as to, you
1:35:59
know, if, if. If they do it and they pull it off
1:36:01
and it's easy and comfortable, okay, we
1:36:03
probably did it in 1969. If
1:36:06
they go to the moon and there's no problem going through
1:36:08
the Van Allen radiation belts with no particular
1:36:11
insulation other than what the spaceship had,
1:36:13
maybe. Yeah, they probably did
1:36:15
it. Well, I will say, I
1:36:17
don't even, the moon landing hoax idea
1:36:19
is, it's barely even a kook take
1:36:21
anymore. I think it is, but you're
1:36:24
probably in the majority with your take on
1:36:27
it. The
1:36:29
last time I talked about this publicly,
1:36:31
I got absolutely ripped
1:36:33
to shreds. Of course. I mean,
1:36:35
it felt like 99% against, and it's going to
1:36:38
happen again in response to this
1:36:40
conversation. 99% against you? Yeah.
1:36:42
Against your take. So most people think that we
1:36:44
didn't go to the moon. It
1:36:47
seems- Maybe that's your followers, bro. I
1:36:49
think if you get the overall internet, it would go
1:36:51
the other way. The overall internet,
1:36:54
most people would think you're a kook for
1:36:56
even entertaining the idea that we never went to the
1:36:58
moon. Maybe, but it seems
1:37:00
like it's shifting drastically. A lot of that is
1:37:02
people just have lost all faith in our institutions,
1:37:04
which I understand. Yes. So people
1:37:06
are, I mean, that was kind of the point of your bit,
1:37:09
that people are, once you see that this is a lie, this
1:37:11
is a lie. Yeah, yeah,
1:37:13
exactly. That is happening, and I'm totally sympathetic to that
1:37:15
part of it. But
1:37:19
I just think that the moon landing is, there's
1:37:21
a lot of good evidence for
1:37:23
it. And also, this
1:37:26
is an emotional argument. Yeah, it's an American thing. It's
1:37:29
one of our greatest achievements as Americans. Sure. You
1:37:31
got to pry that from my cold, dead hands. I
1:37:34
mean, you got to
1:37:36
really show me something to make me
1:37:38
willing to give that up. I would tell you that
1:37:41
one of our greatest achievements is faking the
1:37:43
moon landing. I
1:37:45
could be. I think it's an amazing
1:37:47
achievement. I think it's an amazing achievement.
1:37:50
It's akin to turning Kamala Harris into
1:37:52
the most compelling presidential candidate since Barack
1:37:54
Obama. There's things that they
1:37:56
can do with propaganda and spin that are
1:37:58
truly amazing. her become
1:38:00
this like celebrated character when just a few
1:38:02
months ago everybody was upset that she was
1:38:04
on the ticket and oh my god if
1:38:06
Joe Biden dies and she becomes president people
1:38:08
are freaking out now all of a sudden
1:38:10
everybody's like yes she should be president. That's
1:38:12
also wearing off though I mean that's... You
1:38:14
think so? I don't think so. She
1:38:17
doesn't have she had they were able to
1:38:19
make her into a sensation a political sensation
1:38:22
for about
1:38:24
a month I don't
1:38:26
think she has that anymore I don't think
1:38:28
people are because you got it you can hype
1:38:30
somebody up and you can turn them into the
1:38:33
next political savior through really good branding they
1:38:35
did that with Obama but you
1:38:38
got to have something that's be something they at least
1:38:40
have to have charisma I mean Obama had charisma so
1:38:43
you at least have to have that with a... If you
1:38:45
have a politician who has charisma then the media can come
1:38:47
in they can do the rest and they can turn you
1:38:49
into... Well she certainly has charisma when she has planned speeches
1:38:51
and she gets to read off a teleprompter and maybe that
1:38:54
thing in her ear what do you think about that? I
1:38:56
think that's legit. It could be.
1:38:58
You see the company has responded? To
1:39:02
the... Yeah. What did they say? They said
1:39:04
they they definitely didn't deny it and they
1:39:06
said it looks very close to like what
1:39:08
our device is and I go to their
1:39:11
website it might be on their website they
1:39:13
might have somebody sent me
1:39:15
something and I just
1:39:18
looked at it briefly I'm like oh this will probably come
1:39:20
up today I wanted I want to see it in real
1:39:22
time because whatever the website is
1:39:24
of the company that makes that thing
1:39:26
they've apparently addressed it on the website
1:39:32
but is that illegal? I
1:39:34
don't know if it's illegal but it's incredibly
1:39:37
unethical. Unethical for sure but also
1:39:39
if they pulled that off with
1:39:41
earrings like fucking amazing and
1:39:45
it would explain because she she stayed
1:39:47
on script really well amazingly well amazingly
1:39:49
well Does
1:39:53
it say anything about the presidential debates? The
1:39:57
companies definitely responded maybe it wasn't their website maybe
1:39:59
it was social... media. What is the name of the
1:40:01
company? Okay,
1:40:04
Google Nova audio earrings
1:40:07
response to presidential debate.
1:40:13
Nova audio earrings response to
1:40:15
presidential debates.
1:40:20
It might have been a troll. That's
1:40:22
why I wanted to see it in real time to find out what
1:40:24
the fuck it is. But see if there's a website where
1:40:27
they responded because I think they did
1:40:30
respond. I
1:40:32
could find it. I know I saved it. Company
1:40:37
says Kamal's earrings strikingly
1:40:39
similar to its Bluetooth device. Okay,
1:40:42
there it is. Strikingly similar
1:40:45
to its Bluetooth device
1:40:47
offers to make ones
1:40:50
for Trump. Imagine if
1:40:52
Trump starts wearing earrings. First
1:40:55
of all, that would never work because you can't tell him what to
1:40:57
do. Yeah, he would never. He's free balling. We
1:41:01
do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore
1:41:03
one of our products. The resemblance is
1:41:06
striking and while our product is not
1:41:08
specifically developed for the use at presidential
1:41:10
debates, it is nonetheless suited
1:41:12
for it. Okay,
1:41:15
there you go. To ensure a
1:41:17
level playing field for both candidates, we are currently
1:41:19
developing a male version and will soon be able
1:41:21
to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice
1:41:24
of color has been challenging though as orange
1:41:26
does not go well with a
1:41:28
lot of colors. That
1:41:34
company's funny. They're funny. That's
1:41:36
a funny company. I
1:41:38
would buy their shit. Bulletproof earrings for
1:41:40
Trump. Yeah, right? Yeah,
1:41:43
I mean, how crazy is the
1:41:45
conspiracy theory that he didn't actually get shot? That
1:41:48
he cut his ear like a pro wrestler.
1:41:51
Yeah, that's another or that it was shrapnel,
1:41:53
which to me would make even less sense
1:41:55
because yeah, it's a very minor injury because
1:41:57
she just got nicked. But
1:41:59
if it's. Shrapnel, you would expect, you know,
1:42:02
the marks all over his face. Right.
1:42:05
Or not. You know, the thing is
1:42:07
shrapnel could be a small piece of shrapnel. You
1:42:09
know, shrapnel's not uniform, right? So if it hits
1:42:11
a railing, which apparently there is some shot, there's
1:42:14
some video footage of, because I think
1:42:16
there was nine shots fired total. Yeah.
1:42:19
Was that what it was? Something like that.
1:42:21
Something crazy like that. What about that though?
1:42:23
Trump sustained two centimeter wide gunshot wound
1:42:25
to his ear. Okay. The
1:42:28
thing is, ears heal pretty quick. Yeah, and two centimeters.
1:42:30
I mean, you can't see it. Yeah. I
1:42:33
saw holes from when I got my ears pierced. Oh yeah, but
1:42:35
that's different. That's a hole. This
1:42:37
is a scratch. Like, ears, like, I've gotten my
1:42:39
ears fucked up a bunch of times from jujitsu,
1:42:41
and they heal pretty quick. It's
1:42:44
foreheads heal quick, ears heal quick. Things
1:42:47
around your mouth heal really quick. There's
1:42:49
parts of your body that have a lot of
1:42:51
blood vessels, and they heal pretty quick. He's old,
1:42:53
which is odd for him not to have a
1:42:56
scar, but it's not inconceivable that it could just
1:42:59
scratch the surface, and that would cause a lot of
1:43:01
blood. Like if you get a forehead cut, forehead
1:43:04
cuts are crazy. You just pours blood on your
1:43:06
face. But if you get a cut like on your
1:43:08
knee, it doesn't even drip. You
1:43:11
have to have a real cut on your knee to
1:43:14
be dribbling blood down your shin. The
1:43:16
forehead is filled with blood vessels,
1:43:18
as I think are the tips of the ears.
1:43:21
So I think it would bleed a lot, and
1:43:23
it might be a minor injury that bleeds a
1:43:25
lot, and it could heal in
1:43:27
a few days. Also it wouldn't even ... Even if
1:43:29
he didn't get hit with a bullet, which he did, but if
1:43:32
he didn't, it doesn't make a difference.
1:43:34
He still got shot at. It doesn't
1:43:36
change what happened. People behind him, one
1:43:38
guy died, and other people got grievously
1:43:41
injured, terribly injured to the
1:43:43
point where it's going to affect them for the rest of their life. The
1:43:46
more bizarre thing about the shooting is that
1:43:48
it's only been two months since it happened,
1:43:51
right? Two months. Not
1:43:54
even two months. It's been like a month and
1:43:56
a half, and we've
1:43:58
moved on like it never happened. It never
1:44:00
happened in two weeks. In two weeks they
1:44:03
stopped talking about it. It's had no political
1:44:05
impact whatsoever. Nuts. He
1:44:08
got no polling boost from it. Reagan
1:44:10
got like 12 points briefly. Which just shows you the
1:44:12
polls are full of shit. Probably.
1:44:16
Yeah, full of shit. I mean they are
1:44:18
full of shit, but also it would not
1:44:20
shock me if, because we're so easily distracted,
1:44:23
if people really did just forget and don't care a week later,
1:44:25
two weeks later. Well, as long as it's not
1:44:27
in the news and it's not in the news. You
1:44:30
don't care about it. Also, there was
1:44:32
no press conference. So that's
1:44:34
kind of crazy. There was no disclosure
1:44:36
of all the information about this young
1:44:39
man's prior history, what led him to
1:44:41
this. They
1:44:43
went to his apartment and it was
1:44:45
professionally scrubbed. There was no silverware in
1:44:47
his place. There's also
1:44:49
this bizarre thing where there's a, you
1:44:52
know how they get ad data where you could track
1:44:54
where phones have been? Just one
1:44:56
phone was going from outside of the
1:44:58
FBI office in Washington, DC to
1:45:01
where this kid is multiple times.
1:45:05
So how did this kid get these explosive devices?
1:45:07
How did he get up on the roof? How
1:45:11
did they not flag him? And you see a
1:45:13
guy walking around with a rangefinder a half
1:45:15
an hour before the event. That guy is
1:45:18
going to jail. Like what are you talking
1:45:20
about? There's two reasons for a rangefinder. You're
1:45:22
trying to shoot something or you're using it
1:45:24
for golf. If you're not playing
1:45:26
golf, then you're trying to shoot something. That's the
1:45:28
only other reason for a rangefinder. Yeah. And
1:45:31
that was like three hours before. Yeah. They knew
1:45:33
about that kid. They were
1:45:35
aware that he was there. He somehow or another
1:45:37
got on the roof with a rifle. The whole
1:45:39
thing sucks. It stinks to high
1:45:41
heaven. And then they cremate him. He's
1:45:44
gone. They get his body. Someone
1:45:46
snatches his body like five or
1:45:48
six days after the event. And 10 days
1:45:51
later, he's cremated. The whole
1:45:53
thing is nuts. Like who is this kid? How
1:45:55
did he do this? Why did some 20-year-old kid
1:45:57
take shots at the president? Why didn't
1:45:59
he have a scope? This is one where
1:46:01
I'm totally open to conspiracy theories only because there's
1:46:03
not even there's not even like an official narrative
1:46:05
for it They've basically told
1:46:07
us nothing. So we're left
1:46:09
to fill in the blanks Not only that think about how
1:46:12
perfect it would have been for a
1:46:14
plan to assassinate someone if you
1:46:16
do get this lone crazy kid
1:46:19
You give them whatever. I mean, there's been no
1:46:21
toxicology examination of his body that's been released, right?
1:46:23
So who knows what the fuck this kid's on
1:46:25
if you're gonna try to convince someone to go
1:46:28
shoot the former president You'd probably dope him up
1:46:30
with some crazy shit, right? And then that would
1:46:32
be in his system and then would be like
1:46:34
be able to trace. Okay, how
1:46:36
do you get this? Let's and let's talk to all
1:46:38
the people that are on his cell phone all the
1:46:40
people that are in his email Let's investigate and find
1:46:42
out where the fuck you got this stuff that he's
1:46:44
on when he shoots at the president You don't hear
1:46:46
a peep out of that so this
1:46:49
guy somehow or another figures out how
1:46:51
to get on the roof take these
1:46:53
shots and Then they
1:46:55
kill him now if he shot and
1:46:57
hit Trump if Trump didn't turn his
1:46:59
head of that pivotal moment What they're
1:47:01
talking about and it's a headshot Trump
1:47:03
is dead the world's in chaos and
1:47:05
this kid's dead Seconds later
1:47:07
and then it's like that crazy
1:47:10
kid who shoots the president and that's
1:47:12
it and then Okay.
1:47:15
Now who's gonna run as a Republican
1:47:17
who's in the world's in chaos? Yeah,
1:47:20
it would have been a perfect plan If
1:47:22
that kid just pulled it off Yeah,
1:47:26
I mean and I just I
1:47:28
can't I Think about I
1:47:31
when I do a like a college speech. We'll have a
1:47:33
little we'll have a few security guys there and
1:47:37
There's no way if someone showed up with a rangefinder
1:47:41
They would not get in the building Anyone that
1:47:43
looks vaguely suspicious with any kind of bag is getting
1:47:45
flagged and I got like, you know Three or four
1:47:47
guys and I'm just a guy. I'm
1:47:49
like just a guy giving a speech at a college That
1:47:52
never would have happened. It could not have happened. They
1:47:54
would have flagged especially three hours ahead of time So
1:47:57
how does that happen with the president u-nighters or former
1:47:59
president? kind
1:52:00
of story from their perspective, because
1:52:02
they look at him as a monster, this
1:52:04
monstrous figure, and the
1:52:07
media deliberately created this. They gave him all
1:52:09
the attention, they sucked all the oxygen out
1:52:11
of the room for every other
1:52:13
candidate, because this is the guy they
1:52:15
wanted, and they thought we were
1:52:17
gonna annihilate him, there's no way he's gonna win a general
1:52:19
election, and of course he won, but, and
1:52:22
I think that's one of the reasons why ever
1:52:24
since then, they haven't been able, the media, they
1:52:26
just can't, they hate him
1:52:28
with an extra passion, that they have
1:52:30
not had even for other Republican presidents, and I
1:52:33
think a lot of it is, it's
1:52:35
like this, they're projecting, because
1:52:38
they realize that they did this, and
1:52:41
they just can't get over it, I think. Well
1:52:43
there's definitely this over correction. Robert
1:52:46
Epstein talked about that, Robert
1:52:48
Epstein's done all that work on Google, and
1:52:51
these ephemeral instances
1:52:54
of interacting with Google, where it shows
1:52:56
you with search results, and with news
1:52:58
stories that get brought to your feed,
1:53:00
they're temporary, you don't record them, so
1:53:02
he records all these, and
1:53:05
what he has found through his
1:53:07
research is that, especially with people that are
1:53:09
on the fence, like people that are 50-50, you
1:53:12
can swing 50-50 to 90-10, like
1:53:16
people that don't know who they're gonna vote for, you
1:53:18
can make it 90-10, just
1:53:20
through these interactions with Google.
1:53:23
It's really shocking. What do you mean 90-10 in
1:53:25
what way? 90-10, like say if you want
1:53:28
Hillary to win, or you want Trump to win, whatever
1:53:31
candidate you choose, if you manipulate the
1:53:33
search results, if you manipulate just the
1:53:35
fill-in, the suggestions is
1:53:38
Matt Walsh A, and then it just fills it
1:53:40
in. Just through that,
1:53:43
just through the suggestions, they can manipulate
1:53:45
it to a significant difference for people
1:53:47
that are on the fence, that are
1:53:49
independents, or that are undecided. And
1:53:51
he said you can take 50-50 and turn it to 90-10, which
1:53:54
is fucking stunning. Terrifying.
1:53:58
It's terrifying, it's unregulated. And one
1:54:00
of the things that happened was after Trump won in 2016,
1:54:03
there was some sort of a
1:54:06
meeting at Google where they were openly talking about
1:54:08
this. And they were
1:54:10
talking about, we can't let this happen again,
1:54:12
which is such a crazy thing to say,
1:54:14
that we can't let the people decide who
1:54:16
they want to be president again.
1:54:19
If that is what they said, if that is
1:54:21
what they... And let's find out what the actual
1:54:24
quote was. I could see
1:54:26
how someone would say that if they
1:54:28
worked at an insurance company and they're
1:54:31
a pro die-hard Democrat, blue no matter who,
1:54:33
and they were like, we can't let this
1:54:35
happen again. I could see how
1:54:37
you say that if you're just an individual voter who doesn't
1:54:39
really have an impact. But if you're
1:54:41
someone who can shift undecided voters from 50-50
1:54:44
to 90-10, as Robert Epstein is
1:54:47
alleging, if that's true, that's
1:54:50
a crazy thing to say. Because you're
1:54:52
deciding, you're going to decide the result
1:54:54
of the election. And you don't give
1:54:56
a fuck about debate and free speech
1:54:58
and people being able to decide for
1:55:00
themselves because you think that you're right.
1:55:03
And you think everybody else should agree
1:55:05
with you. You also think that you
1:55:08
are... You've told yourself that you are
1:55:10
the vanguard protecting democracy in
1:55:12
our way of life. Which is crazy. Which is
1:55:14
insane. Of course, the idea that you have to
1:55:16
prevent people from voting for a certain guy in
1:55:18
order to protect democracy is
1:55:21
nuts. It's so nuts.
1:55:25
But that's what they actually believe. And
1:55:27
when you tell yourself that, you convince yourself that, well,
1:55:30
this is for their own good. These
1:55:32
people are silly. They don't know. They're
1:55:34
dumb. They're bigoted. They don't understand what
1:55:36
they're doing. And so for their own good, we have to prevent them.
1:55:38
We have to do whatever we can to prevent this. When I talk
1:55:40
to some of my hardcore lefty friends that
1:55:43
are still left in LA that I was telling
1:55:45
you about before, they say we. They say we
1:55:47
all the time. We have to win this.
1:55:49
They say that all the time. We can win if this happens. They
1:55:52
say that kind of shit. And they talk
1:55:54
about it like they're talking about the Dodgers. They
1:55:56
really do. They talk about it like they're talking
1:55:58
about our team. And they're connected
1:56:00
to all these other people in their
1:56:02
community and they're all on this team
1:56:04
and it's weird, man. It's a weird
1:56:06
little hack that it's just like hypnosis.
1:56:09
It's weird that you can just do
1:56:11
that to people. It's weird that you
1:56:13
can get people to just ideologically be
1:56:15
captured and join this team and lose
1:56:17
all ability to look at things objectively
1:56:19
and then just understand nuance and understand
1:56:21
the influence of propaganda and like, how
1:56:23
many people are spending money on this?
1:56:25
And like, why is all the news
1:56:27
have this one specific narrative and then
1:56:29
Fox News is a totally different, what is going
1:56:32
on here? And nobody does that. And
1:56:34
not only can you get them
1:56:36
to, obviously they hate Trump, but to also demonize
1:56:40
half of
1:56:43
the country's population. I mean, there was just, I
1:56:46
think it was MSNBC yesterday,
1:56:49
one of these pundits was
1:56:51
talking about Trump and said, well, he's despicable,
1:56:53
he's terrible, but his supporters are too,
1:56:56
he said. And they went
1:56:59
on about how terrible his supporters are,
1:57:01
which is you're talking about tens of millions of Americans.
1:57:03
The basket of deplorables. Right. But
1:57:06
we take it for granted now, but 15
1:57:08
years ago, that would kind of be unthinkable. You
1:57:11
wouldn't do that. You say whatever you
1:57:13
want about a politician, you hate them, they're terrible, but it
1:57:15
was just generally understood that you don't use that
1:57:17
language to talk about all the people voting for
1:57:20
them. These are American citizens. I remember when Mitt
1:57:22
Romney and Barack Obama debated, it was
1:57:25
the most cordial, professional,
1:57:28
respectful discussion of the issues and who could
1:57:31
do a better job. Kind of
1:57:33
amazing. Kind of amazing that
1:57:35
that was, what was that, 2012? Kind
1:57:38
of amazing. And I
1:57:40
don't mind, because you can go back farther
1:57:43
in American history and you can find, like
1:57:45
back to the beginning and they're in Congress, like beating each
1:57:47
other over the head with fireplace pokers
1:57:49
and that sort of thing. There's
1:57:53
an argument to be made for that kind of, it certainly
1:57:55
makes C-SPAN a lot more interesting, but
1:57:58
that shows a certain passion. for the
1:58:00
issues, I suppose. Sure. But
1:58:03
that's, it's, what we have now is different from
1:58:05
that. It's much more, I mean, there've
1:58:09
been multiple cases recently of
1:58:11
congressional hearings where
1:58:13
they start screaming at each other. Marjorie Taylor
1:58:15
Greene, AOC. Marjorie Taylor Greene and AOC, and
1:58:17
who's the other one? Jasmine Crockett, I think.
1:58:21
And it's like a waffle house. It's like, you know.
1:58:24
Just no respect for each other, but also
1:58:26
no dignity at all, no class.
1:58:29
No respect for the position. Right. Like
1:58:31
you can't be yelling out, oh baby girl.
1:58:33
Like, you're a congresswoman. This is crazy. And
1:58:36
they're making fun of each other's wigs. Google
1:58:38
versus Trump leaked video reveals executives' negative
1:58:41
reactions to Trump's 2016 election victory. So
1:58:43
what is the actual quote? I didn't
1:58:45
see the actual quote that we were
1:58:47
trying to find. There were, stuff
1:58:49
said that they weren't happy. And then
1:58:51
this got, so this was a confidential
1:58:53
video that got released via Breitbart in
1:58:55
2016. So he's saying here, hold
1:58:58
on. He's saying here, most people
1:59:00
are pretty upset and sad because of the election. Imagine
1:59:03
that, most people. Like, how do you know? Myself
1:59:07
as an immigrant and a refugee, I certainly
1:59:09
find this election deeply offensive. And
1:59:11
I know many of you do too. I think
1:59:13
it's a very stressful time and it conflicts with
1:59:16
many of our values. So scroll up, what
1:59:18
else does he say? He
1:59:20
also, he then added too, like he hopes that
1:59:23
there might be, I don't know where to find where it was. This might
1:59:25
have been right here. Yeah, less convinced. He
1:59:27
said, I find many things Trump has done very
1:59:30
offensive. I don't have very
1:59:32
high hopes, but he could do anything. You have
1:59:34
no idea. Maybe he will do something great. Who
1:59:36
knows? Take a little bit of wishful thinking. So
1:59:38
Google pushed back that there wasn't any bias discussed
1:59:40
in the meeting. Well, that's
1:59:42
bias right there, saying that most of us are
1:59:44
upset, right? For over 20 years, everyone
1:59:47
at Google has been able to freely express their opinions
1:59:49
at these meetings. Nothing was said at that meeting or
1:59:51
any other meeting to suggest that
1:59:53
any political biases ever
1:59:55
influences the way we build or
1:59:58
operate our products. So this is
2:00:00
Google. official statement. So what else did
2:00:02
he say though? Because the thing that Robert was
2:00:04
alleging that he was saying we're gonna make sure it doesn't
2:00:06
happen again. I couldn't find that quote. I watched a little
2:00:08
bit of the video with closed caption. Scroll back up so
2:00:10
I could just read all those quotes. Someone
2:00:15
else that they're giving a quote of, not him.
2:00:18
Mm-hmm. I think a lot
2:00:20
of us agree this election is particularly hard. He said there was a
2:00:22
lot of rhetoric. There
2:00:26
was a lot of rhetoric. Yeah. Well,
2:00:28
that's what elections are.
2:00:30
One of the
2:00:34
things that's always interesting to me is that they're
2:00:36
that they are so desperate to stop Trump and
2:00:38
they they act
2:00:40
like it's it's you know the future
2:00:42
of the planet hangs in the balance. Meanwhile they
2:00:46
still own everything. I mean they
2:00:49
own all the institutions. Google you
2:00:51
know the federal government. So
2:00:54
the truth is that Trump could get into
2:00:56
office. This happened last time.
2:00:58
He was in office for four years. They act like it's into
2:01:00
the world. Then he's out of
2:01:02
office and they basically reverse everything he did
2:01:04
in like two seconds. A
2:01:06
couple executive orders whatever and and most
2:01:08
of it never took hold anyway because
2:01:10
the bureaucracy is entirely aligned against Trump.
2:01:13
So it's that's the problem is
2:01:16
that even when Trump gets in
2:01:18
there there's there's he's handicapped in
2:01:20
his ability to do anything because
2:01:22
the entire federal government he
2:01:25
might be at the top of it but everybody underneath
2:01:27
him despises
2:01:29
him and they're all leftist. So and
2:01:33
they could just reverse it the second that he
2:01:35
leaves and yet they still act like if he's
2:01:37
in there that it's it's the end of the
2:01:39
world. They still can't. You think they'd almost have
2:01:41
an attitude. They're like yeah whatever fine. Let them
2:01:43
have it for four years. Yeah it still won't
2:01:45
matter because we're still gonna be in charge of
2:01:47
everything. Did you see
2:01:49
the conversation where this woman was talking
2:01:51
to someone from the Trump from
2:01:54
from Trump's team saying
2:01:56
worried that he was going
2:01:58
to weaponize the judicial system
2:02:01
once he got into office, that if he
2:02:03
got into office, he would weaponize the judicial
2:02:06
system and go after his enemies. Oh,
2:02:08
wow. And he says, like, what- I can't imagine. What
2:02:11
are you saying? For you saying that and
2:02:13
asking whether or not Trump would do that,
2:02:15
you have to acknowledge the
2:02:18
fact that that's absolutely happening to him
2:02:20
right now. And then she
2:02:23
tries to push back against it, and he does
2:02:25
a brilliant job of explaining how she's incorrect. Hey,
2:02:27
let me- I'm going to find this, Jamie, because
2:02:29
this is a good one. Unless
2:02:32
you could find it. But it's kind of
2:02:34
crazy, like, to see this conversation take place,
2:02:36
because you're just like, what? Like,
2:02:38
how are you even- how are you
2:02:40
so blind to what's absolutely happening that
2:02:42
you could even say that? I'm
2:02:46
going to find it. God damn it. It's
2:02:49
so hard to find things that you save on
2:02:51
these little social media platforms. See
2:02:54
if you can find it, Jamie. We're from
2:02:56
the debate. No, it was from a conversation
2:02:58
between someone in the Trump administration, someone on
2:03:00
his team, and I
2:03:04
know I could find it if you just give me a second. That
2:03:06
Trump is going to weaponize the- Yeah, that's
2:03:08
her argument, is that Trump is going to
2:03:10
weaponize the political system.
2:03:12
And, you know, it's guys saying, how
2:03:14
are you even saying that without admitting
2:03:16
that he- that they're doing that
2:03:19
right now to him? God
2:03:21
damn it, I'm not going to find it. I don't know where I
2:03:24
saved it. Sorry.
2:03:27
Every time I type it in, all I see is stuff about Trump saying
2:03:29
he would use- I
2:03:31
know, but that's because of Google, and that's why What's
2:03:34
His Face is correct. God,
2:03:37
I know I saved it. Shit. Of course, the
2:03:39
funny thing is that he definitely will not do
2:03:42
that. No, well, he didn't do that when he
2:03:44
was in office. He could have done that to
2:03:46
Hillary. Right. He said he thought it
2:03:48
would be a bad look. Yeah, yeah, he ran
2:03:50
on lock-up, he didn't. I mean, that's the thing.
2:03:52
They always- their criticisms of Trump, one of the
2:03:54
reasons they don't really do that, don't really land,
2:03:56
is that they're not
2:03:59
hitting him. in the places where, like they
2:04:01
don't even understand what his weaknesses actually are. They
2:04:04
try to make him out to be some kind of
2:04:06
dictator. That's the opposite. If anything, he has the opposite,
2:04:09
if anything, he has the
2:04:12
opposite flaw, that he's actually
2:04:14
hesitant to wield power even in times when
2:04:16
he should. So,
2:04:20
you know, if anything, that should be the criticism, that
2:04:22
you should use your power more, but he's
2:04:25
probably the least dictatorial, you
2:04:28
know, presidential candidate we've ever had. Yeah,
2:04:32
probably, when you think about what he actually did when
2:04:34
he was in office. But
2:04:36
that's why it gets weird. It's like, because they
2:04:38
can say something and it can
2:04:40
be not true, but yet enough people repeat
2:04:42
it and then it just becomes a narrative
2:04:45
that everyone just, I mean,
2:04:47
like, it's true that he's
2:04:49
a convicted felon now, but is it true that
2:04:51
it makes any sense? No, for you to say
2:04:53
that he's a convicted felon, like, okay, right, but
2:04:55
what did he do? Do you know what he
2:04:57
did? What he did is a misdemeanor. And
2:04:59
it also, it had lapsed the,
2:05:04
whatever the fuck it is, where you... Statue
2:05:07
of limitations, thank you. And
2:05:10
there's 34 counts for a bookkeeping. Right,
2:05:13
but they don't know what he did. The people
2:05:16
saying that, they don't know what he did. They don't
2:05:18
care. Right, they don't care. So they just repeat that
2:05:20
thing that he's a convicted felon. I
2:05:23
can't find this goddamn thing, it's driving me nuts. Because
2:05:26
it was really interesting. I hate when I save something and I
2:05:28
don't know where I put it, but I know I do. And
2:05:31
the funny thing is, these are also
2:05:33
people who otherwise would say that the
2:05:35
court system is entirely corrupt, that
2:05:38
just because you're a convicted felon, it really doesn't
2:05:40
mean anything at all, necessarily. Right. But
2:05:44
in this case, they put a lot of stock in it. Well,
2:05:47
it's just, we're in the
2:05:49
weirdest time where people are willing to believe
2:05:51
bullshit. It's not as simple as being able
2:05:53
to recognize bullshit. They recognize it, they have
2:05:56
it right in front of them, and they're
2:05:58
willing to believe it because it's- more
2:06:00
convenient to believe it. Yep. All
2:06:04
right, I can't find it. I'm giving up right
2:06:06
now. Damn
2:06:10
it. Well
2:06:12
they said stuff like that for sure. Yeah, I
2:06:15
know they have, but this one was really interesting
2:06:17
because you see this guy combat it and
2:06:19
the way he combats it is so interesting to
2:06:22
see her squirm because yeah, that's
2:06:24
exactly what they're doing. I mean it's not a
2:06:26
terrible crime that he committed and you're making it
2:06:28
seem as if it's something
2:06:30
that he deserves to be in jail for the
2:06:32
rest of his life for and that's crazy. That's
2:06:34
a crazy thing to say and that might actually
2:06:36
happen if he doesn't become president. If he doesn't
2:06:38
become president, they might actually lock him up for
2:06:41
25 years for that, which is
2:06:43
essentially the rest of his life will be
2:06:45
behind bars at Rikers. Yeah,
2:06:47
I kind of go back. That's the conventional
2:06:49
wisdom, at least the people I talk
2:06:51
to that they say, well, if Trump doesn't win, he's going
2:06:53
to jail and so he's got a lot on the line
2:06:55
here. I
2:06:58
kind of think, are they really like, maybe
2:07:01
it's naive of me to think, but would they do
2:07:04
that or would they rather just, he
2:07:07
loses, Kamala wins
2:07:09
and then they can let, they'd want
2:07:12
Trump to just fade into obscurity and never talk about him
2:07:14
again. I don't know. I
2:07:18
would tend to think that that would be that they'd prefer that, but
2:07:21
probably not. Yeah, you don't know.
2:07:25
It's so hard to tell what people would
2:07:27
or wouldn't do today. It's
2:07:29
just the whole country seems so
2:07:31
committed to their side and
2:07:34
I don't know what a solution to that is and
2:07:37
I don't know how we get past
2:07:39
this and whether
2:07:41
Trump wins or loses. What happens?
2:07:43
What happens next? There's certainly a real
2:07:46
thirst for vengeance. They
2:07:48
want revenge on him. I think that's what
2:07:50
it comes down to. Whether
2:07:53
it helps them politically or not because I think that's the problem
2:07:55
is that if they, if
2:07:57
Kamala wins and then they really go after Trump and try to... put
2:08:00
him in jail and if they actually do put him in jail, I
2:08:02
don't see how it helps them politically. I think
2:08:04
that's just going to radicalize people on the right even more than
2:08:06
they already are. It will radicalize people on the
2:08:08
right, but people on the right. For good reason, by the way.
2:08:11
I'm radicalized. It doesn't
2:08:15
help them politically, but I think they just, he
2:08:17
has to pay the price for defying them for
2:08:20
so many years. But if he
2:08:22
does get in office, then it gets very
2:08:24
interesting. Because then it's like, what
2:08:27
can he do now? How much different is his take on
2:08:29
it now? Because one of the things that he said is
2:08:31
the first time he got in, he didn't know anything
2:08:33
about governing. He's like, I had to find people and I
2:08:35
picked some of the wrong people, but
2:08:37
I know better now and I
2:08:39
could do a better job of it now, which
2:08:41
kind of makes sense. Because if I wanted to
2:08:43
talk to him, one of the things I really
2:08:45
want to ask is what is it like? When
2:08:47
you actually get in there, they don't think you're
2:08:50
going to be in there, and now all of
2:08:52
a sudden you're the actual president. What is the
2:08:54
resistance like? What are the communications like? What can
2:08:56
you say about how you have
2:08:58
these conversations with these people and how
2:09:00
you govern? How you
2:09:02
get things done? Yeah. How much power do
2:09:05
you actually have? What is it actually like? Because we
2:09:07
all have this sort of mystical view
2:09:09
of what it's like to be the actual president, but
2:09:12
very few people and only one ever that's
2:09:14
not a part of the system has ever
2:09:16
snuck through and attained that
2:09:18
position. It's only him. Yeah, I'd
2:09:20
be interested to hear his answer to that. It
2:09:22
wouldn't surprise me if in a weird way when
2:09:25
you become president, you
2:09:28
feel very powerless once you're sitting
2:09:30
there because you realize that you're
2:09:32
overseeing this just gigantic mammoth
2:09:36
thing that's just
2:09:39
so unwieldy. There's
2:09:42
no way to really control it. Yeah.
2:09:46
And especially in his case, you've got so
2:09:48
many people within his own administration plotting against
2:09:50
him. Is there a
2:09:52
lot of people within his own administration now you think plotting
2:09:54
against him or only then? Do you
2:09:56
think it's just like backstabby politics that just
2:09:58
what they do period? I
2:10:00
mean at the time there certainly was and I think but I
2:10:02
think he also made some he made some Bad
2:10:05
choices and personnel he made a lot of really bad.
2:10:07
I mean bringing guys like John Bolton in There's
2:10:12
no chance that you're not going to be undermined by somebody like that
2:10:16
Then especially you know in Trump's first
2:10:18
campaign in 2016 Drain
2:10:21
the swamp was was one of the was build the
2:10:23
wall and drain the swamp and lock her up you
2:10:25
know the two three big things and And
2:10:29
You don't we don't hear drain the swamp nearly as much anymore.
2:10:31
In fact. I don't think I've heard it It's
2:10:33
never said anymore, right? Which is
2:10:36
unfortunate because that is actually that is that is the first
2:10:38
thing that needs to happen if he gets in there And
2:10:40
what I would love to see is that Okay,
2:10:43
he's in there now. He got back in they tried to
2:10:45
stop and they tried to kill him They tried to put him in jail. He still
2:10:47
got in there He doesn't he's not
2:10:49
getting reelected. This is it for him four
2:10:52
more years. He's out of politics forever after
2:10:54
that And
2:10:56
I'd love to see him just I Got
2:10:59
nothing to lose now. They're gonna put me in jail when I'm
2:11:01
out of office You know so I got nothing to lose. I
2:11:03
don't care what these people say and Just
2:11:05
ruthlessly push your agenda through no matter how much
2:11:07
they complain about I'd love to see him do
2:11:10
that I think that they're assuming
2:11:12
he will which is why they're so desperate to stop him But
2:11:17
but I don't know they didn't happen the first time you know
2:11:19
so I Hope
2:11:21
it does. What's also Gonna
2:11:24
be very interesting to see what what
2:11:27
do they do to try to prevent this
2:11:29
from happening in the future? Because one of
2:11:31
the things that has been discussed is cracking
2:11:33
down on misinformation and that free
2:11:35
speech doesn't include misinformation Which
2:11:38
is a wild thing to say after what we
2:11:40
just went through with kovat where what people were
2:11:42
saying was misinformation Turned out to be a hundred
2:11:44
percent true and not just about kovat, but about a
2:11:46
bunch of things hunter Biden laptop story There's quite a
2:11:49
few different things you could point to like
2:11:51
who the fuck gets to decide what's information Only
2:11:55
the government you guys the people that
2:11:57
have lied about basically everything like
2:11:59
this This is a crazy thing to say and to
2:12:02
be running on that and to get people to
2:12:04
support that. The lack
2:12:06
of understanding of what it means to
2:12:08
be able to freely express ideas and
2:12:10
communicate and whistleblowers, whistleblowers from corporations that
2:12:12
are telling you about something they're doing
2:12:14
that's illegal, whistleblowers from government agents that
2:12:16
are telling you they're spying on you
2:12:18
when it's illegal, all that shit. To
2:12:21
have that big filter
2:12:24
through the government is an insane position
2:12:27
and yet that's something that they talk about and this is
2:12:29
something bizarrely that the
2:12:31
left supports. Well
2:12:33
even if, because even if it is mis, most
2:12:35
of the stuff they call misinformation isn't but in
2:12:38
the case when there's something that is mis, it's
2:12:40
just not true, plenty of that goes around
2:12:42
the internet. That's still free speech too. You
2:12:44
have the right to say things that are not, as long
2:12:46
as you're not slandering somebody, you
2:12:48
have the right to make claims about the world that don't
2:12:50
happen to be true. So
2:12:53
the idea that that doesn't qualify as free speech
2:12:55
is of course absurd and then,
2:12:57
but then who, then that also
2:12:59
requires some central authority to be
2:13:01
the arbiter of what is true and what is not.
2:13:03
Exactly. And it's like a
2:13:06
childish view of truth and lies.
2:13:08
It's childish because one of the only ways that people
2:13:10
find out if something is correct or not is let
2:13:13
someone say something that's incorrect and then someone who knows
2:13:15
a lot more comes along and corrects them. Right.
2:13:17
Yeah, that's, that's how it works. You know,
2:13:20
like I had Terrence Howard, you know
2:13:22
Terrence Howard? The actor, brilliant guy, but
2:13:25
wrong about a lot of the things that he thinks he's right about.
2:13:28
I brought him in with Eric Weinstein and
2:13:30
Eric Weinstein, who's a genius,
2:13:32
like a legitimate genius and a
2:13:34
mathematician explained him like very patiently
2:13:37
and carefully, this is why you're wrong and
2:13:39
this is what you need to know. And
2:13:41
you've got some good ideas, but you're off
2:13:43
on all these different things. I'm an actual
2:13:46
expert and let me help you
2:13:48
out here. And so anybody who saw Terrence Howard
2:13:50
talk on the first podcast had this idea. Like,
2:13:53
oh wow, maybe he's right about all these things. Anybody
2:13:55
who saw the second podcast with
2:13:57
Eric where Eric clearly corrects him.
2:14:00
and actually knows what he's talking about. He's
2:14:02
a brilliant guy. Now
2:14:04
you have a, that's what free speech is supposed
2:14:06
to be about. That's what it's supposed to be
2:14:08
about. An actual expert comes in, corrects everything, and
2:14:10
then you have this look at it, like, okay,
2:14:12
now I see. Now it's been, but it's not
2:14:14
silence Terrence Howard because he doesn't know what the
2:14:16
fuck he's saying. No, it's like let him talk.
2:14:19
Now let someone who really knows what they're talking
2:14:21
about explain to him why he's wrong. That's
2:14:23
the benefit of free speech, and everybody
2:14:25
listens to that, has a better understanding
2:14:27
of all these different really weird, complex
2:14:29
things that they're discussing that maybe otherwise
2:14:31
you would never have illuminated in
2:14:34
that way. You'd never really be able to understand it.
2:14:37
That's why I think the free speech thing is, people
2:14:39
act like it's a complicated, it's
2:14:42
a complicated subject. Where do you draw the line?
2:14:44
What is free speech? What
2:14:47
qualifies and what doesn't? I don't think it is that
2:14:49
complicated really. I think it's just, you
2:14:52
should have the right to express
2:14:54
whatever your opinion happens to be. Everyone
2:14:56
should be able to say their opinion, their
2:14:58
point of view. Wrong
2:15:01
or right, reprehensible or not.
2:15:04
They should be able to say it. Yeah, you
2:15:06
can't defame someone. You can't threaten to
2:15:08
kill somebody, but those aren't really opinions.
2:15:11
That's different. If it's just your opinion about what's happening
2:15:13
in the world, it should
2:15:15
be allowed. And it should be allowed legally, it
2:15:17
should be allowed on every social media platform. I
2:15:20
think it's kind of simple actually to
2:15:23
differentiate between that and the, because yeah, there's certain
2:15:25
kinds of speech that should not be allowed. We
2:15:27
all understand that. Yeah, it's complicated and this childish
2:15:29
idea that just handed over to the government to
2:15:31
clean it up, that's not the answer. It
2:15:34
is complicated. There are gonna be people that say a
2:15:36
bunch of things that aren't true. But
2:15:38
the way to combat that is not put the
2:15:40
government in charge of what's true. Especially
2:15:43
when they've been wrong so many times. Or
2:15:45
they just out and out lied so many times. That's a
2:15:47
crazy position for the left to take. The ones who are
2:15:50
supposed to be the party of science and reason, the
2:15:52
ones who are supposed to be the most educated.
2:15:54
It's just a bizarre perspective, just because you don't
2:15:56
want Trump to win. Just you
2:15:58
don't want this to happen again. And they
2:16:00
hate speech too is the other label they use to... You
2:16:07
can't say, Tim Wall said this recently about
2:16:10
free speech. He said, well, of course you can't. Hate
2:16:13
speech and misinformation doesn't count. Well,
2:16:15
what is hate speech? Hate speech is just, you're
2:16:18
expressing that you hate something. People
2:16:21
hate things. It's
2:16:23
legitimate. There are some things we should hate. So
2:16:27
the idea that it's automatically illegitimate
2:16:29
to express a view if it's
2:16:31
communicating hatred is of course ridiculous.
2:16:33
It is ridiculous, but it's also
2:16:35
a really goofy label that you
2:16:38
can slap on basically anything. Like
2:16:40
hate speech can get to the point where if
2:16:42
you call Caitlyn Jenner, Bruce Jenner, that's hate speech,
2:16:45
right? That's dead naming. Dead naming falls
2:16:47
under hate speech. And so
2:16:49
what are you saying? You can't do that?
2:16:51
Like, well, that's fucking ridiculous. I can call
2:16:53
him a cunt, but I can't say his
2:16:55
name is Bruce. That's insanity. Like
2:16:58
what world are we living in where you
2:17:00
can decide what someone can and can't say
2:17:02
by a label? That's so why, it's such
2:17:04
a net you're casting. You
2:17:07
know, hate speech, it's
2:17:09
like completely subjective. Anyone can decide what's
2:17:11
hate speech. Right. And
2:17:15
it implies that all hatred is automatically bad, or at
2:17:17
least it puts the people in power and position where
2:17:19
they can decide what kind of things you're allowed to
2:17:21
hate and what you're not. Right, and
2:17:23
it makes things all equal too. Something
2:17:26
like very benign versus something truly awful.
2:17:29
It's all under this one stupid umbrella of hate
2:17:31
speech. Yeah, hate
2:17:33
crimes too, the same thing. Where do you think we would
2:17:35
be if Elon hadn't bought Twitter? Different
2:17:39
world, right? Yeah, that's, I
2:17:42
think Elon Musk is,
2:17:46
he is actually preserving free speech. One
2:17:49
of the main people preserving free speech in America right now. And
2:17:53
going into space. So it's always funny to me
2:17:55
when people, when the
2:17:57
left tries to nitpick and needle at them, it's like this is
2:17:59
the best. is one of the most significant human beings on the
2:18:01
planet right now. And literally one of
2:18:03
the most significant human beings historically ever. Right.
2:18:06
He's like a Nikola Tesla type character that people are
2:18:08
gonna be talking about 100 years from now. And
2:18:11
he'll, you know, SpaceX will launch a rocket and it'll
2:18:13
blow up or something. Stephen
2:18:15
King was making fun of him. Right, yeah, someone
2:18:17
like Stephen King, like, rocket blew up.
2:18:19
It's like, dude, your rockets
2:18:22
don't blow up because you don't build them.
2:18:24
I mean, you know. Not only that, like
2:18:26
he made this tweet about how it damaged
2:18:28
the ionosphere that when it
2:18:30
blew up. But do you know that that
2:18:32
like heals up in like 40 minutes? Yeah.
2:18:35
He didn't even bother looking into that. Like
2:18:37
every time they punch a rocket through that
2:18:39
shit, it damages it. But it heals. It's
2:18:42
like you punch a hole through a cloud. And
2:18:45
a lot of times when they say that the rocket malfunction or something
2:18:47
is actually doing exactly what it was supposed to do, this is a
2:18:49
test run or whatever. But it's-
2:18:51
Yeah, they have to test tolerances and parameters. I
2:18:54
mean, they have a lot of them blow up. That's
2:18:56
what you have to do until you get one that doesn't blow up.
2:18:59
Yeah. And we
2:19:01
just need people in the world. This is very
2:19:03
much the, it's like the Teddy Roosevelt man in
2:19:05
the arena, you know, speech.
2:19:09
You need people in the arena who are actually trying
2:19:11
to do stuff, do important things.
2:19:14
You need people like that. And of
2:19:17
course, social media gives a platform for people who are
2:19:19
like not doing anything at all to
2:19:21
just sit and snicker at the few people in
2:19:23
the world who are trying to achieve something. Yeah,
2:19:26
but that's okay. That's okay too. That's their free
2:19:28
speech. You know, let, you know, if that's
2:19:30
what Stephen King wants to do today, let
2:19:32
them go. Who cares? You
2:19:34
know, it's interesting to watch. It's all of
2:19:36
it is interesting to watch. You
2:19:39
know, there's a lot of people out
2:19:41
there that are fools and they serve
2:19:44
as education to
2:19:46
others. You see the folly in
2:19:48
their actions and behaviors and how stupid they look
2:19:50
and how ridiculous this whole thing is. And
2:19:53
it's there for you. You learn from those
2:19:55
people. You
2:19:57
have a better understanding of human behavior. You have
2:19:59
a better understanding. people are capable
2:20:01
of being really interesting,
2:20:04
intelligent people, but also being buffoons at
2:20:06
the same time. And
2:20:09
that we're all subject to all
2:20:11
these various influences, and especially
2:20:13
through the use of social media, which just,
2:20:15
like I said before, it's an anxiety creating
2:20:17
machine. And there's so many
2:20:19
of these people that are attached to it that
2:20:21
are so deeply rooted in these online conversations and
2:20:24
so disconnected from the natural world. And
2:20:27
it's odd. It's odd to watch, but they're
2:20:29
there for you. They're there for an education,
2:20:31
an understanding, a greater understanding of
2:20:33
the weird nuances of human thinking.
2:20:37
Because that's genuinely what this whole thing is
2:20:39
all about. All the ideologies and all the
2:20:42
left and the right and the immigrants are great and
2:20:44
immigrants are terrible and they're eating ducks. All
2:20:47
of it is just human thinking, trying to
2:20:49
figure out what's the correct and incorrect way
2:20:51
that we all cohabitate and what's the best
2:20:54
way for all of us to sort of
2:20:56
get along. Yeah. I mean, that's the
2:20:58
catch-22 with social media because it could be, if
2:21:00
you use it exactly the right way, it does
2:21:03
give you access to all
2:21:05
these human beings and the way that they're thinking about things, which
2:21:09
could be quite enlightening. But
2:21:12
most people don't use it the right way. And also... You
2:21:15
have to use it the right way. And you can. This
2:21:17
is also why, in my opinion, none of my kids
2:21:19
have smartphones or social media. They're going to
2:21:21
get bullied. Well, they're
2:21:23
not on social media. They're going to get bullied
2:21:25
by... How old are your kids? All
2:21:27
of us are 11. That's young
2:21:29
enough. They shouldn't have social media. Yeah, I agree with you
2:21:31
there. But as they get into the high school
2:21:33
ages, I think it's
2:21:35
a new world. We're navigating it. They should learn how
2:21:38
to navigate it too. I think
2:21:40
it is very addictive, but also there's
2:21:42
people that know how to walk away
2:21:44
from it and know how to self-regulate. And I think
2:21:46
that's a valuable skill that I think everyone's going to
2:21:48
have to learn. Yeah, I think what
2:21:50
you... I mean, we haven't quite decided when
2:21:53
we're going to introduce this stuff to the kids. But once
2:21:55
again, at a certain point, yeah, I don't want them to
2:21:57
be 18. It's their first time ever holding
2:21:59
a cell phone. Because then you're just, then they
2:22:01
have no idea, we haven't given them the tools
2:22:03
to understand how to use this stuff, like the
2:22:05
emotional and intellectual tools.
2:22:09
So you gotta introduce it at some point, but most
2:22:13
kids today, I don't know what the latest figure is, but
2:22:16
millions of kids today have smartphones by the time they're like
2:22:18
eight or nine years old. A lot
2:22:20
of my kids, friends when they come
2:22:22
over, they're eight, nine, 10 years old and they've got phones, I
2:22:25
just think it's like, it
2:22:28
can only harm them. You understand, as a parent, you're
2:22:30
giving them something, at this age, they cannot use it
2:22:32
appropriately or correctly, they don't have the tools for it,
2:22:35
they're not old enough. It cannot
2:22:37
help them in their life, it can only harm them,
2:22:39
it can only do damage to them. I
2:22:41
think we're gonna look at it 20, 30 years from now, the
2:22:46
same way we look at people smoking. I
2:22:48
think we're gonna think, what we're doing, what we're
2:22:50
doing giving kids those goddamn phones, what did we
2:22:53
do? Like, we don't
2:22:55
even know what the kids of today who are on
2:22:57
the internet, who are subject to the same sort
2:22:59
of horrific images that you and I are talking about earlier. What
2:23:02
is that doing to people long term? I
2:23:04
never got exposed to anything like that when I was seven. How
2:23:07
many kids are getting exposed to murder videos
2:23:09
when they're 10 years old? Probably
2:23:11
quite a few. Pornography. Yeah, oh, that's the
2:23:14
craziest one, right? Because that was a hard
2:23:16
thing to get. It was
2:23:18
difficult. When I was a boy, we'd find
2:23:20
magazines in the woods. You knew a
2:23:22
guy who had a VHS tape, oh my God,
2:23:24
it was crazy, no one can find it. Now,
2:23:27
kids have it on their phones and it's instantaneous,
2:23:29
you have 5G on your phone. You can go
2:23:31
to any porn site any time you want. Yeah,
2:23:34
I mean, the average age of first exposure to pornography
2:23:36
now is like, I
2:23:38
think it's around 10 years old. I mean, it depends on,
2:23:40
I guess, what study you look at, but it's young. Yeah.
2:23:43
And it's not just, because, yeah, people sometimes will dismiss
2:23:45
the harms of it, but because they'll say, they'll
2:23:48
say, oh yeah, I found a Playboy under my
2:23:50
dad's mattress or whatever. Not the same. It's not
2:23:53
at all the same. I mean, the kind of
2:23:55
thing you're being exposed to, how often you're being
2:23:57
exposed to it, how ubiquitous it is now, how
2:23:59
readily. available it is it's not at all the
2:24:01
same you know we had the guys on from that
2:24:03
chimp crazy show you know that new
2:24:05
show on HBO where the people have pet chimps
2:24:08
no crazy it's the
2:24:10
same guys who did Tiger King oh
2:24:12
and it's amazing it's on max what
2:24:14
used to be HBO and
2:24:16
one of the things they said is the
2:24:18
chimps get addicted to pornography really yeah they
2:24:21
get addicted to pornography and they watch it
2:24:23
all the time like these certain chimps that
2:24:25
get older they give them iPads they give
2:24:27
them phones and they show them you know
2:24:29
they get on the internet and if someone
2:24:32
shows them pornography they get addicted to pornography
2:24:34
that's crazy that's crazy and they start
2:24:37
sexualizing human beings well
2:24:39
that kind of goes to show there's something primal about even just
2:24:41
the well obviously pornography but the
2:24:44
the phone the even
2:24:46
like my kit my two-year-old twins
2:24:50
they don't have phones obviously but there's
2:24:52
just something about the phone itself even if it's off
2:24:55
they just like to cool object yeah yeah and in
2:24:57
our kids we will you know they don't have tablets
2:24:59
not stuff but if we go on a long car
2:25:01
trip it's the one time we make an exception if
2:25:04
we're going like a 20-hour car trip just
2:25:06
so we don't just for our own sanity we'll let them
2:25:08
have tablets in the car just games and books and stuff
2:25:10
but then we get wherever we're going
2:25:13
take that we take the tablets away you don't get them anymore but
2:25:16
there's there's like a detox period of like two
2:25:18
or three days where they they're jonesing for it
2:25:20
they're constantly they can't they're constantly asking for it
2:25:22
and once you get past that they're fine again
2:25:24
but there's a real it's like there's something it
2:25:27
creates this compulsion and
2:25:29
kids take to it really quickly and
2:25:32
it just becomes a it's like a it becomes
2:25:34
another limb for them part of their
2:25:37
part of them somehow really quickly yeah
2:25:39
it's weird and the addictions
2:25:42
to phones which we all have
2:25:44
then the addictions of social media
2:25:47
which a lot of people have and
2:25:49
then you get these weird insulated
2:25:51
groups that live in echo chambers and
2:25:53
that's I think like one of the
2:25:55
things you highlight the most about this
2:25:57
show this am I racist film that you
2:26:00
you made is like the struggle
2:26:02
sessions where these people, like the
2:26:05
first scene where you, before
2:26:08
they know who you are, where you're
2:26:10
going and it's sitting there and talking to
2:26:12
these people about these things. Like who are
2:26:15
you? Like where do you live? How
2:26:17
do you think like this? Like what is
2:26:19
going on in your life that you've been
2:26:21
exposed to this version of the world that
2:26:24
seems so ridiculous to
2:26:26
someone who's not in that bubble? So ridiculous
2:26:28
that it seems fake. It seems like you're
2:26:30
doing like a Borat thing. Yeah. And
2:26:33
it's, yeah, we've gotten that with the movie people ask is it, is
2:26:36
that all real or did we stay? It's all
2:26:38
totally real. We didn't script any of it. And
2:26:40
that in particular is a, yeah, it's like a
2:26:42
support group for white people who
2:26:44
are struggling with their white grief because
2:26:47
they, they have privilege and they're grieving
2:26:49
their whiteness and their privilege. And
2:26:52
there's this woman, Brisha Wade, I think
2:26:54
is the name. The
2:26:57
black woman, she'll do these
2:26:59
sessions with white people where she'll kind of like talk them
2:27:01
through their whiteness and people
2:27:03
have people pay money to go and
2:27:05
sit around and, and talk to her.
2:27:07
And that was
2:27:09
another one that was like an hour and a half, two hours in
2:27:12
the room in real time. When
2:27:14
did they start figuring out who you were? At
2:27:19
some point mid midway through, they started, well,
2:27:21
they started looking at me strange because I
2:27:23
was intentionally making it really awkward just
2:27:26
cause it was funny. But
2:27:29
then I, as you can see in the movie, I got,
2:27:31
I get, I get emotional cause I'm on my own journey
2:27:33
of self discovery. And I had to leave cause there's one,
2:27:35
one rule that all these people have, we ran into this
2:27:38
multiple times is if you're
2:27:40
white, you're not allowed to cry in front of black
2:27:42
people cause that's white tears and
2:27:44
you can't shed white tears around black people cause
2:27:46
white tears are manipulative. So
2:27:48
in this place that she had a cry room. She said, if
2:27:51
you get emotional, you have to cry. Go to, we have a
2:27:53
room, get away from us and go cry over there.
2:27:57
So I, at one point I left to the cry room cause I was,
2:27:59
I was getting emotional. It's
2:28:01
a very emotional experience to confront my whiteness. And
2:28:06
I guess while I was gone, they
2:28:08
started talking to each other, like, who is this guy?
2:28:11
They looked it up and they were googling. And
2:28:14
then I came back. The whole thing had changed. The
2:28:16
tone had changed. They kicked me
2:28:18
out. It's a great scene. They call the cops. Well, when
2:28:20
the guy is saying, he's trying to hold your hand, trying
2:28:22
to grab you, and you're like, I'm not consent to be
2:28:24
touched. He's like, I'm not going to touch
2:28:26
you. I'm just going to answer your questions. Come on, come on,
2:28:28
answer your questions. He's going to answer your questions. Like, what kind
2:28:30
of answers are you going to give me, buddy? That
2:28:33
guy, too, I can say. One
2:28:36
of the people in that group
2:28:38
was a professional cuddler, actually. It's
2:28:41
not in the movie, but we just know that about
2:28:43
them. They get paid to cuddle with people? Yeah,
2:28:45
one of the people in the group. Jeez. A
2:28:48
cuddlist is what they call it. So these are...
2:28:51
They're fringe people. We thought about...
2:28:54
Somehow we could put up a lower third on
2:28:57
the screen to... But
2:28:59
it seems fake. It's like people don't...
2:29:01
Really, professional cuddler, come on. But
2:29:04
this is too crazy. These people exist out there. This is
2:29:06
a world that they live in. They
2:29:08
go to events like this, and they're very... They
2:29:12
have a lot of guilt for the fact that they're
2:29:14
white. There
2:29:17
were people crying in the circle. I mean, they
2:29:19
were getting really emotional talking about it. There's
2:29:22
the part where they... She says,
2:29:26
think about being white. What
2:29:28
emotions come up when you think about being white? And
2:29:31
then everyone goes around, and they're like, oh,
2:29:33
I have revulsion. I just feel... I
2:29:36
cringe. I feel cringe. Really? This
2:29:38
is you. You're talking about yourself.
2:29:42
It's just... It's sick. It's a
2:29:44
sickness. Yeah. Well, it
2:29:47
was very funny at the end, too. We
2:29:49
tried to get people... Spoiler alert. Tried to
2:29:51
get people to self-flagellate. Yeah.
2:29:58
And just a few people were like, that's
2:30:00
it. I'm out. Like slowly you lost like
2:30:02
a bunch of people over the course of
2:30:04
it. I didn't think, I mean we had
2:30:06
that plan as our last exercise when we
2:30:09
bring the whips out and we
2:30:11
debated like is anyone really gonna take a whip? I didn't
2:30:13
think anybody would. I
2:30:16
thought that this would be, because we needed an end for the
2:30:18
scene and so I thought I'd bring the whips out and everybody
2:30:20
would leave. And
2:30:23
so then that would be the end and then that would be,
2:30:25
that's our, because it's a narrative, we're trying to tell story. So
2:30:27
that would be the thing that shows me that
2:30:30
I've gone too far. But then they start taking the
2:30:32
whips. And I'm like, I
2:30:34
don't think I can actually have you beat yourself right
2:30:36
now, like liability, I don't know if I can do that. So
2:30:40
I was not expecting that. We lost a lot of people and
2:30:42
you asked who's the most racist person in the room? Yeah.
2:30:46
There was really the, right
2:30:49
before that, I mean, spoilers I guess,
2:30:51
but when
2:30:54
I'm berating my racist uncle. And
2:30:59
well, I don't know, you gotta watch it.
2:31:01
You gotta watch it. Yeah, that was for
2:31:03
me, the most shocking, making
2:31:05
the movie, the most shocking thing to
2:31:07
me that happened, that really took
2:31:10
me back, was in that moment and the way
2:31:12
they responded to it, which
2:31:14
I was not expecting. And it's
2:31:16
kind of dark. Yeah, they got aggressive with them.
2:31:18
Yeah. Yeah. It's
2:31:21
a great movie, man. And it's
2:31:23
just like what is a
2:31:25
woman in sort of the same vein of just,
2:31:28
it almost feels like satire, but
2:31:30
you realize it's not. It's just ridiculous.
2:31:33
But you do a great job. And you do a really
2:31:36
good job of staying calm and
2:31:38
dead panning, because I don't
2:31:40
have that skill. I
2:31:43
would not be able to hold it together. I would have
2:31:45
to start laughing. At some point in time, I would crack.
2:31:48
It's just, I wouldn't be able to not enjoy it
2:31:50
in the moment to the point where
2:31:53
I would go. That's the thing, you don't enjoy
2:31:55
it in the moment because it's actually, it's really
2:31:57
unpleasant in the moment you're in this environment with
2:31:59
these. insane people. Yeah.
2:32:01
It's exhausting listening
2:32:04
to this. How did you develop that
2:32:06
skill to do that though? Because
2:32:10
that's a skill. I
2:32:12
don't know if I... I
2:32:16
can't say I did anything to develop it. It's more just...
2:32:20
I just know what... We're making
2:32:22
a movie, so I'm aware of that the whole time. Obviously
2:32:25
if the cameras weren't rolling, I wouldn't be
2:32:27
reacting the same way. So
2:32:30
I'm just kind of keeping that in the back of my mind. This
2:32:33
is what we need for this scene. But
2:32:35
the main thing is we want to... With both movies. The
2:32:38
whole point is to create
2:32:41
an environment where the
2:32:43
other person feels comfortable saying what they actually
2:32:45
think and what they really believe and
2:32:48
doing what they would really do. And
2:32:50
that means not reacting. If you
2:32:52
laugh at them, they clam up. If
2:32:55
you argue with them, if you
2:32:57
show any real skepticism, they
2:33:00
clam up. They're not going to tell you what they really
2:33:02
believe. And then it's a boring movie because all you're getting
2:33:05
are the talking points. And that's especially the
2:33:07
case we found in this... That
2:33:09
was the case with What is Woman? We're talking to the trans activists.
2:33:12
But in this, when you're talking
2:33:14
to the race hustlers, they've been
2:33:16
doing it for a lot longer. The race hustle's
2:33:18
been around a lot longer than the trans hustle. And
2:33:21
they're pretty good at what they do. And they're
2:33:25
usually pretty sensitive to detecting
2:33:29
when someone's being skeptical. And if they get
2:33:31
that, then they kind
2:33:33
of go into a different mode. And they go into this kind
2:33:35
of HR, DEI mode where
2:33:37
everything's very sanitized, very surface
2:33:40
level. They're not going
2:33:42
to tell you this stuff about how all white
2:33:44
people are inherently racist. They're not going to get
2:33:46
into the really brutal, terrible racist stuff. So
2:33:50
we just stopped making this movie. How can we just
2:33:53
create an environment where they'll really be
2:33:56
themselves? The kookiest
2:33:58
version. and all that
2:34:00
required was just kind of being a blank slate and
2:34:03
asking questions. With this one, it required more of
2:34:05
a affirmatively
2:34:08
agreeing with them and
2:34:10
demonstrating that I'm fully on board
2:34:12
with this. There's a feel that
2:34:14
you have when you go into
2:34:16
it. If I was
2:34:18
there and I didn't know you, I'd be like,
2:34:21
I think this guy is fucking around. There's just
2:34:23
an edge, just a touch of it, just a
2:34:25
touch of it that makes it even funnier. Because
2:34:27
you're hanging in there and you're being dead planned.
2:34:30
But there's some moments where one of
2:34:32
my favorite moments was you asked Robin
2:34:35
DiAngelo what mansplaining was. And
2:34:38
then when she gave you a definition,
2:34:40
you mansplained her, you corrected her. And
2:34:44
she didn't even pick up with what you just did. Yeah.
2:34:48
I was proud of that. It's very
2:34:51
subtle. It's very subtle. I was stretching
2:34:53
when I was watching that, just laughing
2:34:55
really loud. Oh
2:34:58
my god. But the thing is, she did kind of.
2:35:01
And I think you can see it on camera. In the room, I
2:35:03
could tell. She
2:35:05
was kind of like, what did you just do? She
2:35:07
was trying to figure out in her head. I think she was trying to
2:35:10
sort through it. Is
2:35:12
this? But I think
2:35:14
she just couldn't. The
2:35:19
possibility that she was
2:35:21
in the room with someone who doesn't already agree
2:35:23
with her about everything, it's
2:35:25
unthinkable to her. She couldn't fathom it.
2:35:30
That's probably the first time in like 20 years
2:35:32
that she'd been in a room with someone who doesn't agree with her
2:35:35
on everything. Has she responded to the movie at all? No,
2:35:39
she took down her Twitter page. So
2:35:42
most of the people in the movie have
2:35:45
taken down their Twitter pages, deleted them. So
2:35:48
they're kind of, they're
2:35:51
going into a bubble somewhere. I mean, the truth
2:35:53
is there's not a lot they can say because
2:35:56
listen, if we deceptively edited it, if
2:35:59
we pulled any. like that, they'd happily come out and
2:36:01
say that. But they know that we didn't. Everything that's
2:36:03
in there is what they said. We didn't change anything.
2:36:07
It's all real, and they know that. So what
2:36:10
can they say? And especially in Robin DiAngelo's case,
2:36:14
she goes in a direction. She's
2:36:18
willing to do some things that are
2:36:20
quite embarrassing for her. But
2:36:24
we didn't put a gun to her. We didn't force her.
2:36:27
So what can she say? Well, listen, man,
2:36:30
congratulations. It's really funny. It's great. And I
2:36:32
think it's a great way to expose how
2:36:34
ridiculous some of this shit is. You can
2:36:36
expose it by being angry and yelling and
2:36:38
arguing with people on Twitter. But to do
2:36:41
it the way you did it and just
2:36:43
make it a hilarious hour and a half
2:36:45
movie is really good. So
2:36:47
kudos. Thank you, man. Appreciate it. Congratulations.
2:36:49
All right. Tell everybody where they can
2:36:51
see it. It's on dailywire.com. Actually,
2:36:54
it's in theaters. Oh, it's in theaters. It's in theaters right
2:36:56
now. Oh, nice. Nice. You can
2:36:58
get tickets at emiracist.com. Nice. So
2:37:00
we're trying to get it
2:37:02
out to make it available to whoever wants
2:37:05
to see it. It's very funny, folks. All
2:37:07
right. Thank you, Matt. Appreciate it. Thank you.
2:37:09
Bye, everybody. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.
2:37:12
Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.
2:37:14
Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.
2:37:17
Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.
2:37:19
Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.
2:37:21
Bye. Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More