The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

Released Friday, 23rd October 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

The Future of Podcasting with Adam Curry

Friday, 23rd October 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It was 2005 2006 when I

0:00

got a call from Eddie Q, who was

0:06

pretty big man on campus there

0:06

now. Yeah. And he said that you

0:10

want to meet with Steve Jobs

0:10

like, Huh. So I went he was at

0:15

d3, the d3 conference. I went

0:15

had an hour just him and me. It

0:19

was really incredible. He was

0:19

very personable, of course, he

0:21

wanted something from me. He

0:21

wanted me to to bless podcasting

0:25

in iTunes, which he asked me I

0:25

said, Yeah, absolutely. In fact,

0:28

I'll give you the directory that

0:28

we have to get it started. And

0:31

that day, he announced

0:31

podcasting and iTunes.

0:38

Welcome back to Buzzcast.

0:38

I'm Kevin today. I've got Tom

0:41

with me. Travis is helping us on

0:41

the producer. And and we've got

0:44

a very special guest today. It

0:44

is Adam curry, the pod father of

0:47

podcasting. Thank you so much for joining us, Adam.

0:50

It's a great pleasure. And

0:50

I was actually very excited. I

0:54

had not seen the podcast you

0:54

guys do? I did see it. Where

0:59

does it show up? It showed up

0:59

somewhere like, okay, they got

1:02

they do a podcast for the

1:02

customers. That's kind of cool.

1:04

So I did see it, but I hadn't I

1:04

hadn't actually checked into it

1:07

yet.

1:07

Yeah, we use it for a lot

1:07

of example stuff. So you'll see

1:11

as we're adopting new tags and

1:11

stuff and working with the

1:13

podcast index, kind of the first

1:13

feed that we always hit stuff on

1:16

is this one. Which, you know,

1:16

for better or worse, sometimes

1:20

we mess up our stuff. But

1:22

I know the ceiling Believe

1:22

me, I know the ceiling. I've met

1:26

plenty of feed. Yeah.

1:28

So a lot of people who

1:28

listen to our show, and a lot of

1:31

people who are Buzzsprout

1:31

customers love podcasting, but

1:34

they're relatively new to it. So

1:34

they don't necessarily know the

1:37

whole 25 is it been 25 years or

1:37

20 years history? I don't even

1:41

know what 13 years 15 year

1:41

history of podcasting. And so

1:48

I'm sure you've told the story a

1:48

million times. But would you

1:51

mind telling it again, maybe the

1:51

the high level overview version

1:56

of the history of podcasting,

1:56

how did you get started, how did

1:58

this whole space come to into

1:58

existence?

2:01

Okay, I was living in

2:01

Amsterdam, I grew up in

2:05

Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and

2:05

then moved to a move back to the

2:09

States, I'm American, moved back

2:09

to the States, and eventually

2:12

wound up doing MTV etc. And then

2:12

I started, one of the first

2:17

internet advertising companies

2:17

called thinking was on ramp. And

2:21

then we took it public, and it

2:21

was thinking new ideas. And

2:24

after a couple year run on that,

2:24

it was time for me to leave, I

2:28

was just sitting around in suits

2:28

all day. And that was fun to

2:31

take a company public, that was

2:31

really a lot of fun. But I was

2:34

kind of like, Okay, I got to

2:34

find something else to do. And

2:38

so, my daughter been born in New

2:38

Jersey, and my wife was my wife

2:41

at the time was from the

2:41

Netherlands. So we decided to

2:45

move back and see what was going

2:45

on. And in the Netherlands, you

2:48

know, they are one of the first

2:48

countries to really have cable

2:52

to every single household for

2:52

cable television. So they were a

2:55

testbed for a lot of media

2:55

experiments. And because they

2:58

had this infrastructure, they

2:58

got cable modems very early on.

3:01

So in 99, everyone kind of had a

3:01

cable modem. And this was a

3:06

revolution because we had always

3:06

on internet, not that it was

3:10

fast. No, no, but you didn't

3:10

have to dial up. So no more. For

3:14

anyone who remembers that. You'd

3:14

have to dial up it was always on

3:17

but it was slow. And there was

3:17

really no the computers were

3:20

kind of ready for a multimedia

3:20

type experience. But the

3:23

bandwidth wasn't there. So we

3:23

had real audio and real video

3:27

and you know, nothing was really

3:27

great. And certainly if you hit

3:29

an mp3 or a quick time, then you

3:29

know, you do click on it, you

3:33

wait 10 minutes, and then you

3:33

you know, make a cup of coffee,

3:37

come back. Okay, it's done play

3:37

it. So I thought why not have

3:41

some kind of system and this

3:41

isn't 2001 it has some kind of

3:45

system that knows what I'm

3:45

looking for when it sees

3:48

something new then downloads it

3:48

but doesn't tell me until it's

3:52

there. So then you just kind of

3:52

removing that, that wait time

3:55

you just shifting it away to

3:55

some other space that you know

3:58

what I don't know, I can't hurt

3:58

me, I guess. And I had this idea

4:01

was walking around with a call

4:01

the last yard I wrote a piece on

4:05

a blog post on it. And at the

4:05

time, Dave Weiner was really

4:10

building out RSS. He had Radio

4:10

userland, which is a kind of a

4:14

cool app that worked as a server

4:14

on your on your lap on your

4:17

local computer. See the

4:17

interface was done completely

4:20

through a web browser, just

4:20

talking to the local server. And

4:25

it was a blogging tool. And one

4:25

of the first I think are the

4:28

earliest blogging tools. And it

4:28

also had an RSS aggregator in

4:31

it. And Funny enough, it was

4:31

called radio user land, which is

4:35

like okay, so I had my I've been

4:35

a radio guy all my life. So I

4:38

kind of had that radio idea. And

4:38

I thought, you know, wouldn't it

4:42

be cool if just like with what

4:42

RSS does where it kept, you

4:45

know, captures kind of the

4:45

stories you go back and read

4:47

them later. If we could put an

4:47

attachment, a file attachment

4:51

that would download and then it

4:51

will be ready for playing. And I

4:54

and I actually went to New York

4:54

and met with Dave and he I think

4:58

he had the first meeting. He was

4:58

like a VGA guy or whatever. But

5:04

I was pretty persistent, came

5:04

back the next day and showed him

5:06

in his software, my idea. And he

5:06

ultimately said, Okay, I'll

5:12

implement this. But under one

5:12

condition, you never ever use my

5:16

software again, because that was

5:16

horrible what you showed me So

5:19

okay, that's fine. That's good.

5:19

And the, the enclosure element

5:24

of RSS was born. And this kind

5:24

of meandered along, we were

5:28

using it between each other

5:28

sending 100 megabyte file, which

5:31

at the time was crazy big. And

5:31

then you know, the next morning,

5:35

I'd wake up because I was still

5:35

you know, to timezone. And oh,

5:38

there's a can play and I played

5:38

the video and it was okay, but

5:41

it didn't really catch any

5:41

traction for

5:44

it. It solved a problem that

5:44

wasn't quite there yet. But I

5:47

didn't know was there until I

5:47

saw my first iPod. And that's

5:50

when I went off radio. Because

5:50

the first iPod was that white

5:54

thing with the dial. It looks so

5:54

much like the Sony transistor

5:58

radio my grandmother gave me

5:58

when I was a kid, which I

6:01

listened to the basketball games

6:01

under my pillow. When I was six

6:04

or seven years old. Yeah, just

6:04

it was it right. Now, it's not a

6:08

jukebox, that's a radio receiver

6:08

and I then I put the two pieces

6:11

together. I said, Well, why

6:11

don't we find an mp3 file that's

6:18

attached to an RSS feed, and

6:18

then take that out, download it,

6:22

and actually built this an apple

6:22

script, which is take someone

6:25

who's really a developer and

6:25

take Apple script, you got like,

6:29

you know, you got like a mess on

6:29

your hands. But I was able to

6:31

make it work. And so it would

6:31

look for one fee, look for a new

6:35

enclosure, download it to the to

6:35

iTunes at the time, because you

6:40

still had to sync your your

6:40

iPod, it would trigger the sync

6:43

and then you pick it up and

6:43

you'd be right there, I would

6:45

say a playlist was created. That

6:45

was the name of the show. And

6:49

then the episode. And podcasting

6:49

was born. And I immediately

6:53

started doing a show called The

6:53

Daily source code, because I

6:56

knew that we needed radios, we

6:56

needed radios on the other side,

7:01

which really, today is become

7:01

the podcast app that you use to

7:06

listen to shows, very analogous

7:06

to what we're doing now. I would

7:09

talk about the developers who

7:09

are working on these pod

7:12

catchers, as we call them. And

7:12

we learned a lot of things. And

7:15

it's just crazy stuff. You know,

7:15

when you have a very minimal

7:19

modem connection, and you

7:19

subscribe to feed and starts to

7:21

download 50 episodes of

7:21

something, this is not a good.

7:25

So these are all things that we

7:25

learned in the very early days.

7:27

And it kind of kind of grew. And

7:27

then there was, yeah, it was

7:30

just like a wave of of stuff

7:30

start to happen, I think was the

7:34

BBC came to interview me. And

7:34

then it was off to the races and

7:38

everyone was calling. I was

7:38

like, Oh, what is going on here?

7:40

And it was 2006 I think

7:40

2005 2006 when I got a call from

7:49

Steve Jobs, and he said, Well,

7:49

actually was Eddie Q. Who was

7:52

pretty big man on campus there

7:52

now. Yeah. And he said that you

7:56

want to meet with Steve Jobs

7:56

like, Huh. So I went he was at

8:04

d3, the d3 conference. I went

8:04

had an hour just him and me. It

8:07

was really incredible. He was

8:07

very personable, of course, he

8:10

wanted something from me, he

8:10

wanted me to to bless podcasting

8:13

in iTunes, which he asked me I

8:13

said, Yeah, absolutely. In fact,

8:16

I'll give you the directory that

8:16

we have to get it started. And

8:20

that day he announced podcasting

8:20

in in iTunes is pretty funny

8:25

video, because, you know, he

8:25

plays a stick piece of my show

8:27

where I'm ragging on my Mac. And

8:27

so he knew exactly what he was

8:30

doing. Total show guy.

8:32

So you had a directory of

8:32

podcasts before apple?

8:36

Yeah, it was called iPod

8:36

or.org for a whole bunch of

8:39

reasons. And it was really a it

8:39

was kind of a fun way of doing

8:43

it. It was a distributed

8:43

directory based on opml. So you

8:46

know how you can have feeds in

8:46

an opml file. So we use the

8:50

include tag, so I had like the

8:50

top level, and did it by

8:53

geography. And you clicked on

8:53

Europe, and then it would open

8:56

up and there would be, you know,

8:56

the Netherlands, Belgium,

8:59

Germany, and we had different

8:59

people in each country

9:01

maintaining what podcast they

9:01

were finding what was out there.

9:04

So overnight, I could have my,

9:04

my software, walk this tree and

9:09

say, oh, pop, here's new stuff

9:09

that we found from somewhere all

9:12

over the world. Granted, when

9:12

Apple launched, the directory

9:17

was disappointing because it

9:17

highlighted NPR, PBS net and I

9:22

will say, Tony Khan, W GBH in

9:22

Boston. I mean, he was early

9:27

early on, he was a big believer,

9:27

he dragged NPR into podcasting

9:32

by the scruff of their neck. And

9:32

it was good programming of

9:35

course, but it wasn't quite the,

9:35

the free feel and people

9:39

experimenting that we've seen in

9:39

these podcasts that you know, we

9:43

didn't have any of this

9:43

equipment. We didn't have cool

9:45

things to connect to each other.

9:45

We We barely had Skype, I think

9:50

just yet it was just about has

9:50

Skype, maybe not even

9:54

Was there any resistance

9:54

from the old media, like radio

9:58

or anybody else did they did

9:58

they? see this as a as a threat?

10:01

Or did they just see it as a

10:01

side project is something

10:04

totally irrelevant to what they were doing,

10:06

you know, very similar to

10:06

when I was at MTV in the 80s.

10:11

And very early 90s, I'd

10:11

registered mtv.com because I

10:16

noticed before the web This was

10:16

I had a gopher server. I mean, I

10:20

was running a gopher server and

10:20

I had adam@mtv.com email

10:23

address. And I was using on the

10:23

air and I went to the to the

10:27

legal department, and I said,

10:27

the van Topher, who now I think,

10:30

is the CEO of the network. And I

10:30

said, Hey, man, I got this

10:35

mtv.com it's just me, I'm just

10:35

using it for me. Is that okay?

10:38

And his answer was, it's fine.

10:38

We've got the AOL keyword, we're

10:43

not.

10:46

That's very bad. AOL, keyword.

10:48

Yeah. So that was kind of

10:48

the vibe from the radio, guys,

10:51

you know, but also, this was

10:51

around the time blogging was

10:54

starting. So people were, you

10:54

know, Pooh poohing blogging. On

10:57

the one hand, it was great. On

10:57

the other hand, who, why do we

11:00

have to know what you have to

11:00

say about yourself? I mean, of

11:02

course, now, Twitter is Twitter.

11:02

Yeah, is exactly what that has

11:05

become. And so yeah, I started a

11:05

company and started a podcast

11:10

network, which I found is not a

11:10

good idea. You can't really

11:13

monetize the network as a whole

11:13

bunch of reasons for that. But

11:17

what is interesting as a side

11:17

note, because podcasting has

11:21

been around for a long time, but

11:21

it really the resurgence came

11:24

with cereal. And that was, you

11:24

know, came at a great time in

11:28

entertainment history, because

11:28

people had really gotten into

11:32

binge watching, thanks to

11:32

Netflix, etc. And so here was

11:36

something that was episodic. You

11:36

wanted to know what the next

11:39

episode was, but you couldn't

11:39

have it. And that was freaking

11:43

people out, wait a whole week.

11:43

Now, you could come in later and

11:46

catch up, and you can catch up

11:46

to where you know where it was,

11:48

which was also new. But this

11:48

episodic idea that really caught

11:52

storm, but we were doing, we

11:52

were doing all kinds of great

11:56

things with podcasting. intil.

11:56

And I had the pod show in San

12:02

Francisco, we had a competitor

12:02

coming up. And and we had heard

12:06

about this competitor, and they

12:06

had a whole flash interface. And

12:09

it was called Oto. And we were

12:09

just waiting for this thing to

12:12

launch and they never launched

12:12

like, it never happened. It was

12:15

really strange. But they they

12:15

launched something else. It was

12:19

a weird kind of service. And the

12:19

one thing we always struggled

12:22

with, certainly in the beginning

12:22

was explaining, subscribing to a

12:26

podcast that immediately made

12:26

people think it's costing me

12:29

money. It's like a magazine

12:29

subscription. And they had

12:32

something they called follow,

12:32

which I thought was a genius

12:35

idea. You have to know that odio

12:35

had pivoted and became Twitter.

12:40

So they took basically the

12:40

underpinnings of podcasting with

12:44

you know, RSS, and change this

12:44

subscribe to follow. And it just

12:50

took off and it went crazy. And

12:50

then you know, Facebook was

12:52

coming on the scene, then

12:52

YouTube came on the scene. So

12:56

you know, podcasting was a very,

12:56

very slow grower. throughout

13:01

those years when everything was

13:01

basically Oh, my God, look at

13:04

Twitter, look at the Twitter

13:04

fail. Well, was bigger news

13:07

than, than anything in

13:07

podcasting, it was just, you

13:10

know, it was it was a thing. So

13:10

it took quite a backseat for a

13:13

number of years.

13:17

I think the iPhone had to

13:17

play a big part in it too, when

13:19

the iPhone came out having the

13:19

podcast app, and just people

13:23

having access to that kind of

13:23

bandwidth on their phone to

13:26

listen, so you didn't have to,

13:26

you know, download it on your

13:29

computer and listen on a computer, but you're listening right there on your phone like

13:31

that. That made a big difference

13:34

in podcasting.

13:35

Right. And so this is

13:35

where I made a mistake, or where

13:39

I didn't realize my mistake, but

13:39

once you have, because I know we

13:44

didn't have the smartphone, we

13:44

were thinking mp3 players,

13:47

iPods, you know, and that was

13:47

kind of your your radio. But

13:50

with the iPhone, it switched.

13:50

Now the app became the radio.

13:55

And I'd never have I never had

13:55

to worry about radios throughout

13:59

my entire career. I needed a

13:59

transmitter I needed a

14:01

microphone, and I could do my

14:01

thing. radios have always been

14:06

there. You know, you can get

14:06

radios free in the mail. You

14:09

know, weather radio wind it up.

14:09

It's the radios are everywhere.

14:13

And they have no inherent value.

14:13

And no one's really put any, any

14:17

development into radios. You

14:17

know, it's like yeah, we went

14:20

from am to FM. We have digital

14:20

we have, you know, some like in

14:24

in Europe, mainly RDS. So you

14:24

can get some information flowing

14:28

through to your to your

14:28

receiver, no real innovation.

14:31

And when it comes to podcasting,

14:31

it truly is just the app. And

14:38

the app developers, of which

14:38

though many have come and gone

14:42

and some are doing strong and

14:42

most are struggling, have never

14:46

been part of any value flow.

14:46

It's just there's no money

14:49

running from an advertiser or

14:49

listener, anybody through an app

14:53

developer. So the radios are

14:53

drying up and what happens is

14:58

you get some couple of big And

14:58

they say, boom, we're Spotify.

15:03

Here's our radio, and Apple,

15:03

although they have been

15:06

fantastic stewards of podcasting

15:06

and have been very fair and

15:10

allowing complete access to

15:10

their will not complete but

15:14

enough access to their database,

15:14

they became the de facto

15:18

standard on the way in which we

15:18

don't know anything about, we

15:21

don't know how many things get

15:21

rejected. And once it's there,

15:26

love it or hate it. Alex Jones

15:26

has a right to say what he wants

15:28

to say. And if that and I

15:28

understand that might be a

15:31

problem for for Apple and their

15:31

customer base. That's okay. But

15:36

that's when I said, Okay, I'm

15:36

gonna take it back. Now, I want

15:40

to take the directory back, and

15:40

we're gonna put it in an

15:42

independent place. So I really

15:42

had two missions, one is

15:46

realizing that you just can't

15:46

have an entity that has any

15:52

other business line than being

15:52

the index, you can't have any

15:56

other business it has to be

15:56

that's its job. It can't be

15:59

stewarded or shepherded by

15:59

anybody who has anything else.

16:02

Certainly not when it comes to

16:02

advertising, because I'll make

16:05

my speech short. advertising is

16:05

censorship. That's just how it's

16:08

how it works. I've been in

16:08

commercial radio and television

16:11

for a long time. There's stuff

16:11

you can and can't say, when

16:15

there's advertising at play.

16:15

That's just the bottom line. So,

16:20

in order to preserve podcasting,

16:20

as a platform for free speech,

16:24

we needed an independent index.

16:24

And, wow, when it comes to the

16:29

actual act of free speech, it

16:29

doesn't get any better than

16:33

podcasting. That's what we do is

16:33

the true nature of free speech

16:38

distributed globally, that has

16:38

to be protected. And having done

16:42

my own show for coming up on our

16:42

13th anniversary with no agenda,

16:47

we have developed the value for

16:47

value model, which proves that

16:52

if you ask people to support

16:52

something they will, if you make

16:57

it frictionless enough, or if

16:57

you give them a reason to it's

17:00

more reason than anything,

17:00

people will support it. So I had

17:03

no doubt that we could start

17:03

podcasts index.org. With support

17:08

from the community. Thank you

17:08

very much to very generous

17:12

support we've seen from from

17:12

Buzzsprout. And I think that

17:16

we're kind of succeeding in that

17:16

mission. While there's been this

17:20

just as a sidetrack to this

17:20

because of the structure of

17:24

Apple, mainly. There's never

17:24

been a capability for

17:28

innovation. Everybody has ideas,

17:28

everybody knows what they want.

17:32

A lot of them agree. Some things

17:32

overlap. Some things I don't

17:36

think is anything where people

17:36

actually hate an idea so much,

17:39

they wouldn't want to see that

17:39

as an expansion of podcasting.

17:42

But everyone's kind of waiting

17:42

around for the big dog Apple to

17:45

say, Okay, we'll join in, we'll

17:45

do it. And then as we

17:48

progressed, Google came along.

17:48

And then Spotify. And I Heart

17:53

Radio bought bought Stitcher, I

17:53

think or or Gosh, maybe it's

17:57

Sirius XM. And they're all

17:57

building these little silos. So

18:02

where's my core problem is, I

18:02

need to incentivize guys who

18:06

know how to make radios into

18:06

making the next generation of

18:10

radio, what is the next podcast

18:10

experience from a listener or

18:15

viewer standpoint? Can I back

18:15

you up real quick? Yeah.

18:18

You mentioned just

18:18

briefly, the the idea that Apple

18:21

who have been great stewards to

18:21

the podcast community, they have

18:26

provided access, and as you

18:26

said, not total access, but

18:29

enough access to their

18:29

directory. Now, you're starting

18:33

the podcast index, can you go

18:33

into a little bit more of the

18:36

why that's important. I feel

18:36

like that is it's critical for

18:41

all of us as podcasters and

18:41

podcast fans to understand the

18:46

amount of power that Apple had

18:46

in being the default directory

18:51

for almost every third party

18:51

podcasting app,

18:54

right? Sure. As it turns

18:54

out, making a podcast app is

18:58

hard work. It's not just a nice

18:58

little, you know, player thingy

19:03

and a list thing and a click

19:03

here thing and subscribe, and

19:07

Ooh, it's all great. And then I

19:07

can focus on features like 1.1

19:11

to speed 1.5 speed, fast

19:11

forward, you know, all these

19:15

different things, you actually

19:15

have to do a lot of work in the

19:19

background, even if you're

19:19

working off of Apple's system,

19:23

there's still a lot of work to

19:23

get it the way you want to build

19:26

your app, your your radio

19:26

receiver. And so most of the

19:31

smaller podcast apps, we're all

19:31

tying into Apple's database

19:35

because you it really takes a

19:35

lot of horsepower and hands on

19:39

management to keep a million and

19:39

a half podcast feeds sorted, you

19:44

know, updated, and just you

19:44

know, that it's, it's much

19:47

bigger than it seemed it's not

19:47

unmanageable. It's not Google

19:50

level stuff, but it is it's

19:50

quite a bit for an independent

19:53

developer who has to have, you

19:53

know, many machines running

19:56

databases, etc. So with that in

19:56

place, Went Apple removed a

20:01

podcast that went like dominoes

20:01

all the way down the line. It's

20:05

like, Oh, no, you can't get that

20:05

podcast on any of these apps, or

20:08

most of them, right. And that's

20:08

the problem that it's it's like,

20:13

you have a transmitter but

20:13

someone's deflecting the beam,

20:16

you know, and that is the reason

20:16

why podcasting has not been

20:21

super successful with

20:21

advertising the way YouTube has,

20:24

is because it's distributed

20:24

because it doesn't belong to one

20:27

single company. And, and it's,

20:27

in my mind, when that when my

20:34

friend Joe Rogan went to

20:34

Spotify. That's a part of the

20:37

story. Because I know that

20:37

that's going to, you know,

20:41

Spotify is paying for him to

20:41

take his audience over to

20:44

Spotify. And hopefully, what

20:44

they hope is that they will then

20:49

change their podcast listening

20:49

behavior to using Spotify,

20:53

because they believe that almost

20:53

everything is on Spotify, and

20:56

quite a lot is not everything,

20:56

but quite a lot. That leaves a

21:00

vacuum, a super vacuum for

21:00

people who have who make podcast

21:05

apps. Because now one of the

21:05

reasons that eight or 10 million

21:09

people had to use their app to

21:09

listen to the Joe Rogan podcast

21:12

just went away to the

21:12

competition, one step over on

21:16

your screen, and that Spotify,

21:16

that's that sucks. So I need to

21:20

first of all ensure that the

21:20

next five Joe Rogan's who are

21:24

outside of the Spotify place,

21:24

and they're already born, Joe

21:28

said himself, they're here

21:28

today, they have the same reach

21:32

that they can have the same

21:32

great reach amongst audiences.

21:36

And also independent apps, just

21:36

podcast apps that people love

21:40

their podcast apps, they get

21:40

very wedded to them. And that we

21:44

don't want to end up in a

21:44

scenario where if you want to

21:47

listen to the shows, you like to

21:47

listen to that it's like the

21:51

television experience, which I

21:51

think is already an outdated

21:55

model. And that's why I go to

21:55

Netflix for this, I had Hulu for

21:59

this, I got to Amazon for this,

21:59

I got Disney plus for that I got

22:03

Oh Disney for that I got Apple

22:03

plus for this. And then at the

22:06

end of the day, you wake up you

22:06

go, I got $250 worth of

22:09

subscriptions to watch, you

22:09

know, eight shows, this is this

22:13

is too much. So and and that's

22:13

the second part that I'm working

22:18

on is retooling podcasting as a

22:18

platform of value. So that we

22:22

can operate in a, I think a

22:22

postmodern structure where

22:27

everybody can make money,

22:27

including, and maybe most

22:30

importantly, the people who

22:30

bring it to you, namely the app

22:34

developer. So I was adamant that

22:34

whatever we come up with, that

22:38

has to be a part of part of the

22:38

value flow.

22:44

Let me ask a question.

22:44

Because when the deal went down

22:46

with Joe Rogan, it's something

22:46

we talked about on Buzzcast was

22:48

just how Hey, podcasters, we

22:48

need to pay attention to what's

22:52

happening in the industry. And

22:52

we took our podcasts off of

22:58

Spotify, because we were

22:58

concerned about what we saw

23:01

going on in the industry. But

23:01

the feedback that we got was

23:03

overwhelming from from

23:03

independent podcasters. They

23:06

didn't understand what the big

23:06

deal was. They said, hey, look,

23:09

this, this is great for

23:09

everybody. If Joe Rogan's

23:12

getting this massive payout to

23:12

go to Spotify. Why is that a bad

23:15

thing for podcasters? Or for

23:15

podcasting? And so can you maybe

23:20

back up in kind of frame that

23:20

from to answer that question of

23:25

why is that? Why is that a bad

23:25

thing? Because if I'm on

23:28

Spotify, that's more people that

23:28

are listening to my podcast,

23:30

why? Why would I be concerned

23:30

with that?

23:34

Without fail, even what

23:34

you send up to Apple to get

23:37

included there. But certainly,

23:37

with Google, Amazon and Spotify,

23:44

you sign a contract. And the

23:44

Spotify contract is fantastic.

23:48

It says by clicking here, you

23:48

agree to give to us now having a

23:53

full license, paid in full, you

23:53

get nothing but so that's it

23:58

paid in full zero dollars. And

23:58

we can do anything we want. And

24:03

we can cut it up edit it, we can

24:03

make new shows out of it. If we

24:07

want to we can do whatever we

24:07

want. And no, no, that's just a

24:10

hard No. And people don't read.

24:10

So like, Oh, clickety Click

24:15

good. It's all good. I'm in and

24:15

you know, they give some leeway.

24:18

Or if you already have a host, a

24:18

host read. That's okay. Well,

24:22

we'll see how long that lasts.

24:22

But ultimately, they're now

24:25

doing pre rolls to pre rolls and

24:25

mid rolls. So you get

24:28

advertising in front of your

24:28

show. Not all of them, but some

24:31

will have them in the middle of

24:31

the show. And I don't know, it

24:35

depends for everybody. I

24:35

personally, I like ownership of

24:39

what I do and what I do with my

24:39

partners. You know, I mean, I'd

24:42

never put it up on Spotify To

24:42

start with, you know, those like

24:45

some eat, you know, they spam

24:45

every podcast or Hey, put your

24:49

stuff in a, you know, on the

24:49

Spotify. So I go take a look. So

24:53

it's already there, but it's not

24:53

in my account. So I said How is

24:55

this possible? And then they

24:55

sent me to some website that

24:59

said For a content, legal

24:59

copyright claim, well, I'll do

25:03

no such thing. See you, I'm not

25:03

gonna get into a legal argument

25:07

with you, I'm not gonna go

25:07

through this form and sign

25:10

anything. And two days later,

25:10

they took it off. And I think

25:13

that's because they're rolling

25:13

out the ads. And they know that

25:16

if they had that there without

25:16

my signature, that they were in

25:18

violation. So they purge that,

25:18

and I was quite happy. So I

25:21

didn't have to go through any,

25:21

any process. I also am not so

25:27

sure that Spotify as a podcast

25:27

platform is going to be that

25:31

successful. The reason I think

25:31

that is the people who have been

25:37

enjoying podcasts, probably a

25:37

different from the people who

25:41

use Spotify, when I'm in the

25:41

car, or when I'm roving around

25:45

or doing the dishes, whatever

25:45

my, my secondary thing is that

25:49

I'm doing while I'm enjoying

25:49

something on my ears. It's

25:54

podcast, it's not music, I and

25:54

so I'm just not really a music

25:57

guy. If I want some Spotify for

25:57

dinner, or in the evening, or

26:02

you know, and then I'll put it

26:02

on, but I'm more of a podcast

26:05

person, I believe people,

26:05

there's two different kinds of

26:07

people. And the people who were

26:07

listening to podcasts elsewhere

26:10

may stick with that experience,

26:10

because it is an experience. If

26:13

you using overcast it's very

26:13

different from Spotify. In many

26:17

ways. Spotify may catch up, I

26:17

don't know. But I also know some

26:21

of the numbers. The Michelle

26:21

Obama podcast, which was

26:24

purchased, you know, in the Joe

26:24

Rogan like deal I don't think

26:27

for the same amount of money but

26:27

for a lot. And they launched

26:31

with two sponsors with actually

26:31

was Procter and Gamble. So

26:34

they've tied and Donnie at dawn,

26:34

tide and Dawn, and I had heard

26:40

that there was very low

26:40

listenership. And I heard it

26:43

about three days before Spotify

26:43

announced, Wow, this is so

26:48

great. We're gonna put it on all

26:48

platforms. a cry for help

26:53

saying, Oh, crap, we can't

26:53

deliver the audience. We sold

26:57

this to the sponsors for so they

26:57

have a problem delivering the

27:01

audience. They may have the

27:01

audience, you can get it you can

27:04

by Joe Rogan's audience will

27:04

they stick around and listen to

27:06

other podcasts on that platform?

27:06

I think this left to prove

27:09

themselves. So I'm not so sure.

27:09

But to answer your question, the

27:12

long roundabout way, I have been

27:12

independent, I have not had to

27:17

adhere to anyone except my

27:17

partner, john C. Dvorak, or no

27:20

agenda, all my others face,

27:20

whatever I want to do. No one

27:24

can can take me off, no one can

27:24

remove my feed. It's just as far

27:28

as I'm concerned. Spotify radio,

27:28

said it's you know, and they

27:34

want to charge me you know, or

27:34

not basically charge me by

27:37

saying we own this. We can do

27:37

whatever we want until you don't

27:40

like it anymore. What was okay,

27:40

I don't like it. No.

27:43

Now, you did say that

27:43

you're not a music guy. And I

27:47

just want to back up to the MTV

27:47

days. Did that ruin it for you?

27:52

Kevin and I, Kevin and I were

27:52

talking about before before we

27:55

got together, like I remember.

27:55

Headbangers ball. Like, I

28:00

remember setting up the VCR to

28:00

record at my friend's house

28:03

because I didn't even have MTV.

28:03

And I'd have to go get the

28:05

recording, to go watch it. And

28:05

Kevin goes, you just wonder

28:08

like, I wonder if he even like

28:08

the music that he was listening

28:11

to? Or if he just had to like

28:11

that was just the job. They gave

28:14

him?

28:14

A good question. So first

28:14

of all, I lived inside the hits,

28:18

you know, the 80s and 90s hits

28:18

for a long time, and I

28:22

definitely got burned out on it.

28:22

Yeah, and, and because of the

28:25

radio stuff. I know every single

28:25

song I know the intro. I know

28:29

when the vocal start. I can't

28:29

sing any of the lyrics because

28:32

I'm always queuing up another

28:32

record. So I know how it ends.

28:36

Not yours ball was I really

28:36

liked it for a number of

28:39

reasons. One, it was something

28:39

that I looked the part so you

28:42

know, I just had to throw on a

28:42

leather jacket. But what I found

28:45

out really quick is this is top

28:45

and most metal and certainly

28:51

stuff we played is top notch

28:51

musicianship I mean really,

28:55

really good. Like classically

28:55

trained good. And and that I

29:00

always got off on that. And I

29:00

love that and whenever we had

29:03

guys coming by, of course, you'd

29:03

have the beat cage no one is

29:06

zonked out or crazy or whatever,

29:06

that's part of the World

29:10

Wrestling idea of metal and

29:10

Headbangers ball, but most of

29:14

these guys and gals were real.

29:14

And I always enjoyed that. And

29:18

when I when they understood that

29:18

I understood the music and, and

29:21

the composition. And I do know a

29:21

lot about that. We found each

29:26

other immediately and I had no

29:26

problem listening to metal, or

29:30

most of this. In fact, what I

29:30

hated about Headbangers ball is

29:33

that because of MTV being afraid

29:33

of alienating people, every

29:37

third video was Bon Jovi. You

29:37

know. It's like, Okay, so that

29:46

was kind of lame, you know, you

29:46

can't be you know, having

29:49

Metallica and then Bon Jovi

29:49

after that. It makes sense. But,

29:54

you know, for the, whatever

29:54

their reasons were, that's

29:57

that's how they did that. So and

29:57

I actually I took around about

30:01

way after, when I got more into

30:01

one of the internet after I left

30:05

MTV, I started listening to a

30:05

lot classical kind of detox just

30:10

from everything. And I moved to,

30:10

I moved to Texas, I really got,

30:16

you know, I really got into

30:16

country, modern country. And by

30:19

the way, it's a lot of the guys

30:19

from the hair bands in the 80s,

30:22

who are playing that drums and

30:22

bass and guitar for some of the,

30:25

you know, for some of the big

30:25

country guys, so I love

30:28

listening to to talk, whatever

30:28

it is I can, I can probably

30:31

listen for a while.

30:32

So I think we had a good

30:32

conversation about the idea of

30:36

open versus platform, right. And

30:36

the the downsides to the

30:41

platform is control, you got to

30:41

play by their rules, they could

30:44

pull the plug on you at any

30:44

second, you're building whatever

30:47

you're building in somebody

30:47

else's, you know, playground,

30:49

right, right. But there's also

30:49

benefits to platforms. And some

30:56

of those benefits are like, the

30:56

ability for a platform to

31:01

improve the listener experience.

31:01

Like if they control everything

31:04

kind of soup to nuts, right?

31:04

Like, that's an easy task for

31:07

them, or discoverability. So

31:07

you're already listening to

31:10

this, hey, and we know all this

31:10

stuff about you, because you

31:13

signed up and gave us your credit card and told us where you live and told us how old you

31:15

are. So you're probably gonna

31:17

like this too. Like, they can

31:17

help recommend things and

31:20

building those algorithms, building those listener experiences. That's if we want

31:22

open if we don't want people to

31:27

go to platforms, that's what we

31:27

have to compete with. Right?

31:30

Like, that's why YouTube is

31:30

winning the video space, right?

31:33

Because they've created a great

31:33

environment to be able to

31:36

discover and find and enjoy

31:36

video content. So how do we do

31:40

that in the podcasting space,

31:40

and, you know, kind of leading

31:43

into this discussion that I want

31:43

to have about these these new

31:46

namespace tags that we're

31:46

developing? Because I think

31:49

that's what we're trying to bite

31:49

off is how do we improve the

31:52

listening experience? How do we

31:52

bring some of these technologies

31:56

that traditionally have only

31:56

been developed in platforms, but

31:59

we can do them in the open space

31:59

if we all work together?

32:02

Okay, so here's my

32:02

experience over the past 15,

32:06

almost 20 years, is that

32:06

podcasting is typically long

32:11

form it you know, rarely Is it a

32:11

five minute 10 minute podcast,

32:15

of course, they exist. Lots of

32:15

people enjoy them, half hour

32:18

shows, but I think they're in

32:18

general a little bit more long

32:21

form than your typical YouTube

32:21

video. And so I don't think a

32:27

recommendation engine I see, you

32:27

know, Apple is working on it.

32:31

And Spotify is working on it.

32:31

Yeah. Okay, you know, but you

32:34

it's not It's same thing to

32:34

sample a podcast, versus a

32:40

YouTube video. And YouTube is

32:40

pretty well defined what that

32:44

format is, in general, just for

32:44

the Quick Hits, and you know,

32:48

and yes, when you're in a

32:48

YouTube hole, and you're looking

32:52

at cat videos, you want more cat

32:52

videos, that you know, a podcast

32:56

is, it's just a whole different

32:56

animal. And I find the

32:59

recommendations. And we've never

32:59

advertised, never, never done

33:03

any of that is mouth to mouth.

33:03

Well, we really turned it around

33:07

from the get go. We said you,

33:07

our audience, you're not

33:09

listening to your producers, so

33:09

you better start producing. That

33:11

means you to send this money and you need to send this information and we need to be

33:13

able to rely on you. And if you

33:16

have expertise, so we've made it

33:16

unlike radio where the only feet

33:21

Well, I come from radio when you

33:21

get mail. I mean, I had an MTV,

33:24

even I had mailbags mail bags

33:24

full in my dressing room. Now,

33:29

that was the feedback loop. And

33:29

then, you know, on radio, we had

33:32

the telephone, but it was kind

33:32

of like, hey, you're calling

33:34

100? What's your name? shanique.

33:34

What's unique? Are you calling

33:36

from Brooklyn, but you're

33:36

calling 100? You know, that's

33:40

kind of the that's kind of it.

33:40

And maybe you troll the phone

33:42

lines during a song and talk to

33:42

some listeners. There's really

33:45

no, there's not really No, no

33:45

feedback engine. And now I think

33:50

for YouTube, you see, you know,

33:50

comments is, is a big place for

33:54

that immediate feedback, by the

33:54

way of which the people who make

33:57

those videos Oh, nothing. That's

33:57

all Google alphabet, YouTube,

34:01

they own that all. I mean, how

34:01

many times you like oh, this

34:04

would be a cool video and it's

34:04

gone taken down remove by user

34:08

doesn't exist violated Terms of

34:08

Service, the experience is

34:11

getting worse. And that nothing

34:11

really little to do with

34:15

political bias. It's not brand

34:15

friendly. advertising is

34:18

censorship. So with with

34:18

podcasts, it's really the tribe

34:23

that you build, and the tribe

34:23

around you. And it doesn't, what

34:27

I've learned is it doesn't

34:27

matter how small or how big that

34:29

tribe is, if you could

34:29

communicate with him and you

34:32

give them enough ways to talk to

34:32

you sure, email short. You can

34:35

have forums, comments, whatever,

34:35

we have a chat, which we call

34:40

the troll room, but we have many

34:40

ways for people to feedback we

34:43

and we also gave away all our

34:43

data, everything we have, we

34:47

have for search engines. We

34:47

have, you know, just

34:50

unbelievable amounts of

34:50

promotional sites that do

34:52

something specific for the show

34:52

about the show, all put together

34:56

by our producers, our audience

34:56

and it is is a totally different

35:01

beast. I don't think it can be

35:01

recreated in any manner like

35:05

that in any other medium is very

35:05

specific to podcasting. And that

35:09

format of programming that it's

35:09

to me it's I think we'll see

35:14

better things coming from the

35:14

podcast apps to help. An a

35:19

podcast app also has an

35:19

audience. They you know, they

35:23

have an identity. It's not

35:23

shining right now. But why

35:28

wouldn't a podcast app be able

35:28

to do deals with a podcaster and

35:34

promote their podcast? Yeah,

35:34

this is free market. None of

35:39

that is enabled. And now comes

35:39

in the namespace and the

35:44

expansion that we're putting in

35:44

place, we're podcasting. And

35:47

what we when Dave and I start,

35:47

Dave Jones, and I started on

35:50

this journey. We said, let's

35:50

just see what everybody wants.

35:55

And let's not have a big meeting

35:55

about it, we'll put into the

35:58

document, which, as you know,

35:58

all of a sudden, smart people

36:02

show up and know how to write

36:02

the document and put it in the

36:05

right format. And everyone's

36:05

collaborative. And, and it turns

36:08

out, there's really no issue.

36:08

The only thing is Apple's not in

36:12

the conversation, or Spotify is

36:12

not in the conversation. Well,

36:14

they clearly don't care about

36:14

us. So why don't we make our own

36:19

space the way we want it to be

36:19

and what I've seen from captions

36:23

to transcripts to ratings to, I

36:23

mean, goes the list goes on and

36:27

on. All these things are great,

36:27

and everyone has one or two

36:31

specific ideas they want to

36:31

implement. Well, let's put it

36:34

all in. And if you have

36:34

something working, you're

36:37

definitely in, it's good to go.

36:37

Because this is going to create

36:41

a Spotify as a podcast

36:41

experience is boring. It's

36:46

boring. It's the same crap we've

36:46

seen for 1015. New what's an

36:51

inbox? You know, now I got a pod

36:51

friender, where you can swipe

36:55

left and swipe right. This is

36:55

it. That's a that's a funny app.

37:00

Like, um, you know, it's like

37:00

just, I'm looking at I'm

37:03

scanning podcast the way I

37:03

would, why not anymore. But the

37:06

way I might have back in the day

37:06

on Tinder, you know, there's

37:09

cast coverage, which is a whole

37:09

different discovery mechanism by

37:14

itself. But I've seen guys who

37:14

are working on chats that will

37:18

incorporate the podcast, I mean,

37:18

this Finally, we have been able

37:22

to open it up and it feels to me

37:22

I just see this, this flood this

37:26

rush of, of a decade of pent up

37:26

creativity and ideas and

37:33

frustration. is just like spewing out

37:35

everywhere. We've been doing

37:37

this for a month. Look at what's

37:37

happened. I mean, we've got a

37:41

lot of you guys, we got a

37:41

blueberry from the hosting side.

37:45

Was it? fireside FM

37:47

fireside? Yeah. And the

37:47

captivate guys came in there to

37:52

modify can say they show a

37:52

lot of seeds. But Where's it

37:55

coming from? It's coming from

37:55

guys like you. And that's where

37:59

the innovation is going to come

37:59

from. And we have a front row?

38:03

Well, I can tell you we've

38:03

been we've been excited when we

38:05

found out about podcast index,

38:05

like you said it was a there was

38:10

a lot of pent up ideas, we had

38:10

tons of ideas, things that we

38:13

would want to be able to bring

38:13

to the podcaster listener

38:17

experience like what Kevin was

38:17

talking about. And we don't we

38:22

as as a host can't do it, we

38:22

have to do it in partnership

38:25

with other hosts, and with with

38:25

players with the people that are

38:29

actually going to be playing the

38:29

podcast. And so what you've done

38:32

for us, and the reason that we

38:32

are big supporters, big

38:36

supporters in our time, our

38:36

treasure exactly like what

38:39

you've talked about, the reason

38:39

that we are we we had that

38:41

mentality is because we see the

38:41

opportunity there to rapidly

38:45

innovate faster than any one

38:45

company can do by doing it

38:50

together. And so I'm really

38:50

thankful to you for putting a

38:54

group together and excited, you

38:54

know, to be able to play a part.

38:58

Well, thank you. The thing

38:58

is, is that I, first of all, I'm

39:03

correcting a mistake. I had no

39:03

idea. I didn't understand the

39:07

mistake I made, but I think I

39:07

went through it. It's like I

39:09

never thought about the radio

39:09

side of it. Also never really

39:12

thought about the actual

39:12

transmitter tower side. That

39:15

will be an example of you guys.

39:15

You know, depending on what

39:19

metaphor you look at, or what

39:19

model because it can vary and

39:22

can interchange. And I think

39:22

that a lot of people have tried

39:26

very hard to get these things

39:26

done. And to be blunt about it.

39:31

All we really saw were groups

39:31

and boards and governors and all

39:37

kinds of official titles and

39:37

fundraising and and I like and

39:42

Dave Jones, who I've been

39:42

working with for 10 years on

39:45

we've been we've created so many

39:45

cool things that that no more

39:48

than eight people use. And we've

39:48

only met once in our life, but

39:52

we've had this great

39:52

relationship and it usually goes

39:55

like this. Hey Dave. Dave got a

39:55

great idea like okay, what are

39:58

we doing? And then you know, and

39:58

then we In two days, like, Okay,

40:01

I got to work and what is it and

40:01

they're like, Oh, this is cool.

40:03

And then I wind up using it for

40:03

myself who use it for self and

40:06

it goes nowhere. But when I saw

40:06

Joe leaving to go into, you

40:11

know, to go into Spotify, and I

40:11

saw what was potentially

40:15

happening with Apple as the

40:15

mothership, I said, Dave, we

40:19

have 10 years of aggregation

40:19

experience, we know how all of

40:23

this stuff works. We know how

40:23

gnarly it can be. Let's just

40:27

let's just put this together.

40:27

And then let's just wait for

40:30

people to show up. And whatever

40:30

they want, will do. And the only

40:35

reason I think that we are

40:35

getting away with it is because

40:40

of who I am. Not I don't have

40:40

any skill really, you know, it's

40:44

like Dave Jones is really doing

40:44

everything he can. And he's

40:48

educating me as much as I

40:48

educate him probably a little

40:51

more, for some reasons, like

40:51

there's not going to be on the

40:53

pod father, so great. So no one

40:53

really saw me in public. So

40:57

let's just run, run, run, run

40:57

run before they catch up, you

41:00

know. And I think it's the

41:00

Spirit. And that's what I see

41:03

with Todd and blueberry. That's

41:03

what I see with you guys. That's

41:06

what I see with Martin from

41:06

Denmark, who showed up and

41:10

listen, because of course, we do

41:10

podcasts in 2.0 podcast about

41:14

what we're doing the same thing

41:14

we did 15 years ago. And he's

41:17

listening. I'm like, yeah, we

41:17

should have a web app,

41:20

progressive web app, well, boom,

41:20

there it is. become this hive

41:24

mind of, and we have people who

41:24

are experts in database, which

41:28

Dave is fantastic, but we didn't

41:28

know everything. This stuff's

41:31

religion. So people really

41:31

collaborating. And I've seen it

41:36

happen so many times with open

41:36

source software development is

41:39

really beautiful. And people

41:39

coalesce and it's, it's just as

41:44

much science as it is art. You

41:44

can get to code in so many ways.

41:48

And I'm not a coder, but I can

41:48

see it and I understand it. And

41:51

I and I actually do see beauty

41:51

in it. But this, there never was

41:55

a political agenda because

41:55

podcasts index is there for one

42:00

reason only. It is to preserve

42:00

podcasting as a platform for

42:06

free speech, I hope to bring

42:06

personal stuff into that and

42:13

offer many more things of value.

42:13

That would be valuable for

42:17

everybody. And you will see if

42:17

it works, it's it doesn't really

42:20

matter. Because ultimately,

42:20

podcasts index or just has to

42:24

run by itself. I find it

42:24

refreshing and very exciting.

42:27

I'm 56. And not a lot of people

42:27

get a chance to do something

42:32

again, in the mid 50s. So I'm

42:32

super excited about.

42:39

And I can't I can't believe it's only been a month. I mean, we have three tags that

42:40

are like namespace tags that are

42:44

completely accepted, formalized

42:44

and have support for at least

42:48

one or more apps in the space.

42:48

So we have transcript tag, which

42:50

is supported by Buzzsprout,

42:50

podcast addict pad for pod

42:53

friend in pod news, the lock

42:53

tag, which helps prevent piracy,

42:58

podcast piracy, and we really

42:58

need anchor to jump on board

43:00

with this one. But so far, it's

43:00

been Buzzsprout pod news podcast

43:03

index, and I thought I saw

43:03

somebody else today. Didn't

43:06

fireside say they were gonna do

43:06

it. fireside is coming out too.

43:10

And then we have funding.

43:12

Well, what I like about

43:12

it, because obviously the honor

43:14

system and this is not like,

43:14

it's like some Gestapo comes

43:17

down from the digital heavens in

43:17

a rescue if you import a feed

43:22

that has a block to tag enabled

43:22

in it. But it does allow us to,

43:26

you know, someone whose feed has

43:26

been imported into an anchor to

43:31

say, Excuse me, I see this over

43:31

here, this blocked I mean, we're

43:34

basically we're giving them an

43:34

out. Yeah, right. to anchor the

43:39

thing. marginally deserved,

43:41

I feel like we solve their problem,

43:43

we solve their problem

43:43

will support this, you know, so

43:46

anyone who comes along, you

43:46

know, all you have to do is just

43:49

reject it. It's easy, and it'll

43:49

save them so much aggravation,

43:53

human extra human resources. So

43:53

they'll do it, I'm sure they'll

43:56

come around. Otherwise, you

43:56

know, if someone is importing

43:59

your feed, you say, look, here

43:59

it is. It's got the lock tag, I

44:02

see you don't support it. But

44:02

clearly, that's telling you

44:05

something, and it's a starting

44:05

point, instead of just Hey, hey,

44:09

I think that's mine. And let me

44:09

prove it to you.

44:12

Let me ask you this,

44:12

because I know I don't know if

44:14

we're gonna have enough time to

44:14

get into monetization too much.

44:18

But I wonder you know, you've

44:18

you've been around the internet

44:21

for a long time, right? You

44:21

remember when internet met free,

44:26

anything on the internet was

44:26

free. If a book is on the

44:28

internet, it must be free. It's totally legal for me to go download and do whatever music

44:30

if it's on the internet must be

44:32

free. I can just download it.

44:32

It's for me, right? If it's if

44:34

it's on the internet, it's free.

44:34

And that mentality continues

44:39

today. of everything being free,

44:39

whether it's Oh, yeah, Facebook

44:43

doesn't cost me anything. When

44:43

now we're starting to learn that

44:46

it does cost us something. And I

44:46

feel like this kind of relates

44:50

to your value for value. It's

44:50

recognizing if something has

44:54

value, you're paying for it one

44:54

way or the other. Right? Like

44:58

there is a cost associate With

44:58

that, and I wonder if that if

45:02

the mentality of internet equals

45:02

free, if that is going to make

45:06

if that's one of the challenges

45:06

that we face as podcasters,

45:10

creating content, that it's

45:10

valuable. It costs money to

45:15

produce, it costs money to host

45:15

and to deliver one of the

45:19

obstacles to monetizing, or to

45:19

being able to afford to do that

45:23

is this mentality of well, it's

45:23

on the internet, it must be

45:27

free, it's on Spotify can

45:27

download, it must be free, you

45:30

know, I can just download it

45:30

with a podcast app. So it must

45:32

not really cost anybody

45:32

anything. How do you respond to

45:36

that? Like, how do you how do

45:36

you get people to understand,

45:39

you know, this value for value

45:39

approach that I know that you've

45:43

had on the no agenda podcast,

45:43

and you've talked about in

45:46

podcasting 2.0.

45:48

I'll start with that.

45:48

First, the value for value

45:50

concept started about 11 or 12

45:50

years ago, almost probably close

45:55

to the 13. When Jhansi, Dvorak

45:55

and I were doing the show, we

45:58

were doing it on a regular

45:58

basis. And it was taking up real

46:01

time. And we said, Hey, this

46:01

takes real time. We love doing

46:06

it, we see this people out there

46:06

love it, you got to send us

46:08

something, but instead of

46:08

saying, saying $5, or, you know,

46:12

making up some arbitrary amount,

46:12

who said, whatever it's worth to

46:16

you. So I would literally say

46:16

just listen to us for an hour,

46:20

what is an hour of your time

46:20

worth? What was it that getting

46:23

anything out, if you didn't get

46:23

anything out of it, please don't

46:25

send anything. And there's no

46:25

penalty, you can listen to it

46:29

whenever you want. If you're

46:29

listening, then you clearly find

46:32

some value, and it was $1 send

46:32

that. So what we found very

46:36

quickly is people are happy to

46:36

send $5. So I'm actually will

46:40

send you 50. And there's always

46:40

a couple who will send you 500.

46:44

That's a mind boggling

46:44

experience. And then you learn

46:47

very quickly that if you remind

46:47

people that this is an

46:50

outstanding product, if you do

46:50

have to make good product, a lot

46:54

of people will never make money because it's just not good enough. But I believe that even

46:56

if 10 people love your podcast,

47:01

they will be they will sustain

47:01

you. You just have to say I need

47:05

an X amount to get by, and this

47:05

is what I need. And if you don't

47:09

do it, then I have to go find

47:09

something else to do. It's not

47:12

begging it's value for value.

47:12

It's It's interesting, I think

47:16

the most important thing I hear

47:16

for me to hear is someone who I

47:20

respect as an interviewer, a

47:20

host a personality, whatever it

47:24

is, to all of a sudden break

47:24

away and do some bullcrap spin

47:28

about some product, you know,

47:28

they don't give a crap about

47:30

superbeets Fine, whatever. You

47:30

know, that, to me is insulting.

47:34

That's really insulting. I'm not

47:34

against advertising. But I did

47:37

find that the nature of

47:37

podcasting is incompatible with

47:42

advertising. And I don't mean

47:42

Tommy, john, I don't mean

47:45

Squarespace, I'm talking about

47:45

brand advertising, Procter and

47:48

Gamble, a BMW General Motors,

47:48

pharmaceutical a guy but that's

47:54

where your money is. Otherwise,

47:54

you're just stirring around a

47:56

little pieces of food, if we're

47:56

serious about it. We're brand

48:00

unsafe by nature. And there's no

48:00

way for anybody to go through

48:04

every single podcast to make

48:04

sure that nothing offensive was

48:08

said, and you know, where we're

48:08

at it's advertising is now being

48:11

used as a weapon. And that's the

48:11

canceled cultures. It's because

48:15

someone doesn't like you would

48:15

go after your advertisers.

48:17

That's it, not because of what

48:17

you say necessarily. It's just a

48:21

wedge, it's a tool. That's why

48:21

advertising is censorship. It

48:24

took me eight years and $65

48:24

million to learn that it didn't

48:28

work in podcasting, you can't

48:28

scale it, it's not interesting.

48:32

And and what you wind up doing

48:32

is classroom, a whole bunch of

48:35

ads over mediocre content, I

48:35

want no part of that. Understand

48:39

that people need to be paid. You

48:39

really have to think in a in a

48:43

postmodern way. So value for

48:43

value is not restricting your

48:48

access, not gatekeeping what you

48:48

can listen what I'm doing, but

48:53

reminding you that what I'm

48:53

doing is valuable and making the

48:55

friction for you to get

48:55

something to me as easy as

48:59

possible. Now, let me talk about

48:59

the landscape because I've

49:02

thought about this, and I'm not

49:02

ready to talk about everything.

49:05

But there's definitely a

49:05

strategy in mind. So about 3% of

49:10

the no agenda audience supports

49:10

it financially 50 to 60% and

49:16

support it with time and talent.

49:16

So you know, there's a large

49:21

part of people who just we don't

49:21

know what they're doing, they're

49:23

not doing anything. They're not contributing, they're just hanging out fine. So the time

49:25

and talent of sort of the three

49:30

value for value, time, talent

49:30

and treasure, time and talent

49:33

that's making the show and where

49:33

appropriate. People get credited

49:37

as a producer. Most of them want

49:37

to be kept anonymous, but people

49:41

get a huge kick out of hearing

49:41

their information being used and

49:44

that's how it should be. They

49:44

are putting the show to get I

49:47

mean, we're so great. What cause

49:47

x VJs so good. Oh man, I'm just

49:52

jacking away. I can take the

49:52

hits can put it together. I can

49:55

make it flow. And I've learned a

49:55

lot along the way. But it's

49:58

really the producers who do

49:58

that. Now the treasure part is

50:02

people who turns out numerology

50:02

they want to send a message to

50:07

so they'll send a number 333 $69

50:07

and 69 cents me, I want to get

50:12

laid 41 you know, the 42, the

50:12

most important number in the

50:16

universe on pi days $3 and 14

50:16

cents $31 and 41 cents $314. And

50:24

we of course, you can find

50:24

exactly what money is coming in,

50:27

we give you the amounts, we tell

50:27

you who sent it. And people have

50:30

a message and they have

50:30

something to say, I love you. I

50:34

love my husband, happy birthday,

50:34

or wow man that really affected

50:39

me or I had my kids listen to

50:39

this, or I actually know what's

50:42

going on with this. So it's a

50:42

it's another feedback loop. And

50:46

it's copyable. It's not that

50:46

hard to do. So we know that

50:52

people are willing to do it. And

50:52

that's about 3%. I think 1% is

50:55

doable for anybody 1% of your

50:55

audience should be able you

50:59

should be able to have them

50:59

support you financially. If we

51:03

look at the IAB numbers, the

51:03

Interactive Advertising Bureau,

51:06

which who knows, but let's just

51:06

say there's 100 million people

51:10

in the United States who listen

51:10

to podcasts, on average, a

51:14

listened to one hour a day,

51:14

seven days a week. So value an

51:20

hour at $1. So we have 100

51:20

million people 1% of that is a

51:25

million times your dollar an

51:25

hour is a million dollars a day

51:31

of people willing to give their

51:31

money to podcasts they listen

51:35

to. I think that's an

51:35

interesting market to start

51:39

with. Because once you got them

51:39

that, you know, you can just

51:43

$1 $1 per hour. That's a lot of

51:43

money. And I think we can I

51:49

think we know how to go after

51:49

it. And it's going to make it

51:52

frictionless. It will ultimately

51:52

start with a better proposition

51:58

than what we are offering today.

51:58

Spotify thinks that music is a

52:03

better music. And podcasting is

52:03

a better proposition. I believe

52:07

we can make podcasting, more

52:07

exciting, better, much more

52:10

interactive. Some of the stuff

52:10

I'm seeing talked about, about

52:14

sending, having chapter markers

52:14

being sent back into the

52:18

database for distribution, that

52:18

now you're getting something

52:21

interesting that people are also

52:21

able to contribute in some way

52:25

to, to the program, even though

52:25

it's not directly in the

52:29

program, they're doing

52:29

something, they're adding

52:31

something they're adding value.

52:31

So my dream is you press a

52:36

button, and you've got mp3 bits

52:36

coming one way, and there's some

52:40

money stream going back the

52:40

other way. And it's not one to

52:43

one, there's a couple other

52:43

people in that loop. And I think

52:47

we're going to be able to see

52:47

that in the next well, we got to

52:49

close out this first namespace

52:49

is going to freeze that down and

52:53

you know, get as many people on

52:53

board as possible. And I mean

52:57

that the uptake has been really

52:57

fantastic. And it's like, it's

53:01

like things fall in our lap. All

53:01

of a sudden, Spotify kicks off

53:05

for so called q anon podcast.

53:05

Well, I've listened to the X 22

53:10

podcasts and oh my gosh, it's so

53:10

offensive, please, why wouldn't

53:14

someone put together a

53:14

conspiracy theorist podcast app?

53:19

that just does that? Why not?

53:19

Why not? Have the god casters do

53:24

their own beautiful app just for

53:24

each individual religion? I

53:27

don't know it. It doesn't all

53:27

have to be a big library of you

53:31

can share, you can search but

53:31

you know, there's reasons why. I

53:36

think app developers who are

53:36

creating experiences can promote

53:40

a certain something that they

53:40

are also promotional people,

53:45

they need to promote their

53:45

wares. But I don't want them

53:47

doing it for a stupid banner ad.

53:47

I want to be in the mix. So I'm

53:52

gonna have to back the ATM up to

53:52

this puppy and show everybody

53:55

and then maybe we'll maybe

53:55

something will come out of it.

53:57

You know? You something fun will

53:57

happen. Not thank you enough.

54:02

Because when when Dave told me

54:02

that, you know you guys were

54:05

what you guys were doing, first

54:05

of all, how it makes so much

54:07

sense. You really jumped in and

54:07

it's really been incredible kind

54:11

and the blog post that that

54:11

really helps. And it's going to

54:15

get us somewhere it's really

54:15

going to get us somewhere. Yeah,

54:18

that's our hope. That's how

54:20

it is Travis ever say

54:20

anything. You just make him sit

54:22

there.

54:22

Oh, he can talk to

54:22

Travis. And Mike's on right,

54:24

buddy?

54:25

Oh, I love to talk. So

54:29

I'm just looking at Travis

54:29

the whole time like anything.

54:33

So so here's something

54:33

that I think will be really

54:36

helpful for the average

54:36

podcaster that's listening.

54:40

That's trying to figure out their place in this conversation. So a lot of the

54:42

conversation gets elevated to

54:45

the Joe Rogan's of the world and

54:45

the NPR of the world and it's

54:47

like 1%

54:49

of the 1%

54:51

it becomes like an

54:51

untouchable conversation. Right.

54:54

And so I think that the thing

54:54

that I would love to hear from

54:57

you is the developer thing. And

54:57

I know this is an overused word,

55:03

but developing the intimacy

55:03

between hosts and listeners, and

55:06

the downstream effects of

55:06

investing in better listening

55:10

experiences, both from a index

55:10

side from a host side from an

55:14

app developer side to make

55:14

podcasting, even more special

55:18

than it already is, to then

55:18

really help you know, drive that

55:22

narrative of podcasting is not

55:22

about getting the hundred

55:26

thousand subscriber play button

55:26

from YouTube. But it's about

55:29

connecting really strongly with

55:29

a handful of people that really

55:32

love what you do. So I just love

55:32

to hear kind of your vision for

55:36

how you're hoping podcasts index

55:36

and podcasting. 2.0 is able to

55:40

bring that to life in the future.

55:42

Well, you know that

55:42

Travis, you can't just like you

55:46

can't make a great code writer

55:46

developer, they are. Not every

55:53

person who's doing a podcast,

55:53

you know, is going to be great.

55:57

In fact, a lot probably will be

55:57

pretty mediocre as as you'd

56:02

expect. Personally, I think the

56:02

the the jewel for podcasting is

56:08

in, understand, and that's the

56:08

pot, it's not really a

56:11

technology issue. It's just your

56:11

honor. Do you listen to your

56:15

audience? And what's your

56:15

takeaway, and you know, I give

56:21

everybody everyone gets some

56:21

form of answer on the email, you

56:24

may be macro it by me to do

56:24

thanks, but I meant it, and I

56:28

sent it. But in general, I

56:28

really think the audience needs

56:34

to be a part of the production,

56:34

that's not appropriate for a lot

56:38

of shows that people like cereal

56:38

as an example. And but I think I

56:44

personally find it a little bit

56:44

boring, I want to hear the

56:46

audience is a part of it. And I

56:46

want people to think they're a

56:49

part of it. Even if they're not

56:49

participating, or that there's

56:52

that possibility to be a part of

56:52

it through one of many, many

56:55

ways. That's, that's really a

56:55

talent. And it has nothing to do

57:00

with the technology is, how do

57:00

you use this medium, we always

57:04

use the new medium with the

57:04

programming from the previous

57:07

one. So you know, it's taken a

57:07

little while, but I think I've

57:13

seen it all along is there's a

57:13

different way to communicate

57:16

with the audience and get them

57:16

involved. And they'll support it

57:22

because it's about them. Now, in

57:22

this case, I have a pretty broad

57:25

topic, but I could do it for any

57:25

I could do it for helicopters

57:28

and stuff. As long as I know

57:28

what I'm talking about, I could

57:32

do about any topic, and it would

57:32

just depend on what my goals

57:35

are. But I think again, take

57:35

that 1%. So if you have no if

57:40

you got 1000 people that are

57:40

listening, and you can get him,

57:45

Well, can you get 10 of them to

57:45

listen to participate with

57:49

finances, and 40% giving you

57:49

other things? I think I think

57:55

that's the magic right there.

57:55

It's like this, you're doing a

58:00

podcast for your customers. I

58:00

mean, let me Why am I even

58:04

telling you this, you figured it

58:04

out already. I mean, you are

58:06

doing exactly what I'm talking

58:06

about. This this is this is for

58:10

your, for your for your your

58:10

community, your tribe, whether

58:14

it's 10 people or 10,000,

58:16

thank you so much for for

58:16

coming on and talking to our

58:18

audience. And I hope that this

58:18

helps our customers and our fans

58:23

understand what we're doing and

58:23

why we've invested so much time,

58:26

effort and energy into

58:26

supporting the podcast index and

58:29

working on this namespace and

58:29

rolling out features that might

58:32

not have necessarily been at the

58:32

top of your list. But you know,

58:34

we see that they're important.

58:34

And they're important, not just

58:37

for Buzzsprout, and for the

58:37

Buzzsprout customers, but for

58:40

the community at large and

58:40

protecting the space that we all

58:42

care and love. And so that's

58:42

what we're doing. That's what

58:46

we're excited about. Adam, we

58:46

thank you so much for kicking it

58:49

off and for being the pod

58:49

father, and for your time today.

58:53

Thank you and again, thank

58:53

you so much for what would you

58:56

guys have been doing

58:56

individually and as a team and

58:59

pay attention everybody because

58:59

this doesn't happen all that

59:02

often where you get a whole

59:02

bunch of people who just have

59:05

some loose common goals working

59:05

together and and sprouts and

59:10

trees coming out of it. And

59:10

anyone who's listening or

59:14

watching can be an active part

59:14

of that. So we look forward to

59:18

seeing as many people come play

59:18

as we can get and thank you

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features