Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
In popular memory and on the big screen, the First World War was fought in the mud
0:08
of northern France — or maybe in the skies above it. But what about the
0:12
war beyond the irreverently-nicknamed trenches? I’m Lucy, and in this episode
0:16
of Footnoting History, I’ll be looking at the non-Western fronts of World War One.
0:24
The ways in which the First World War was collectively and individually traumatic can hardly
0:29
be overstated. But although even the name by which we know it indicates the conflict’s global scale,
0:36
images of this world war tend to concentrate on the scarred landscapes of northwestern
0:41
Europe — sometimes even the same few miles of France and Belgium. In this podcast,
0:46
I’ll be taking a look at how the war was fought and remembered in other places, from the harbors
0:51
of East Africa to the fields of Eastern Europe. The scope of the conflict owed much to the fact
0:58
that it was an imperial war. The infamously narrow strips of blood and mud and metal on
1:08
the Western Front were fought over not only for their own sakes, but also very much for the sake
1:14
of which of the empires in the conflict would have the power to draw the maps of the future.
1:19
The war began in East Africa, in fact, before hostilities were joined in Europe,
1:24
with the British bombing of a German radio station in Dar-es-Salaam. The European powers were divided
1:30
between a reluctance to commit troops to the African front, and a still deeper reluctance
1:35
to let their rivals gain a more secure foothold in the lucrative continent. It was a German
1:41
invasion of what is now Mozambique that drove Portugal to abandon its position of neutrality.
1:47
White populations of distinct colonies tended to elide their differences at the call of empire.
1:54
Most of the campaigns themselves, however, were fought by non-white troops.
1:59
The monument to Askari troops in Nairobi boasts an inscription by Rudyard Kipling, which concludes:
2:07
“If you fight for your country, even if you die, your sons will remember your name.” It appears in
2:15
Swahili as well as English, and was tailored to appeal to a local rather than imperial sense of
2:20
legacy — it contrasts notably with the patriotic pieties of similar monuments erected in Britain
2:30
(“Dulce et decorum est,” etc.) But it also pinpoints a grim and obvious irony: while
2:37
many of the Askari troops were indeed fighting on the soil and in defense of their homeland,
2:43
they were fighting in a war between two exploitative foreign powers.
2:47
Kenyan scholar Lydia Waithira Muthuma has suggested that, since it preserves and heroizes
2:54
a political minority, it deserves more intentional conservation than has hitherto been accorded it.
3:00
In contrast with monuments affirming British imperial hegemony,
3:04
it instead commemorates the agency — however fraught — of a political minority.
3:10
I should take a moment to observe that African troops in colonial armies were not a novelty,
3:15
and voluntarily became career soldiers in order to escape enslavement or better their social status.
3:22
During the First World War, however, conscription would become the norm.
3:27
Over 1 million African soldiers and carriers were mobilized for the war; over 15% of those men died.
3:35
Some conscripts were enlisted as a form of forced labor; elsewhere, it was responded to as a matter
3:42
of honor: Alaafin Ladigbolu of Oyo, for instance, told the British at the outset of the war that he
3:50
could guarantee thirty thousand troops from among his people — and that the British
3:56
“should not treat this as an idle boast.” The experiences of these conscripts, especially,
4:02
would help to mobilize African nationalism as a political movement in the period between the wars.
4:09
The exploitation of African raw materials, taxation, and inflation all rose markedly during
4:15
the war, rendering the cost of imperialism both more acute, and more acutely visible,
4:22
in all-too-stark contrast with the rhetoric of duty and solidarity binding the colonies
4:28
to the nations at war. In Sénégal and French West Africa, the military collaboration — and
4:35
conscription — of African troops would be invoked in arguments for rights to French citizenship.
4:41
Surprising exactly no one, these were withheld, because imperialism is terrible like that.
4:47
Mobilization itself, at the outset of the war, had often been constructed as a moral duty of African,
4:54
rather than colonial patriotism; an editorial in The Nigerian Pioneer wrote that “The African is
5:02
taught from early childhood the duty we owe one to the other…. In times of sorrow and sadness he
5:10
shares in the grief of his neighbors. In times of distress and want he is taught to contribute
5:16
towards the relief of those affected.” The ways in which imperialist agendas affected
5:22
Africa during the First World War are particularly visible in Cameroon. A German possession since the
5:29
infamous Berlin Conference, Cameroon was ruled — ineffectively — by an Anglo-French coalition,
5:36
and finally divided between British and French forces in 1916.
5:41
The complexity of these imperial conflicts is indicated in part by the fact that Nigerian
5:46
and Indian troops formed a significant part of the British forces in the Cameroon campaigns.
5:52
Within Cameroon, certain tribes allied themselves with the German army
5:58
in hopes of preserving the status quo against violent and prolonged upheaval.
6:03
In the aftermath of the war, while colonial infrastructure became even more dense, the lack
6:09
of regard for African subjects — and the potential for African political self-determination — became,
6:15
increasingly, matters at the forefront of debate. Similar dynamics are visible at play in Arab
6:21
nations: in modern Saudi Arabia and Jordan, Egypt, and not least Iraq. Britain, France, and Germany
6:28
all sought alliance with the Ottoman Empire at the war’s outset, and scrambled to claim its former
6:33
territories in the aftermath. The independence of Iraq, to take but one example, was fostered by the
6:39
British as a way of protecting themselves from other imperial ambitions. During the war itself,
6:45
the so-called Middle Eastern campaigns commanded the largest geographic scope of any of the war’s
6:47
theaters. (So-called because they extended well into the Caucasus and Persia.) It is worth noting
6:56
that, during the war and its immediate aftermath, this did command a more proportional place
7:02
in collective consciousness. How World War One as it has been imagined has narrowed to
7:10
Flanders Fields could be a subject for a podcast in its own right. But in multiple theaters of war,
7:17
the conflicts of transnational empires inevitably created ethnically and religiously diverse armies.
7:24
The clashes of imperial armies could become the pretext for acting on local rivalries,
7:29
and attempting to establish local dominance.
7:32
Imperial actors themselves often portrayed the conflicts in these ancient landscapes
7:37
in positively apocalyptic terms. T.E. Lawrence (admittedly a figure whose loyalties were complex,
7:44
not to say ambivalent, in the extreme) recounted the mining of a German railway as follows:
7:51
“When the front driver of the second engine was on the bridge, I raised my hand to Salem. There
7:57
followed a terrific roar, and the line vanished from sight behind a spouting column of black dust
8:04
and smoke a hundred feet high and wide. Out of the darkness came shattering crashes and long,
8:11
loud metallic clangings of ripped steel, with many lumps of iron and plate;
8:17
while one entire wheel of a locomotive whirled up suddenly black out of the cloud against the sky,
8:24
and sailed musically over our heads to fall slowly and heavily into the desert behind.”
8:33
This sinister, lyrical passage reads almost like a creation in reverse.
8:39
Lawrence recounts the subsequent slaughter via machine gun almost dispassionately, but also
8:45
gives narrative space to the plundering which Bedouin troops viewed as their just reward, and
8:50
on the terror of the wounded, refugees, and women who — it turned out — had been traveling on the
8:56
train alongside its cargo of weapons and food and blankets, underneath its nests of machine guns.
9:03
It’s a story in which Lawrence himself appears as a sort of anti-hero, in which,
9:08
he seems to suggest, imperial rivalries must inevitably implicate and injure local populations.
9:16
The Ottoman Empire — nominally the highest religious authority for Sunni Muslims — called
9:21
a jihad against the British. It failed signally. Nationalism, rather than faith, proved to be the
9:28
most powerful animating spark within the failing empire’s territories — and, indeed, within those
9:34
of its powerful rivals. In India, imperial and national identities were negotiated in ways
9:40
remarkably diverse even for the subcontinent. While Indian soldiers fought in the Caucasus,
9:46
in Egypt, and as far away as France, domestic political interests coalesced around the questions
9:52
of what this service would mean for the men who undertook it, and what it should, or could mean,
9:58
for the relationship of the British Empire to its Indian subjects. India was, of course,
10:04
from the British perspective, the proverbial jewel in the crown — a geographical lynchpin, securing
10:11
their power against Russian and Ottoman rivalries. With the disintegration of Ottoman power, the path
10:17
to India lay open to Germany. This possibility was not a universally disturbing one. In Chota Nagpur,
10:25
the Kaiser was referred to as a father figure, a near-deity who would liberate India and its
10:31
peoples from the British yoke. Knowing the historical rapacity of the German empire,
10:37
this may strike us as shocking, even ludicrous. But it is not that the Indian populace was
10:43
credulous or naive; rather, in a society where most information was transmitted orally, rumor and
10:50
legend used news from the distant battlegrounds to construct a myth surrounding a desired liberator.
10:57
Ambivalence towards empire is also visible on Europe’s Eastern Front.
11:02
As both the Ottoman and the Austro-Hungarian empires came apart at the seams,
11:07
what exactly this meant for the people and lands of central Europe and Turkey
11:11
was up for debate. For Russia, too, this front was part of an imperial story — at least at the
11:18
outset, with newsreels recording Czar Nicholas II inspecting his troops. The Russian army unraveled
11:25
spectacularly, however; horrendous losses were suffered; retrenchment became so habitual that it
11:31
became known as the Great Retreat; many men just decided to go home. (If you’ve seen Dr. Zhivago,
11:38
you may have at least some idea of the sheer confusion involved in this.) In the Balkans
11:45
and elsewhere in Eastern Europe, borders were up for grabs and refugees were everywhere.
11:50
The ambivalence of local responses is reflected and refracted in contemporary cultures of memory
11:56
surrounding the First World War. Did the fighting represent the last gasp of a noble empire?
12:02
The birth of a new nation? A time of chaos best forgotten? Romania entered the war in
12:09
hopes of overthrowing the German empire — and almost succeeded; allegedly, at least,
12:16
the Kaiser reacted to the news by exclaiming “The war is over!” This was understood by Germany as
12:23
nothing less than a betrayal of alliance — a betrayal explained by German authors as due
12:29
to the pernicious influence of French culture — luxurious, elitist, and immoral — rather, than,
12:37
say, that of the Ottoman Empire. With no fewer than four empires in free fall,
12:43
Central and Eastern Europe became what one historian has called a “shatterzone.” Some
12:48
towns in what is now the Ukraine changed hands as many was twenty times. Joachim von Puttkaner has
12:55
wryly observed that the immediate legacy of the First World War in Eastern Europe
12:59
appears to be “a nearly impenetrable jungle of overlapping revolutions and national conflicts.”
13:07
Without the stable coalitions of the Western Front, the violence was still more chaotic,
13:12
and arguably more extreme. And with empires in crisis, decisions about tactics and administration
13:19
were often left to the armies themselves. The regional refugee crisis galvanized civilian
13:25
action and social engagement, in ways that accelerated the formation of national identities.
13:30
However, as nation-states struggled towards formation in the aftermath of empire,
13:35
ethnic tensions and ethnic violence rose sharply. Military occupation was the norm. The home front
13:41
and the battlefront, in many places, blurred to the point of being indistinguishable.
13:47
The attempts to recover from violence, and to forge new identities in its aftermath,
13:52
created troubled legacies — and, in contrast to the English-speaking world,
13:57
the conflict was never touted as the war to end all wars.
14:03
Obviously, this podcast has only begun to explore the complexities of how the First World War was
14:09
fought on multiple continents, as a conflict with global stakes. It has been my goal to
14:16
show at least some of the scope of how the war was fought and imagined — and by whom. It is,
14:22
obviously, a story dominated by imperial violence. But it is also a story of how,
14:28
even in the midst of war, new ways of forging identity and forming societies could be imagined.
14:38
this has been Footnoting History. If you like the podcast, be sure to visit our
14:41
website footnotinghistory.com where you can find links to further reading suggestions
14:45
related to this week's episode as well as a calendar of upcoming podcasts. You can also
14:50
like us on facebook and follow us on twitter at historyfootnote until next time remember
14:55
the best stories are always in the footnotes.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More