Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Released Monday, 19th August 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Sardonicast 170: Trap, The Last Airbender (2010)

Monday, 19th August 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

40:00

There's still a chance to make the last

40:02

Airbender 2. I

40:05

think we can do it. Yeah, we

40:07

can go back to that trilogy bone. Oh,

40:10

man. Fire. Oh, boy.

40:13

Water. Air. Ground.

40:18

What would you like to bend if you could choose

40:21

one of those four? Space

40:23

time. Oh,

40:26

okay. Holy.

40:29

Well, the M

40:31

Night Shyamalan directed

40:35

a classic that

40:38

I recommended. And you know what? I'm

40:42

pretty happy about my recommendation, because

40:44

I like this movie. It's funny.

40:48

What? It's a funny

40:50

movie. Why do you like this movie? It's hilarious.

40:52

It's like the perfect. I like how much of

40:54

a disaster it is. It's not

40:57

boring for me. Because it's

40:59

always so silly. It's

41:02

not boring, but I

41:04

and I kind of felt the same way you

41:06

did until I watched the original show. And

41:08

now I have more of like a Lion King

41:11

2019 feeling towards this. But it's like, well,

41:13

it's yeah, because it's like I for the life

41:16

of me cannot figure out what the what the hell was

41:18

going on here. How did this

41:20

happen? How? Because

41:22

like we were just saying about this string of movies,

41:25

right? It's not like it's

41:27

not like this was greenlit and attached. Right after

41:29

the string of six cents unbreakable, maybe after signs

41:31

that was a big hit. Maybe if

41:34

then he was given this movie or

41:36

something and it was like a big passion project with

41:38

like his his kids always talked about and in reference

41:40

to this movie and his daughter's. Oh, he blames them

41:42

for every bad movie. That

41:44

was his excuse. But it's like, what

41:47

the fuck is the impetus of this movie? Because

41:49

he's clearly not interested in adapting it in any.

41:52

There's no passion in this movie. There's the

41:55

amount of money, the investment, the talent, the skill.

41:57

ILM did the effects for this. Like what? Why?

54:00

A lot of them are kind of doing like the Jaden

54:02

Smith eyes. The main character does

54:04

a lot, like the little pouty eyebrows and big,

54:09

uncomfortably close, close

54:11

ups sometimes in ways that it does

54:14

not feel justified in the scene. Fucking,

54:18

what's his name? Soka?

54:23

Which I think somebody- Oh, Soka. Yeah,

54:25

well, they call him Soka. He's a super

54:27

Soka. Can you trust this movie? No,

54:30

this is this movie, okay? This

54:33

is the camera. Yeah, you're right. It's

54:36

the real version. It's Aung and Soka. His

54:39

face throughout the entire movie, he was just like chewing

54:41

up the scenery. Like he was just, he

54:43

was the focus, even if he was in the background

54:46

of a shot, because his face was

54:48

just constantly so

54:50

funny. I wish he was in

54:52

every movie. There's something about his expression. Yeah,

54:56

he's awful. The,

54:59

I don't know what they tried to do with him, because he's

55:02

another kind of fun character in the, in

55:04

the original show. He's more like comic relief, which

55:07

they attempt a couple of times in the movie,

55:10

like early on the, can't

55:12

remember the name of the flying creature or whatever, but

55:14

it like, his tail slaps down and it's supposed to

55:16

be like, oh, some physical comedy, just

55:19

like in the show, remember that? But it's

55:21

like edited to be comedic.

55:24

And it's like, oh, you're clearly editing this to

55:27

have like a space for the audience to laugh, but it's like

55:31

dead silence and so awkward. Oh,

55:34

if it's awkward when he's not

55:36

trying to be comedic or like have a punchline to

55:38

a scene, like when he does it, it's like, it's

55:41

more often confusing than anything at the

55:43

intent that is so bad and

55:45

awkward. You like just don't know what it's even trying

55:47

to do. Yes.

55:53

Or even the line, you

55:56

think my son is the

55:59

one. I

1:02:00

guess as part of why it's lingered in

1:02:02

such a, it's definitely in the conversation

1:02:04

of like worst film of all time. Yes. People

1:02:07

will bring this one up like for sure with

1:02:09

that investment, with the butchering of the source material

1:02:12

with just, yeah, it's uniquely

1:02:14

bad. Even for M. Knight, it's

1:02:16

uniquely bad. I know. It

1:02:18

stands out. It's up there. And that's

1:02:21

crazy. Like how many times could it like, yeah,

1:02:26

I like have my head in my hands like watching this.

1:02:29

Yeah. With like ILM being in there and all

1:02:32

these resources and like hundreds of

1:02:34

people getting together to fulfill this

1:02:36

and they must have known, you

1:02:39

know? The

1:02:41

vibe on set, like the energy must have been

1:02:43

like, they would have known, come on. How

1:02:46

did this happen? Who

1:02:48

let this happen? Because everyone was humiliated

1:02:50

by it. Dev Patel is like

1:02:52

public about it. There are videos of him on

1:02:55

like red carpets like saying like, oh, sorry for this shit

1:02:57

film. He's like signing

1:03:00

the poster and whatnot. Everyone knows.

1:03:02

Yes. It's unanimous. It's

1:03:06

a shared experience. Very

1:03:09

few films can offer an experience

1:03:11

where everybody kind of feels the same

1:03:14

way about it.

1:03:17

Yeah. It's just

1:03:19

like from the very, very, very

1:03:21

base beginning. Who

1:03:23

thought this was a good idea? I know

1:03:25

this is before we had like prestige television and

1:03:27

that was more of like, it wasn't really an

1:03:29

option in 2010 in the same way that it

1:03:32

is now. So, oh, we have a full Netflix

1:03:34

Last Airbender show now that's like millions

1:03:38

of dollars for each episode and it's got CG everywhere

1:03:40

and it's like, it looks better than this film from

1:03:42

2010 type thing. But

1:03:47

what could you possibly achieve? Because the only way

1:03:49

you can make a film is you

1:03:52

have to sacrifice so much from the original thing

1:03:54

that made it good, then it's no longer resembling

1:03:56

the thing. So, it's like, why are you even

1:03:58

doing this? What did you

1:04:00

think you could achieve with this? It's

1:04:03

maddening to even break down.

1:04:05

It's time for you to stop doing this.

1:04:09

Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah,

1:04:11

like all of the story happens off screen

1:04:13

or like that through a random narration, you

1:04:15

know, like Sokko would be like, hey, we

1:04:17

just started a revolution. And so

1:04:20

what through that montage that was like 30 seconds. Oh,

1:04:22

yeah. Is that what that was? There

1:04:26

were several montages where

1:04:28

the implication of how things were

1:04:30

shot and edited and the music

1:04:32

along with it. You

1:04:35

would think that it's an actual montage, but it's just one

1:04:37

shot. And then the montage

1:04:39

is over. It's not a montage if it's

1:04:42

one shot of the several things that are

1:04:44

implied to be happening, but we see one

1:04:46

shot of it. But this happened several

1:04:48

times in the film where it's like we get a one

1:04:50

shot montage, which I think is incredible.

1:04:56

Experimental in a way. Yes. Yes,

1:04:58

this is an experimental

1:05:01

film by an auteur. A

1:05:05

true artist. But

1:05:07

there are still more

1:05:10

examples of like just the baseline, like

1:05:12

writing, just making

1:05:14

no sense with the world they have

1:05:16

established. Like kind of like the prison

1:05:18

sequence where the earthbenders forget that they

1:05:20

can use Earth. Aang does the same

1:05:23

thing with water towards the end, where

1:05:25

like there's a big

1:05:27

kind of helms deep siege sequence

1:05:29

with this ice water castle.

1:05:32

And Aang like wins

1:05:35

the day by a spirit dragon telling

1:05:38

him, oh, use the water of the ocean.

1:05:40

Idiot. He's like, yeah.

1:05:42

Yeah. Oh, yeah. I guess I can

1:05:44

bend water. Why don't I just make a big wall of

1:05:46

water and put out the fire

1:05:48

with it? Like they actually have

1:05:50

an enormous advantage, actually, the

1:05:53

waterbenders and having like the ice fortress

1:05:55

and the fire dudes that can

1:05:57

only use a fire of the

1:05:59

ocean. there's a source nearby. So like, all

1:06:02

the people that can control water telepathically

1:06:05

or whatever, like, what is

1:06:07

the tension there? Yeah, there's not much of a threat.

1:06:09

But then I guess they try to like artificially create

1:06:11

one with when they kill the fish. Yeah,

1:06:15

which is a whole like quite cool setup in

1:06:17

the show where they have this rule where water

1:06:20

bending is enhanced by placement of the moon,

1:06:22

just kind of like the ocean is and

1:06:24

fire bending is affected by like comets and

1:06:26

the sun and stuff like this. And

1:06:29

depending on these natural events, like powers

1:06:32

can balance or be

1:06:34

imbalanced. And in

1:06:36

the show, it feels way more like

1:06:39

a Helm's Deep situation where they're like, way

1:06:41

outmatched, and they've got to use the advantage of

1:06:43

the eclipse to help them

1:06:45

and this kind of stuff. But they just

1:06:47

there's like no interest than even establishing these

1:06:50

things, you know, the whole the fish stuff

1:06:52

and the spirits and all of

1:06:54

that, which is so core to the show. And it's

1:06:56

a huge part of its identity. It's like used for

1:06:59

just like cheap writing tricks. Does

1:07:02

it get resolved in the same way in the

1:07:04

show where this new

1:07:07

character that no one cares about who's

1:07:09

in a relationship with Dev or sorry,

1:07:11

with Sokka? That does happen except it's

1:07:13

fleshed out and it has like a

1:07:15

advances the Sokka character. It's like a

1:07:17

big change for him. It's like a

1:07:20

serious dramatic beat for the characters to go through

1:07:22

when he's been like this comedic kind of goofy

1:07:24

guy for the whole time. And it's yeah, the

1:07:26

characters like learn and change and there's consequence for

1:07:28

what's going on. And the spirit

1:07:30

stuff is like a recurring well-building

1:07:33

thing through the show. And that's how

1:07:35

he he beats them. He uses like

1:07:37

a water spirit to win

1:07:40

over in that sequence instead of just a huge

1:07:42

wave of water because I guess you could just

1:07:44

do that whenever. Yeah, there's loads

1:07:47

of stuff like that. All the complexity, all of the

1:07:49

fun world building, all of the awesome stuff like that

1:07:51

is just totally

1:07:53

kneecapped because that's again, one of

1:07:55

the cooler things about the show is that they establish

1:07:58

these concepts and take them to their logical extremes. like

1:08:01

when they go into like blood bending with the

1:08:03

water people and all the stuff that fire people.

1:08:06

It's like really cool and creative like what they

1:08:08

do with it and all the inspirations like coming

1:08:10

together. It's not the most original thing but it's

1:08:12

a really great like kids

1:08:15

show that opens up to

1:08:17

some pretty complex ideas and these really great

1:08:19

fun characters. Yeah there seem

1:08:21

to be you know

1:08:24

when the little critter

1:08:26

a tiny thing that

1:08:28

like knocks over the stroll scroll like

1:08:31

earlier like monkey little thing. There's

1:08:33

a part where it's like crawling

1:08:40

around on his his arms his shoulders.

1:08:42

He's like doing this reverse

1:08:45

like I'm a waiter at a restaurant holding

1:08:47

up a plate sort of thing. Yeah like

1:08:50

swapping his arms back and forth and you

1:08:52

just look at that shot and it's like

1:08:54

wow there was absolutely no communication between departments

1:08:56

in terms of like yeah

1:08:58

there was was there a visual

1:09:00

effects supervisor on set because it

1:09:02

seemed like no like like

1:09:05

it seemed like M Knight was just like I got this

1:09:08

and and didn't have a proper

1:09:10

comprehension of how the computer animated effects

1:09:12

would be placed into the scene or

1:09:14

like how to give it some actual

1:09:16

convincing weight or how to have the

1:09:19

actors be acting as though there's something

1:09:21

in the scene. It just feels like

1:09:23

everything that's happening in live action feels

1:09:27

separate and incidental to the

1:09:29

computer animated effects that are placed

1:09:31

later and not just the monkey

1:09:33

also like all of the bending

1:09:35

effects it's like all of

1:09:37

the Tai Chi motions that they're doing seem

1:09:40

incidental to the

1:09:42

the bending effects

1:09:45

that are taking place in the universe like

1:09:47

they can feel completely separate which is

1:09:49

a huge problem for this

1:09:51

type of movie. It's a huge

1:09:54

problem. I

1:09:57

read that he's storyboarded this is what I just don't

1:09:59

understand like how We got the winners.

1:10:01

How do you even shoot a

1:10:03

shot like that Prison Escape one

1:10:06

and not have meticulously

1:10:08

thought about the it's a visual effect shot.

1:10:10

Like that's what it is. That's the whole

1:10:12

point of it. It's like a big spectacle

1:10:15

like money shot basically. The

1:10:18

answer is ego is confidence. Just

1:10:22

yes men around him. Yeah. Yeah.

1:10:25

It's a overconfidence. Overconfidence.

1:10:28

But why would they give the Golden Goose like

1:10:30

this? Why would they give such

1:10:32

creative control? Because it's

1:10:34

M. Knight. Why are they not more protective?

1:10:38

But that's what I don't understand either because it's not like

1:10:40

M. Knight was at the peak of his career at this

1:10:42

point. Like at no angle you look at this or try

1:10:44

and deconstruct it from does it make sense? None.

1:10:47

He just had one flap. He had one flap before

1:10:49

this movie. Yeah. But

1:10:51

it was the happening. Yeah.

1:10:54

But this is probably already in production by the

1:10:56

time like the happening was in theaters. Maybe

1:10:59

when was that happening? Maybe it

1:11:01

was earlier. Yeah. And

1:11:04

this came out 2010. So

1:11:07

they probably they were probably already had like

1:11:09

the contract signed and everything. Yeah.

1:11:12

It feels like he walked in to something

1:11:14

that really existed and just I

1:11:17

don't know just first take

1:11:19

every every shot feels like a first

1:11:21

take. Every single one like that.

1:11:25

The close up of Aang it's in

1:11:27

the it's like a flashback scene when he

1:11:29

finds out about the what happened to his

1:11:31

monk village. It's like a close up

1:11:34

on his face and he's like kind of dribbling

1:11:36

and he's like the actor moves his lip to

1:11:38

like catch the dribble and stuff and it's like

1:11:41

that's really distracting for the short you don't think you

1:11:43

could have done that again. You know what you don't

1:11:45

have a version of that that doesn't have him doing

1:11:47

that. So

1:11:49

many shots are like that. There was a

1:11:52

sticky quality. It's like so lazy. Crispy

1:11:55

on a quality. Yeah. There's

1:12:00

another line. I mean like every line's good. And

1:12:02

every line delivery is good. Katara,

1:12:09

do not hit that sphere! The word

1:12:11

sphere was ruined for

1:12:14

me for this film. Here's

1:12:16

a fun little fact. So

1:12:18

I've seen this movie many, many times. I was

1:12:21

due for a rewatch, which is why I chose it. And you know,

1:12:23

new M Night movie coming out. I like

1:12:25

to make it a bit of a, you know, like an

1:12:27

event. You know? I

1:12:29

was excited for M Night to get some money

1:12:31

again. That was my excitement for

1:12:33

Trap. But I have the

1:12:35

Blu-ray of The Last Airbender. And

1:12:39

I wound up watching it off stream for

1:12:41

reasons that I'll explain on my stream on another day

1:12:44

and not important. But I noticed

1:12:46

on the Blu-ray, because this is one of those

1:12:48

like big

1:12:50

Blu-rays. They had described

1:12:52

video for the visually impaired. So

1:12:57

since I've seen this movie so many times

1:12:59

already, I was like, okay, we're gonna experience

1:13:01

it anew. And

1:13:03

I watched the film with described

1:13:05

video for the visually

1:13:07

impaired. And it was also very funny. And

1:13:11

the narrator, they got the guy with

1:13:13

like the, one of

1:13:15

the worst voices, where it sounded like, it

1:13:23

was a very British man, but it

1:13:26

wasn't like a nice, like soothing

1:13:28

British. It was like somewhere between,

1:13:32

it was like really nasally and

1:13:35

like not quite David

1:13:37

Firth. It's a Cottney Geezer. Almost,

1:13:39

somewhere between David Firth and

1:13:42

like Steve Coogan doing an impression of

1:13:44

like a BBC reporter talking about like

1:13:46

tennis. You

1:13:49

know? Okay.

1:13:52

Okay. It was just like almost like

1:13:54

a sports cast announcer, but like a really boring one. It

1:13:57

was a really like awful nasally boring voice. See if

1:13:59

it's perfect. Oh, it was great. It was so

1:14:01

good. And what was fascinating about this is

1:14:04

I wrote down two time stamps in the

1:14:07

movie. So obviously in this

1:14:09

M Night film, the character's name is

1:14:12

Ong. And in the

1:14:14

original show, it's Aang. But there

1:14:16

are two moments in the

1:14:18

described video narration where he says Aang.

1:14:22

The rest of the film he says Ong. Oh, interesting. But there

1:14:24

are two moments where you like let it slip. And

1:14:27

so my theory, we're getting another theory

1:14:29

here. My theory is that the person

1:14:31

doing the voiceover is actually Team Aang. Like

1:14:33

he has to have seen the show before

1:14:36

for that to slip because otherwise there would be one way

1:14:38

to pronounce it. So he has to have known about the

1:14:41

original show. And my feeling

1:14:43

is that he's Team Aang. And

1:14:45

at the very end, like it was like

1:14:47

the perfect ending for this movie. I laughed

1:14:49

out loud because the described

1:14:51

video, they also read a lot of the credits.

1:14:53

And so the big credit right at the end

1:14:55

was like written, directed and produced

1:14:58

by M Night Shyamala. And the way he pronounced it,

1:15:00

it was like, OK, you're intentionally

1:15:02

mispronouncing M Night's name as revenge

1:15:04

for Aang. So

1:15:07

he said written, I can't even

1:15:09

do the accent, written, directed and produced by

1:15:12

M Night Shyamalan.

1:15:16

Shyamalan, he says. And then

1:15:19

like, you know, reads out some more credits.

1:15:21

And then there's a second M Night credit

1:15:23

where he doubles down. And the second time

1:15:25

he says it, like anybody who has this

1:15:27

Blu-ray, please watch this. Like I'm not crazy.

1:15:29

The second time he says it, the way

1:15:31

that he says it sounds so spiteful

1:15:34

and like, yeah, I'm mispronouncing your

1:15:36

name. And M Night Shyamalan

1:15:38

film like he literally says it like

1:15:40

that. It's crazy. Like this dude was

1:15:42

Team Aang and this was his this

1:15:45

was his vengeance. He

1:15:48

got revenge. He's like, how does it feel?

1:15:50

M Night Shyamalan. Because

1:15:54

that's ironically one of the most consistent things about

1:15:56

the movie is that they all they all agreed.

1:15:59

Like let's let's say. the main character's name wrong.

1:16:01

That's the one thing we're going to get right is saying

1:16:03

it wrong. Make him say, uggh.

1:16:06

Unggh. What

1:16:09

the fuck? Yeah. And like, you're

1:16:12

kind of talking about the conspiracy theories with choosing

1:16:14

M. Knight, but do you remember

1:16:16

anything about the controversy about this

1:16:19

film when it came out? Which

1:16:21

controversy? Specifically about the casting over

1:16:23

the Fire Nation. Yeah.

1:16:25

Which seems like a M. Knight

1:16:28

choice where they're mostly played by like

1:16:30

kind of Indian actors, which is a change

1:16:32

from the original, I'd say, where they're

1:16:34

more kind of like Chinese coded, I

1:16:36

would say. Not

1:16:38

the biggest deal, but it's I guess it's

1:16:40

just kind of interesting why do

1:16:44

you do that with the villains? Well, I

1:16:46

mean, I don't know. I just I think that

1:16:48

this decision was probably made by

1:16:50

higher reps before he was even involved to

1:16:52

like get it green lit was like good

1:16:54

characters need to be the lightest skinned and

1:16:57

we can have some representation. But so I guess

1:16:59

we're just leaving that to the the bad characters

1:17:01

can be the darker skinned

1:17:04

characters. I honestly just think that that's

1:17:06

how they were going to make the movie. And then they got

1:17:08

M. Knight to to make it

1:17:10

seem like less of a racist decision. And they're like,

1:17:12

you just say you did the whole thing. I guess.

1:17:14

Yeah. Like, I'm just thinking out like what big

1:17:18

Asian American actors even, you know,

1:17:20

in 2010 in Hollywood. So, yeah. Hmm.

1:17:26

Not like they had name actors selling the movie,

1:17:28

but, you know, I think that that that was

1:17:31

a it.

1:17:33

I think I think it fits within that time

1:17:35

period in terms of like, OK, we're

1:17:37

going to put a lot of money into this. It's an

1:17:39

existing IP. How do we

1:17:41

get the movie made? We can't have the darker

1:17:44

skinned characters be the main cast.

1:17:46

Right. So I think I literally think

1:17:48

that that it just it seems like

1:17:50

it fits in 2010. So, yeah. Whereas

1:17:52

the I did check out the first

1:17:55

episode of the twenty twenty four version

1:17:58

still being adapted to this day. And

1:18:01

yeah, it doesn't have that same problem. They

1:18:03

actually have, you know, Asian actors and it's

1:18:06

just way less distracting as a result. Like

1:18:09

the characters actually resemble who they

1:18:11

are in the show as far

1:18:13

as like, not just like a race thing,

1:18:15

but like the way they're written, you know,

1:18:17

and characterized. They actually, oh, it's a little

1:18:19

bit of that thing that I like. There's

1:18:21

still like a Netflix kind of corporate, a

1:18:24

translation of it that's like, it's

1:18:27

just too much going on. It's too like just

1:18:30

adding detail. I feel like there

1:18:32

was like a brevity to some of this stuff. The

1:18:35

original show has a certain level of

1:18:37

brevity. It's like three seasons. Each season

1:18:39

is just Aang learning one

1:18:41

of the three elements he doesn't know. Then it wraps up

1:18:43

and ends. And it knows

1:18:45

what not to tell you or indulge in.

1:18:49

The Netflix show, it starts with this full

1:18:51

30 minute prequel set up of the monk

1:18:53

falling and it's like this whole siege. And

1:18:55

it's like, that was kind of cooler in my head actually,

1:18:58

the way that went down. Like in the

1:19:00

original show, the way it was revealed through flashbacks and how

1:19:02

it was more from like the main character and

1:19:04

like flushing them out instead of

1:19:07

just this scale. And

1:19:09

like, we need to show how much CG and like

1:19:11

we've got to show off like how big and Hollywood

1:19:13

this is. And so we're kind of missing the forest

1:19:15

here. Like, could we just

1:19:17

focus on like what made this thing good to begin

1:19:19

with? Like really just

1:19:21

getting lost down with this bullshit with this.

1:19:26

You just wanted a sticky movie, sticky

1:19:28

and crispy, like

1:19:30

some Korean fried chicken. I mean, it's

1:19:32

definitely it's definitely sticky. Probably

1:19:35

not in the way he hoped or intended. And to

1:19:38

be like the way he's managed to shed

1:19:40

this and still work, I could keep coming back to

1:19:42

this is like I'm following

1:19:44

this up with after Earth as well. Like three years

1:19:46

later, it's like this. That's how I'm going to undo

1:19:48

this. What a combo. The

1:19:52

one to smack like one, two, three.

1:19:54

The happening was like the three in

1:19:57

a row. of

1:20:00

some of the best three knockouts, best

1:20:03

comedies that have ever

1:20:05

existed. It is, we've like talked

1:20:07

about like trilogies that

1:20:09

aren't actually trilogies, but like kind of workers,

1:20:12

there's a good one, right? Release that as

1:20:14

a box set. That's a powerful trilogy. 4K.

1:20:17

Yeah, yeah. Happening last Airbender after

1:20:19

Earth, I would go crazy over

1:20:21

that. Like

1:20:24

he's always, he's talked about the stickiness, the

1:20:27

sticky quality, I think he added

1:20:29

an extra letter accidentally, he made his stinky

1:20:31

movie. That was the

1:20:33

problem. Yeah, he's kind of a fascinating guy.

1:20:35

Like you sent me that video of that

1:20:37

weird interview of him talking about Despicable Me.

1:20:40

Oh yeah. And it's just

1:20:43

like drooling over Despicable Me's title. Now

1:20:45

that's a sticky name. Despicable Me,

1:20:47

that's clever right there. I hope I do something

1:20:49

that clever one day. And say what? You

1:20:52

made the sixth sense, you know. The quote was like,

1:20:54

I wish I was that smart. Yeah.

1:20:58

Despicable Me title. Yeah,

1:21:04

he's a character release and I will

1:21:06

be there for his nonsense, but like.

1:21:08

Same forever. I'm not gonna be happy about it.

1:21:12

Yeah. You know, yeah,

1:21:14

despite being upset with

1:21:17

Trap and somehow disappointed,

1:21:20

I still got to watch another

1:21:22

classic M Night. I'm glad we

1:21:25

made this a double feature. Yeah, they go

1:21:27

together well. Because it reminded me about why I

1:21:29

love him so much. Yeah.

1:21:33

No actually, no. I can't agree with that. Well,

1:21:38

I had fun. What

1:21:41

do you say? One out of 10? Yeah,

1:21:44

they're just the lowest of the low. Like I

1:21:46

almost refused to rate it. Like this is one

1:21:48

where like I checked on Letterboxd and whatnot where

1:21:50

all the people I follow, you can see their

1:21:52

ratings. And normally there is some disparity, you know,

1:21:54

some exploration of the scale. But

1:21:57

on this one, it's like almost unanimous. Like

1:21:59

everyone. Just putting it on the lowest of

1:22:01

the low. When I'm right there with

1:22:03

them, like this is a half star one out of 10. It's

1:22:05

like completely inept from every

1:22:07

angle. There's, there's genuinely not one single thing that

1:22:09

does well. Not one. Didn't mention the music. Yeah,

1:22:12

the music's kind of annoying. Loads of great themes.

1:22:15

Yeah, because there's no, how are you supposed to

1:22:17

score like this weird montage movie, how you, there

1:22:19

are no scenes. Yeah. You know, like there are

1:22:21

whole chase sequences that are over before they've even

1:22:23

begun. So it's like, how can you, how can

1:22:25

you score that? How can you like build? It's an

1:22:28

interesting challenge. Yeah. Yeah.

1:22:31

Fuck this one. Love

1:22:34

it. All right. Question time. Man,

1:22:37

let's do a few questions here before we wrap up

1:22:39

the show. Then from the Saldana cast community, head

1:22:42

over to the suggestion thread over on the subreddit. Just

1:22:45

like the backwards man did a

1:22:47

few trips. What

1:22:49

are your thoughts on Joaquin Phoenix dropping out of his

1:22:51

film with Todd Haynes? If you aren't

1:22:54

aware, Phoenix was going to star in a sexually explicit

1:22:56

NC 17 queer film directed by Haynes.

1:22:59

The idea for the film was pitched by Phoenix and

1:23:01

he was involved in writing the screenplay just days before

1:23:03

filming was to start though. He decided to drop out

1:23:05

the film after getting cold feet. Apparently it isn't possible

1:23:07

to recast his role and everyone who's supposed to work

1:23:09

on the film is out of a job. The film

1:23:11

is now expected to lose over seven figures due to

1:23:13

all the money that's already been put into it and

1:23:16

because some people working on the film still need to

1:23:18

be paid. So

1:23:21

it's been a bit of a drama. Well, that sucks.

1:23:23

Whose pocket is that coming out of? Yeah,

1:23:25

studios and producers probably. I

1:23:28

guess. I wonder what

1:23:30

it would be about that that made him drop out because it's

1:23:32

not like it's he's in a

1:23:34

lot of like challenging roles. Yeah.

1:23:37

You know, the term of comfort zone. I

1:23:39

wonder what it was about this project in particular that

1:23:41

gave him the cold feet. Not gay enough. I

1:23:45

don't know. Not gay enough. This

1:23:48

is one of these things where it's like we

1:23:50

don't know anything about like the reasons

1:23:52

why he would have to not do it. And

1:23:55

so it's not I don't know how to

1:23:57

speculate when like the film. Didn't

1:24:00

even get made. So yeah, and

1:24:02

you got no details. It sucks because I love

1:24:04

Todd Haynes and I love Joaquin would

1:24:07

have loved to see them work together do

1:24:09

a gay thing and Sucks

1:24:12

for people that are out of a job and it sucks

1:24:14

that a lot of money was wasted But

1:24:17

I have no idea what happened. So Yeah,

1:24:22

you just need more context to be able to

1:24:24

comment because a lot of people Say

1:24:27

like oh, he's been so selfish about this and

1:24:30

We don't really know like What

1:24:32

actually went down? It's not the first time

1:24:34

I guess a big production has fallen apart

1:24:36

and money's been lost or written off and

1:24:40

It's a risky business. I guess Wouldn't

1:24:42

be the first time someone like this has happened. It's just Consequential

1:24:46

I guess that Phoenix is attached. Yeah,

1:24:48

it seems the whole thing just can't happen

1:24:51

without him after a certain point. So Yeah,

1:24:55

especially if he was you know producing

1:24:57

and writing and such a direct involvement.

1:24:59

It's Kind of being sold on

1:25:01

him. So very

1:25:03

unfortunate But that's

1:25:05

like the risk of the industry, you know Okay, a

1:25:07

lot of projects ride or die on one

1:25:10

person and if that doesn't

1:25:12

work out then things kind of dead. Yeah Um

1:25:18

Metal gear gas has this to say

1:25:20

did you follow the Olympics at all?

1:25:22

I'd love to hear your reactions to

1:25:24

the breakdancing event that has gone somewhat

1:25:26

viral. Love you, too. Thanks for the

1:25:28

hours of entertainment I didn't

1:25:30

actually see how Canada does in the

1:25:32

Olympics you you guys any good over

1:25:34

there? Apparently Vancouver guy won the breakdancing.

1:25:36

I Was

1:25:39

that who won that yeah because it was

1:25:41

Australia right that was like the embarrassing I

1:25:45

watched those two things and I did not watch

1:25:47

much else of the Olympics. I've seen some

1:25:50

popular photos and moments the

1:25:53

guy retrieving some the cap in the pool the

1:25:57

unsanitary water conditions in Paris

1:26:00

that got a lot of the swimmers sick. Oh, I

1:26:02

didn't know that though cuz there's there's too much poopy

1:26:04

in the water Yeah,

1:26:07

yeah, isn't that crazy You

1:26:11

know what? There always seems to be some sort of like goes

1:26:13

and fuck up where it's like

1:26:15

Oh, they easily could have anticipated

1:26:18

this The

1:26:20

thing that pisses me off the most about this year's

1:26:22

Olympics is that there's this big like

1:26:26

crazy Unhinged

1:26:29

like attack like

1:26:31

every fucking grifter is is

1:26:35

Claiming that an Algerian

1:26:37

boxer is not a

1:26:39

woman. You're right. Yeah, and that she's definitely

1:26:41

a man because of some

1:26:44

Some test that's not even an official

1:26:46

test where we don't even have the

1:26:48

results of that test That

1:26:51

was done for another event that

1:26:53

like it's like a Russian organization that

1:26:55

no one can even like verify but

1:26:59

They were like people are just

1:27:01

insisting Even though we don't even know

1:27:03

the results of this test just that

1:27:05

she failed it people are insisting that means

1:27:08

that Because she had

1:27:10

like she has an extra

1:27:12

chromosome or like a different chromosome or something

1:27:14

Even though she's born a woman that like

1:27:17

they're saying she's a man which seems inconsistent

1:27:19

because all these other same people I thought

1:27:21

were like completely genital essentialists

1:27:23

when it came to What

1:27:26

is a man? What is a woman like what what what you

1:27:29

all changed your mind today? But

1:27:33

yeah, so they're they're Algeria

1:27:35

where it is illegal

1:27:38

to be trans They

1:27:40

think that Algeria sent a

1:27:44

male trans male boxer to

1:27:47

beat up a woman at the Olympics

1:27:50

and that Literally did

1:27:52

not happen and that is somehow

1:27:54

getting more outrage on

1:27:56

social media from the protect the children

1:27:58

crowd then then the

1:28:02

guy who actually like

1:28:06

raped a child, who's at

1:28:08

the Olympics? Oh

1:28:10

my God. Like, and they're not really talking

1:28:12

about that one? It's,

1:28:14

yeah, they just whipped up into a frenzy because

1:28:17

I guess the media told them to. I just,

1:28:19

the culture was, oh my

1:28:21

God, it's an invasion. We're being, oh my God,

1:28:23

like, what was that? It's a

1:28:25

crazy stat of like how many, Americans

1:28:28

were polled of like what percentage of people they think

1:28:30

are trans, like in the country. It's

1:28:32

like 40%, like some of them thought. And

1:28:35

it's like, what do you, what world are

1:28:37

you actually living in? Like, you've been like

1:28:39

whipped up into a frenzy over, it's just

1:28:41

lies and hatred spread online. Well, the less

1:28:44

common a group

1:28:46

is, the more marginalized a group

1:28:49

is, the easier it is to misrepresent

1:28:51

and create caricatures of them, because there's going

1:28:54

to be a lot of people that

1:28:56

are only fed what they've seen on social media.

1:28:59

And their idea of a trans person

1:29:01

is like the person who had

1:29:04

a freak out at GameStop. And

1:29:06

that's what they, like, because they, they've

1:29:08

either never met a trans person, or don't know

1:29:10

that they've met a trans person. Like,

1:29:13

you used to be able to do the exact same thing with

1:29:15

gay people, but now it's

1:29:18

like, okay, everybody kind of at least knows a gay person.

1:29:22

Right? So, for

1:29:26

reason next. Yeah. Next on the chopping

1:29:28

block. It's been, yeah, we're just

1:29:30

the way, something's

1:29:33

like shifting lately with

1:29:35

the way social media is like affecting reality. I

1:29:37

don't know how much you know about like the

1:29:39

riots in the UK and all this shit about

1:29:41

the Olympics. Like people are, they're

1:29:44

doing things based off

1:29:46

this bullshit that's spread

1:29:48

online. These bad faith, moneyed interests,

1:29:50

you know? It's really kind of a scary

1:29:52

situation we're in. I don't really know what

1:29:55

the fucking solution is. Yeah, it's sad. Yeah,

1:29:57

we got here from the Olympics, but... Sad

1:29:59

and concerning just

1:30:02

how easily duped people are

1:30:06

in ways where it's like, okay, wait, like

1:30:09

your perspective is that like you found the

1:30:11

real scoop that they won't tell you. But

1:30:14

if you had that perspective, if you valued having

1:30:16

that, you'd

1:30:19

think that you'd value the truth

1:30:21

more, you'd think that you'd value

1:30:23

accuracy, you'd think that you'd do

1:30:25

like one fucking search and

1:30:28

the wealth of information and it's all at her fucking

1:30:31

fingertips. You'd think that you just do like, a

1:30:34

little bit of like, could I possibly

1:30:36

be wrong about this thing that I read on

1:30:38

Twitter? None of you are doing that. Well,

1:30:40

you can find anything now. Well simultaneously

1:30:43

you can find anything, any evidence for

1:30:45

anything, but also you can not believe

1:30:48

anything. There literally is no evidence for

1:30:50

it. Like it's thoroughly debunked. It's thoroughly

1:30:52

debunked. From the way they

1:30:54

process information, they do though. Evidence to them

1:30:56

is fucking libs of TikTok said it. Exactly,

1:30:59

yeah. They get entire worldviews from disingenuous

1:31:01

headlines or just straight up lies

1:31:03

spread by like, the richest man

1:31:05

in the world who owns eggs.

1:31:07

That's crazy. It's

1:31:11

actually crazy. So

1:31:14

annoying. Yeah, and then I guess that's the

1:31:16

conversation about the Olympics now. Everyone's

1:31:19

getting like transvestigated. Andrew

1:31:24

Tate's trans. Not yes. Kyle

1:31:28

Rittenhouse is trans. Everyone's

1:31:32

trans. Yeah, I guess

1:31:34

it also seemed like a bigger deal than last

1:31:37

time, because that was like slap bang in COVID.

1:31:39

So I think it was in Japan last time

1:31:41

and there's unfortunate images of like all the empty

1:31:45

colosseums or whatever. So

1:31:48

yeah, it was a bit of a catch up. But

1:31:50

this one seemed like a bigger deal. Clips everywhere,

1:31:52

memes everywhere. That Turkish guy with

1:31:54

the gun, the pole vaulter ruined

1:31:57

it with his dick, smacking the beam.

1:32:00

There's some good clips, there's some

1:32:02

good moments. Yes. I

1:32:04

like it as a concept, it's cool. Maybe

1:32:07

Olympics, the

1:32:09

sportsmanship. Yeah. The

1:32:11

concept's better than the organization. There's a hilarious

1:32:14

stat that came out recently in the UK

1:32:16

that was like one in five

1:32:18

Brits thinks that if

1:32:20

they were given five years, they could compete

1:32:22

in the Olympics. Oh, good.

1:32:25

That's great. 20% of people think

1:32:27

that they're top three in the world. Yeah.

1:32:31

It's like, you basically need to be groomed into the shit

1:32:33

to be like the best in the world. You need to

1:32:36

start when you're like four, if not younger. And

1:32:38

then have enough money to dedicate your life to doing

1:32:40

it even though you're not getting into it. Yeah. That's

1:32:43

what I was thinking about. How do you have

1:32:45

a lifestyle where you can dedicate your

1:32:48

life to some random shooting or something? Yeah.

1:32:51

Generation. Then you look at all the sports that UK

1:32:54

is good at. You look at it like the bougie sports, rowing

1:32:57

and water boat, and

1:33:00

shit like that. Making horses dance. Yeah.

1:33:04

Straight up. Yeah,

1:33:09

it's weird. Is

1:33:11

the Olympics over now? Yeah,

1:33:13

yeah. That's how much I pay attention to it is like

1:33:15

every once in a while I'll see a thing posted on

1:33:18

social media. Yeah, I didn't watch any of

1:33:20

it. I just watched clips. I like looking

1:33:22

at the metal table every couple of days.

1:33:26

Just seeing where everyone came. I have no idea how many

1:33:28

medals went to anyone. That's how much

1:33:30

I care. Yeah.

1:33:34

What's over now? Now, what's

1:33:36

the next thing we can get angry about? Winter

1:33:38

Olympics. Next drama. Winter

1:33:41

Olympics, yeah. Dials

1:33:46

smart, as this is to say. For

1:33:49

both of you, but mainly Adam, we know how

1:33:51

much you rightfully hate John Favreau's Lion King and

1:33:53

probably Jungle Book. But what do you think about

1:33:55

his other films, both as a writer and director,

1:33:57

swingers, maid, elf, zathura,

1:33:59

iron? Man 1 and 2, Chef, Cowboys

1:34:02

and Aliens. We

1:34:05

talked about John Favreau, like, as a director very

1:34:07

much. He's, I remember him coming up in that

1:34:09

kind of director for hire. Exactly. It was a

1:34:11

term for it. He doesn't have much of a

1:34:13

style. He's just like bland. He's very bland. No,

1:34:16

he kind of pioneered that Disney style

1:34:19

almost. You know?

1:34:21

Kind of, yeah. Like

1:34:23

the kind of synthetic, like, it's not like the Tim Burton,

1:34:25

Alice in Wonderland look. It's something else.

1:34:28

It's almost like more corporate. The

1:34:31

look of all these movies, you know, Am I 1 and

1:34:33

2, Cowboys and Aliens, Zathura, they

1:34:35

all have that certain kind of

1:34:38

sheen to them, you know? Stickyness.

1:34:42

A different kind of stickiness perhaps. Yeah,

1:34:44

he's not a very interesting filmmaker to

1:34:47

me. No, not at all. Being

1:34:49

a director is good. Chef was fine. Yeah, it was

1:34:51

okay. I didn't see Maid or,

1:34:53

where was the other one? Swingers.

1:34:56

Swingers. I feel

1:34:59

compelled to. I don't like

1:35:01

Elf. Yeah, I've never really

1:35:03

cared about Elf. Everyone loves Elf, but yeah,

1:35:06

I've never been a Will Ferrell guy myself.

1:35:08

Same. Yeah. It's

1:35:11

just not for me. I remember Zathura

1:35:13

being weird. John is

1:35:15

kind of a boring

1:35:17

director and

1:35:20

there's no reason to see a movie just because his name

1:35:22

is on it. Yeah,

1:35:25

for sure. Should we do one more here?

1:35:27

Yes. Kind of a funny one

1:35:29

we can end on here. From BilboScott8,

1:35:32

what are your thoughts on

1:35:34

James Cameron's usage of AI to remove film grain

1:35:36

from his recent 4K discs as well as his

1:35:38

response? Basically, he said, people who care about it

1:35:40

should touch grass, lol. Yes. So,

1:35:44

yeah, Zathura's going around. Yeah,

1:35:47

it's weird because he's like defending the decision but

1:35:49

then he's like, puts his hands up. Now,

1:35:52

you're a dumb nerd if you even care about

1:35:54

this. Go touch grass. What?

1:35:57

Yeah. I saw people even

1:35:59

respond. responding to that, like obviously I'm

1:36:01

on the fucking 4K Blu-ray subreddit. You

1:36:04

know, there's people responding like, okay, look, my

1:36:07

girlfriend who doesn't even know

1:36:09

what a UHD is, watched

1:36:12

this with me and said like, why

1:36:15

do their faces look so weird? Why is it? Right?

1:36:18

Yeah. Terminator 2 is infamous,

1:36:20

like one of the worst 4K

1:36:23

transfers ever. Yeah, yeah, it's been there for

1:36:25

a while. And so like consistently with all

1:36:27

of James Cameron's like older films, it seems

1:36:29

like if there's a 4K release of

1:36:31

his films, you should probably avoid it. Like

1:36:35

that's the general impression. The fact that he was

1:36:37

even asked about it in an interview means that

1:36:39

there's a fucking problem, right? How

1:36:42

crazy is that though? When his

1:36:44

whole like brand is the like

1:36:46

visual fidelity, like pushing that stuff.

1:36:48

Yeah. It's very weird. Yeah.

1:36:52

He's like pioneered these like

1:36:54

huge budget special effects movies.

1:36:58

He's all about like Avatar, you know, like they're

1:37:00

spending billions of dollars and they have to like

1:37:02

be the literally the biggest movie of the year

1:37:04

to like make a profit. Just

1:37:07

I don't know. I

1:37:12

don't know enough about the process

1:37:15

of restoring like

1:37:17

a 4K as in like going

1:37:19

to the original film or

1:37:21

negative and transferring that to like

1:37:23

a UHD with like

1:37:26

HDR or whatever you want to

1:37:29

put on it. I

1:37:32

would just argue like if

1:37:34

you can get it to look like the

1:37:37

original film print, that

1:37:40

would be the goal for me. That's

1:37:42

the idea. So like. That's what you

1:37:44

want. As soon as you have

1:37:47

this weird automated process, whether it's AI

1:37:49

or something else. If

1:37:51

you're if you're if you're making people

1:37:53

look like plastic when they shouldn't.

1:37:57

That's a problem, James, and

1:37:59

it's not about. people touching grass, it

1:38:02

seems like something you should probably care the

1:38:04

most about instead of getting weird and defensive

1:38:06

about. It's very weird to be dismissive like

1:38:09

that. It seems like something you should care

1:38:11

about. Has

1:38:13

he watched any of the 4K? Yeah,

1:38:15

have you seen them? It's so,

1:38:17

yeah, you've like dedicated your life to

1:38:20

this, like, why are you hand

1:38:22

waving that? It's so weird.

1:38:24

What? It's very weird, but I did

1:38:26

see they dropped the seed bearer title

1:38:29

from the new avatar, so that's massively

1:38:31

disappointing. It was going to be called the seed

1:38:34

bearer? It

1:38:37

used to be like referred to as like,

1:38:39

yep, the next one's going to be like

1:38:41

the seed bearer, also Avatar 3, the seed

1:38:43

bearer, something like that. So

1:38:46

that's very disappointing that that's gone because that's hilarious. I

1:38:48

thought it was going to be called Avatar 3, this

1:38:50

time there's fire in it. What's

1:38:53

that as well? That's the subtitle. Okay.

1:38:59

All right, thanks for questions. Yeah,

1:39:02

yeah, it's fine. You

1:39:05

got a wreck? Oh

1:39:07

yeah, it is my wreck. I do have a wreck. Someone

1:39:10

I've wanted to revisit for a while

1:39:12

because I think the conversation could be

1:39:14

interesting. I feel like I've been forced

1:39:16

with some of these recent, I

1:39:19

guess, appearances on interviews

1:39:22

online and one of those got me thinking about this

1:39:24

movie again, that being American Beauty,

1:39:27

Kevin Spacey. Sure, okay. Yeah, it's

1:39:29

been a long time for me.

1:39:31

I feel like that could be,

1:39:34

it's time. Yeah, I used to really love that movie back

1:39:37

in the early 2000s. It's been a long time.

1:39:41

All the stuff with Kevin Spacey's happened since. He's

1:39:43

on all these weird interviews going around. It's like

1:39:46

a, I don't know, an

1:39:48

interesting film to revisit, I feel like. Very

1:39:51

excited. Thank you. If

1:39:54

you would like to watch

1:39:56

American Beauty and not

1:39:58

get spoiled for it. directed

1:40:01

by Sam Mendes written by Ellen Ball starring

1:40:04

Kevin Spacey It's in

1:40:07

the IMDb top 250 at number 77 77

1:40:10

okay, yeah watch it before the next episode comes out

1:40:13

these episodes come out every two weeks You

1:40:15

can listen to them early Go

1:40:18

into sardonicast.com sign up for premium. It's

1:40:20

only $2 a month also patreon.com Slash

1:40:22

sardonicast same thing or go to

1:40:25

the YouTube members thing and you

1:40:27

just click join And

1:40:29

you can get them early support the show and We

1:40:34

still got to figure out our merch thing Oops

1:40:37

been busy. We got

1:40:39

a sardonicast highlights channel Subscribe

1:40:42

to that hit the bell hit the bell in the

1:40:44

regular channel, okay, and You

1:40:49

got your tickets for Romulus

1:40:54

I do nice. I'm ready all right. I'll buy

1:40:56

mine. I'm feeling I'm actually being good about it's

1:40:58

talking shit a few episodes ago I'm feeling

1:41:00

a bit better more curious, okay well

1:41:05

Maybe you're setting yourself up for disappointment True

1:41:08

we'll find out All

1:41:11

right, thanks for listening everybody. Thanks everyone.

1:41:13

Have a happy Shrek

1:41:15

5 or crispy. Oh

1:41:17

god stop it I Can't

1:41:21

I can't do it Stay

1:41:23

crispy over there shit all right.

1:41:26

Bye everybody

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features